Pedophilia: Happening All Around You

It’s one of those things that we hear about, don’t want to think it can ever happen, but deep inside know that it is and try hard to NOT think it might involve people we know. It’s a parent’s worst nightmare: somebody lurking in the dark to steal the breath of life out of our children. It’s incorrigible and something we try hard to keep somewhere deep inside. “It will never happen to us!”

But too often it does.

It’s amazing what people can keep secret. Too often word slips out about some greasy guy down the street who drives slowly around the neighborhood, looking for children to really be nice to. But that’s not how pedophilia usually happens. With technology, social media, and the fact that children from all over the world spend far too much time alone on their parents’ computers, international pedophilia linked to chid sex trafficking and online child pornography is a multi-billion dollar business — all at the expense of kids. The U.S. has its share, but in parts of Europe it has been perfected.

A former Chancellor of West Germany, Berlin senators, bureaucrats, and members of the educational establishment have all been implicated in a network “in which pedophilia positions were accepted, supported, and defended”, according to a report into the placement of homeless children with known pedophile foster parents by the German government.

For over a year, researchers at the University of Hildesheim have undertaken the examination of thousands of files in the Senate Education Administration in Berlin. The 57-page report, which was published this week, found that a “network of actors in the Senate administration and institutions of educational reforms during the home reform of the 1970s tolerated the establishment of shared apartments and foster homes for pedophile men.”

A man with a criminal record for child abuse, referred to in the report as Fritz H., was able to rape and abuse at least nine children that were given to him as foster children under the government-backed scheme. Despite the extreme warning signs, Berlin youth welfare officers consistently chose him as a foster father to children, who were often six or seven years old.

The abuse committed by Fritz H. was carried out from the 1970s until 2003, according to the local newspaper. The report specifically pointed to the Pedagogical Center in Berlin as the main coordinating institution of the scheme, though added that the policy was likely to have extended throughout the whole country.

The center was established in 1965 by then Governing Mayor of Berlin Willy Brandt of the Social Democratic Party (SDP). Brandt later served as the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany) from 1969 to 1974.

In 1971, he was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts to create closer ties with East Germany and improve relations between Poland and the Soviet Union.

According to the researchers, Willy Brandt strongly supported the project, while noting that the centre was “clearly” a subordinate of the Senate, which was presided over by governing Mayor Brandt.

The director of adult education at Pedagogical Center was Helmut Kentler (1928-2008), a social scientist, who argued that sex between adults and children was a crucial part to healthy sexual development, saying that “in some cases almost something like a gentler form of social work.”

A popular figure in Germany’s sexual revolution in the 1960s, Kentler often authored “expert” reports for the Berlin Senate and his books on “sexual liberation” were bestsellers at the time. The change in attitudes towards child sexuality in Germany at this time was part of the 1968 revolution that swept Europe and worked to throw aside all tradition and conventional wisdom, including the idea that children should not have sex with adults.

In the 1960s, there was a large population of homeless children in West Berlin. Kentler argued that the children should be placed with pedophile foster fathers, as they would be more loving towards the children. The so-called “Kentler experiment” lasted for some 30 years, with the approval of the government in Berlin.

According to University researchers, Kentler used his prominent position as director and his public reputation to shield the abuse carried out by pedophiles such as Fritz H.

The report also stressed that there are still some 1,000 files that the University was denied access to, meaning that many names of victims and those involved in the pedophile network remain unknown.

“In the basement of the education administration there are still around 1,000 files that have not yet been processed,” said Wolfgang Schröer, a member of the research team at the University in Berlin.

The report did point to three former Social Democrat Berlin senators — the Senator for School and Education Carl-Heinz Evers, the Senator for Youth and Sports Kurt Neubauer, and the Senator for Labour and Social Affairs Kurt Exner — for having a particular “hand” in the scheme.

Marco and Sven, two victims of the scheme, are currently suing the Berlin government for damages. Marco said “our lives have been ruined” and Sven added that “you can never really get over it.”

On Monday, the current Social Democrat Education Senator, Sandra Scheeres, said that the government will begin “talks about financial compensation” with the victims, reversing the previous policy of the Berlin Senate.

The “politically-correct” termed “Red-Red-Green Senate” — which gets its name from the color of the political parties in the governing coalition (red for the Social Democrats [SPD], red for the Left Party [Die Linke], and green for the Green Party) — has argued for years against any financial settlement on the grounds of statute of limitations.

In her statement, Senator Scheeres did not mention the missing 1,000 documents, the possible involvement of members from her political party, or whether members from other German parties were active in the network.

According to one of the victims: “They didn’t want anybody to be named. And they have achieved their goal. They’ve defended the system.”

Marianne Burkert-Eulitz of the Green Party — which itself pushed for the legalization of “consensual” sex between children and adults in the 1970s — accused the Senate of slow-walking an investigation into the network out of fear of political backlash if other prominent politicians are revealed to have been involved.

She said that “there were and are networks, they still exist,” adding that it may not be easy for political parties to admit culpability in the scandal “but it has to be done.”

Donald Trump during his 2016 campaign promised if elected he would immediately crackdown on pedophilia and child-sex trafficking in the U.S. His Department of Justice and FBI have quietly broken up numerous pedophilia rings throughout the U.S. making several thousand arrests. Many of the federally coordinated busts have been purposely kept quiet. When asked why, one specialist at the FBI answered, “The practice is so widespread in the U.S. we fear that if details of our investigations leak to the public, we will lose thousands of pedophiles who have been attacking U.S. children for decades. It’s a well organized and financed system that stretches across educational, ethnic, financial, and political groups. No sector in the country is without these sexual monsters.”

It was a shock to me when several years ago I learned that the sleepy little southern city of Shreveport, Louisiana, is an important stop on distribution of trafficking children snatched from all over the southwest. When talking to a federal investigator I asked what was so special about Shreveport?

“Shreveport is a perfect spot for distribution for kids of all ages for prostitution and trafficking. It’s located 180 miles east of Dallas on I-20 that intersects I-49 in downtown. It’s a natural stopping point in their distribution system.”

We have heard for a while about occasional prostitution busts at area hotels, but I had NO idea how deep the evil runs. I was reminded that “evil has no quarter, no partner, and is constantly seeking opportunity to spread its tentacles.” It’s scary that our babies are today more its targets than ever.

Twitter Directly in Pedophile Messaging

In the past week alone, it was reported that Twitter has suspended journalist Andy Ngo for tweeting inconvenient facts about the purported “epidemic” of transgender deaths, and undercover journalism organization Project Veritas from running recruitment ads. But if you’re a pedophile who wants to discuss your attraction to minors — Twitter’s just fine with that.

Big League Politics discovered a little-noticed, quietly enacted Twitter rule change from March, which says “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted, provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”

So, if you post politically inconvenient yet accurate statistical facts, as Ngo did, you get suspended. But if you discuss “attraction towards minors,” Twitter explicitly allows it.

It goes without saying that Twitter’s policy did not come from some blanket commitment to free speech. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has specifically rejected such commitments, dismissing the idea that Twitter is the “free speech wing of the free speech party,” as one Vice President at the company described it in 2012.

In an interview with Wired last year, Dorsey said that the “free speech wing” comment was a “joke” that was taken too seriously.

“This quote around ‘free speech wing of the free speech party’ was never, was never a mission of the company. It was never a descriptor of the company that we gave ourselves,” said Dorsey.

The Twitter CEO continued, saying that a commitment to free speech “comes with the realization that freedom of expression may adversely impact other people’s fundamental human rights, such as privacy, such as physical security.”

In other words, Twitter’s decision to allow pedophiles on its platform is something they’ve chosen to do, not something they have to do.

Summary

Here we are, living our lives, going to work every morning and coming home for dinner every evening. We take our kids to school, to soccer and baseball practice, dance recitals, friends’ birthday and swim parties. We never think about kids being coaxed via the internet to talk to or meet someone “right after school.”

Our kids are vulnerable. And today there’s no age we can truthfully say “I don’t need to worry about my daughter. She’s been taught what to watch for.”

Pedophiles and sex traffickers are experts at what they do.

When I dug into what I now know for certain is the underbelly of the beast that wants to destroy all that’s good in our lives — pedophilia and child sex trafficking, it’s hard to sleep at night.

“God protect my grandchildren from the evil that wants to take them — to take all our innocent children.”

Watch Over Your Babies!

Indemnification for the Big Social Media Platforms: Good or Bad?

If you haven’t been in Facebook or Twitter Jail at least once or have never had a post pulled down for “violating their social guidelines,” you are either 100% happy with everything in your life, someone who never posts anything on any social media site, or you can’t remember any of your passwords! One would think in today’s litigious world in which anyone can sue anyone for anything, most of which never result in a court victory but almost always end with a settlement, Americans would be standing in line with lawsuits in hand. Virtually every day, someone posts some craziness at every social site, lies, innuendos, and even untruths that impact the lives of millions of people who read and see those posts and just “assume” what they see is true. It’s similar to being in a crowd of people with an acquaintance named Jim you may not like, and you scream across the crowd to him, asking, “Hey Jim. Have you ever quit beating your wife?” Jim probably never DID beat his wife. But everyone in that crowd that knew Jim and heard you would automatically accept the inference you made as factual. And that’s just not right.

Social media is a different animal. And when federal laws were made to align with Federal Communication (FCC) broadcast issues, Zuckerberg was still in college, scamming all his buddies back East. Because of that and the misunderstandings of the First Amendment by most lawmakers, the Social Media companies armed with tens of millions of campaign dollars quietly visited the halls of Congress. They set the stage for their universal indemnification for ANY of the content posted on their sites. It didn’t matter if Donnie threatened with a tweet that he was going to gun down his next-door neighbor that night or posted on Facebook that his boss was out every night in drag picking up other guys from work, Congress gave both Twitter and Facebook indemnification for either of Donnie’s posts — regardless of their truth or any outcome of either post. That policy just opened Pandora’s box. And the last decade-plus has seen millions of posts that fall into this category or others that are way below acceptable in the minds of most people.

How did Congress facilitate this? They passed a law. This “covering” for the Social Giants comes from Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act from the 90s. Hey, that’s a lifetime ago in this age of technology. And Google, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snap Chat, and all the others have lived at the trough of complete immunity for themselves, stockholders, and employees for ANYTHING posted on their sites. It wasn’t until they each decided to forge into politics that saw ANY censorship of posts and pictures. No one told the giants to take any such actions. But owners and management decided they had social responsibilities to tackle politics. And grab that world they did.

To no one’s surprise, the mostly Democrat workers that populate the employee lists at these Silicon Valley companies decided to take a Democrat party tilt in their censorship of posts. How could they do that? It certainly seemed to violate the Freedom of Speech guaranteed to us all in the First Amendment. But they had a trick up their sleeves: they are privately owned companies! Therefore, they slide beneath the Constitutional restrictions that prevent censorship of words and writings. And they have had lots of fun!

But, enter Attorney General William Barr and the current Department of Justice.

The Department of Justice is aiming tech’s liability shield with a new set of legislative proposals released Wednesday. The proposed reforms are the latest action aiming to weaken legal protection established through Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a 1990s-era law. The statute protects online platforms, such as Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube, from being held liable for content their users post on their sites, and also allows them to moderate content in good faith.

The DOJ’s proposed reforms, which would have to be passed by Congress to go into effect, would limit the broad protections that Section 230 typically provides to the tech industry. Platforms could lose immunity if they facilitate or solicit federal criminal activity, like trafficking illicit drugs. It would also create carve-outs for child exploitation, terrorism, and cyberstalking, holding tech companies accountable for taking action on such content.

The proposal also would make clear that Section 230 protections cannot be used to dispute antitrust claims, a significant statement as the Justice Department is reportedly preparing an antitrust suit against Google for as soon as this summer. Facebook has also disclosed an antitrust investigation by the Federal Trade Commission.

“Changing significantly … the balance of responsibilities and provisions about liability in Section 230 would mean less speech of all kinds appearing online,” said Nick Clegg, Facebook’s vice president of global affairs and communications, in a call with reporters on Wednesday afternoon.

It’s unclear how much support the proposals will gain in Congress. Both Republicans and Democrats have argued that Section 230, which was initially envisioned as a way to protect upstart tech companies from a deluge of lawsuits, now appears outdated as it protects powerful companies worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

But while Democratic concerns have focused more on holding companies accountable for keeping users safe, Republicans have also emphasized alleged censorship of conservative voices. Tech companies have repeatedly denied that they censor political speech, but instances, where they have removed posts in error, have fueled such criticism.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), a former venture capitalist and a frequent critic of Section 230, said in a statement that he is wary of reforms brought by the Trump Administration.

“While I believe reform of this outdated law is needed, I have serious concerns that under the supervision of Attorney General Barr this effort has been politicized and will be used by the Trump Administration to cow platforms into allowing Trump, dark money groups, and right-wing militias to continue to exploit their tools to sow disinformation, engage in targeted harassment, and suppress voter participation,” Warner said.

Earlier on Wednesday, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), another leading critic of Big Tech and Section 230, introduced a new bill that would require platforms to promise to act in good faith in their terms of service. That would open tech companies up to potential lawsuits from users claiming breaches of contract.

Last month, President Donald Trump signed an executive order instructing the Federal Communications Commission to write rules regulating how social media companies can remove content from their sites while maintaining Section 230 immunity, and encouraging the Federal Trade Commission to take action against companies engaging in “deceptive” acts of communication.

At the time, Attorney General Bill Barr indicated the DOJ would seek to sue social media companies and said Section 230 “had been stretched way beyond its original intention.” Barr held a forum at the DOJ earlier this year, inviting experts to weigh in on potential reform of the law. He told a gathering of the National Association of Attorneys General in December that the department was “studying Section 230 and its scope.”

A White House spokesperson said in a statement that “President Trump is pleased to see the department following through” on legislation modeled after the executive order.

Without legislative reform, little is likely to change. Courts have consistently upheld Section 230 protections under current law. Bills aiming to amend the law have already drawn tremendous pushback from the tech industry, which claims that cracking down on Section 230 will ultimately stifle speech since platforms will have to remove any content that might leave them open to legal repercussions.

The tech industry has also pointed out that Section 230 already allows tech companies to be held criminally liable for illegal activity. But the DOJ’s proposal would allow victims of online scams or child exploitation, for example, to pursue civil action against a platform if they believe the company had knowledge of the illegal activity and did not take steps to remove it.

Congress did successfully introduce reform to Section 230 in 2018 with the passage of FOSTA-SESTA. The pair of bills from the House and Senate aimed to crack down on online sex trafficking by creating a carve-out to Section 230 immunity for ads promoting sex work. While the bills gained broad support in Congress at the time, they have been criticized by sex worker advocates for making their livelihood less safe by removing websites where they would vet potential clients.

Summary

So what is the right way to go here? In my opinion, Congress should look around the world of business in this Capitalistic society. The founders of these tech giants rolled the dice, created start-up struggling companies by borrowing money, selling stock, putting what little money they had personally to get things going in their pursuit of the American dream. Each of them knocked home runs. They and their stockholders have billions of dollars in ownership equity, most of whom at the beginning invested virtually nothing compared to their worth today.

In the rest of the business world, there is a risk that goes along with reward. Congress gave the tech companies the green light to create a place for everyone on planet Earth to vent, say anything, represent anything, and even create and publish scams that have cost unwitting Americans billions of dollars through the year. Yes, law enforcement agencies have, in some cases, been able to find and prosecute some of these wrongdoers. But shouldn’t these companies like every other company in the U.S. bear some responsibility for their allowing anyone to say anything without those people or their content being investigated in any way for accuracy and truthfulness? John Smith’s Corporation is held liable to that principle. Why should Google, Facebook, and Twitter not bear the same responsibilities?

I’ll just offer a guess: maybe these companies have grown too large, have spread too wide, and while doing so have used their power and money to pushback the responsibility to lawmakers that supposedly watch over all of us to prevent con artists from scamming us.

Additionally, the Censors for these private companies don’t neglect to fulfill their partisan political agendas by grabbing posts and tweets of many who are from some other political ilk with which the techies do not agree and delete them, post warnings with those they let be published, or just simply put the poster in jail, restricting ANY posting for some arbitrary period of time. They can do it because they’re private entities.

The bottom line is this: “those who own all the gold are the ones that make all the rules.”

Throw Apple and Microsoft into the bunch (although neither is a social media monster), and the collective value of them together is about $4 Trillion.

I’d say that if they don’t own ALL the gold, they certainly own MOST of the gold!

Play

The Evil of Wealth and Fame: The Gates

At the world vaccine summit on June 4, Melinda Gates, co-founder of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, used the protests against racism that have been taking place in the United States to say that African Americans should be among the first to receive a vaccine for the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Virus.

I didn’t just make that up, folks. Melinda Gates made a racial demand known that the COVID-19 vaccine, which the Gates Foundation has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its development, should be made available first to African Americans in America. No doubt that sounds like a worthy cause. But why would she make such a sweeping suggestion?

During an interview with Time magazine, the wife of Microsoft’s co-founder revealed that those who should receive the vaccine for the CCP Virus after the medical staff around the world should be African Americans in the United States, even though she did not give a clear explanation for her statements.

“The first people that need this vaccine are the 60 million health care workers around the world. They deserve to get it before anybody else. Then you start tiering,” said Melinda Gates, who, when asked who should get the vaccine next, replied, “In the U.S., that would be black people next, quite honestly, and many other people of color.”

Gates’s arguments are consistent with the media narrative that has been circulating condemning racism in the United States in the wake of the outrage that was formed by the death of African American George Floyd on May 25 at the hands of a white police officer. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is known for funding expensive and controversial vaccination projects around the world with the goal, according to the foundation’s website, of fighting individual diseases or addressing global health challenges in the face of potential future outbreaks.

This organization has also been leading the funding for the World Health Organization in recent years and was only surpassed by the United States. However, President Donald Trump in April ended funding for the organization because it had failed in its primary duty to protect people, allowing the pandemic to spread around the world.

The WHO has also received numerous criticisms from the governments of different countries that distrust the transparency of this international organization in the handling of the virus and the efforts of a coverup that could exist due to the influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Meanwhile, the arguments that Melinda Gates would have used to announce that African Americans would be the first to receive a vaccine point to an “equitable way” of dealing with the discrimination experienced by people of color.

“This pledging event means governments around the world will step up in global cooperation to all say, ‘We care about this vaccine getting out equitably,” said Gates, who also noted that “people with underlying health conditions, and then people who are older” would be next in line to receive the vaccine.

Gates’s statements quickly drew criticism from some social network users who questioned whether the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s plans were racially and politically motivated.

“Evidently they do and Melinda Gates wants black people to be the first to get the Bill #GatesOfHell population reducing vaccine that he holds the patents on,” wrote one Twitter user Diamond T.

“Racist Bill Gates has it all figured out. He can reduce the black population and make billions doing it. #ExposeBillGates,” he added.

Regarding the U.S.’s disassociation from the WHO, Melinda Gates noted that no institution is perfect and that amid the pandemic, the last thing [government] should do is make changes or withdraw. “The U.S. government is the largest funder of the WHO. Nobody can replace the funding the U.S. was putting into the WHO,” Gates added.

In mid-May, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decided to suspend a project on coronavirus testing that had been funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative, known as the Seattle Coronavirus Assessment Network, or SCAN, said in a statement, “The FDA has not raised any concerns regarding the safety and accuracy of SCAN’s test, but we have been asked to pause testing until we receive that additional authorization,” Reuters reported.

According to the platform designed by the White House, We Are The People, a petition, is currently underway to have Congress investigate the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for “crimes against humanity” and “medical malpractice.” So far, the petition has reached a staggering 580,000 signatures from citizens concerned about the role of the two philanthropists’ foundation in the spread of the coronavirus.

So What’s Up with The Gates?

Their hands are anything but clean, folks.

In 2009, several schools for tribal children in India became sites for observation studies for a cervical cancer vaccine that was administered to thousands of girls aged between nine and 15. The girls were administered the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine in three rounds that year under the supervision of state health department officials. The vaccine used was Gardasil, manufactured by Merck. It was administered to around 16,000 girls in the district, many of whom stayed in state government-run hostels meant for tribal students.

Months later, many girls started falling ill and, by 2010, five of them died. Two more deaths were reported from another village where an estimated 14,000 children studying in schools meant for tribal children were also vaccinated with another brand of HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GSK. Earlier in the week, the Associated Press reported that scores of teenaged girls were hospitalized in a small town in northern Colombia with symptoms that parents suspect could be an adverse reaction to Gardasil.

A standing committee on health and family welfare that investigated the irregularities pertaining to the observation studies in India tabled its report in 2013. The committee found that the objective behind the observation studies in India primarily was to collect and record data on the effect of the vaccines on the minor subjects. Another aim is to help the relevant authorities in India make an informed opinion on introducing the vaccine into India’s immunization program.

The standing committee report was a shocker, but it became even more significant when it was mentioned that the study was sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF).
Gates revealed that he was funding several efforts in partnership with other companies and countries to “save months because every month counts.” “Our early money can accelerate things,” Gates told The Daily Show with Trevor Noah. “Of all the vaccine constructs, the seven most promising of those, even though we’ll end up picking at most two of them, we’re going to fund factories for all seven, and just so that we don’t waste time in serially saying, ‘Okay, which vaccine works?’ And then building the factory.”

Gates added that spending “a few billion dollars in this situation we’re in, where there are trillions of dollars — that’s a thousand times more — trillions of dollars being lost economically, it is worth it.”

Follow the Money

The Gates Foundation has funded numerous vaccination tests conducted throughout the African continent through the years. Unfortunately, the accuracy of the information that comes from those nations has been questionable at best. And there are those in some news outlets that question whether or not dollars and cents in the millions donated by the Gates clouded the accuracy of those vaccination study results. The problem is that NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE.

Yes, there have been reports of tests that have been ineffective, somewhat effective, and successful. But the fact that those trials and their results have not been widely reported casts doubts on the entire Gates Foundation vaccination concentration.

Many say anytime there are questions of anything in politics or business that prove or appear to confirm success are usually based on one and only one thing: money. And the Gates Foundation has many who point fingers at the Foundation for funding and trying to hide negative results of their third-world testings kept quiet, wondering if there are personal goals and objectives for their doing so.

Keep in mind, Bill Gates made it clear as long ago as in 2010 that (paraphrased) he is NOT a population control nut, instead, he because he cannot see Earth sustaining the current annual population growth indefinitely, we MUST find ways to stop the growth of population, but NOT at the expense of those already alive.

Bundle those thoughts with these questions:

  • Why are vaccinations THE most important medical process in our lifetimes and those of our children and grandchildren? (that according to Bill and Melinda Gates)
  • What are the financial probabilities of successful discovery, positive testing, development and market of vaccines for pretty much everything: COVID-19, HPM, Cancer, Cystic Fibrosis, and other diseases? Some have put the potential dollars that will be made when a COVID-19 vaccine goes to market as $100 billion per year! Gates famously said he intends to create an environment in which EVERY child on Earth will be required to be vaccinated by these vaccines. Imagin the ongoing profit to be made.
  • A scary thought when considering Melinda Gates’ statement that African Americans should be at the front of the line for COVID-19 vaccinations has horrified many. Why? With their multiple public comments for the necessity of population control, what better way to accomplish that than with something inserted in a vaccine? What else could be mixed with the vaccine serum in a syringe that is dispensing the COVID-19 vaccine?

Summary

We can take this down all sorts of mysterious and spooky paths — this “conspiracy theory.” One can go to several different fact-check sites and search “Gates population control theory.” You’ll see several articles published by several reputable news sources that debunk any concern of such evil even being considered.

I am indeed not maintaining that these thoughts in this story are factual. We are careful to take that approach every time we present something that hasn’t been verified. In this case, these thoughts have NOT been verified, but because the facts of all of this have been purposely hidden, covered-up by those medical technicians involved in this process who certainly don’t want to be exposed, which is easily accomplished because of the undeniable financial prowess of the Gates family.

What should be done? What CAN be done?! Those are real questions. Unfortunately, my answers can only be for me:

  1. I will NEVER take another vaccination. I have received several in the past for the flu and pneumonia. I shudder to think I have NO idea what was included in those syringes. Quite honestly, the flu virus does not work in even a majority of its uses in the U.S., and no one says a thing about it. If there is a reality in such a vaccine, wouldn’t it be prudent to question its continued usage?
  2. I will continue to diligently research the laboratory test results that I can find anywhere on Earth: who initiates those studies, who holds the researchers accountable for findings, and who funds them. We have ongoing research underway to try and get details of the reported failed human tests completed in remote African villages for polio and HPM vaccines funded by the Gates Foundation.

For you, I suggest you question EVERYTHING! It is no longer sufficient in the U.S. to without thought trust what we hear from medical “experts.” If nothing has ever given you pause for doing so before, indeed, with all of the untruths and misinformation we have received from numerous experts regarding COVID-19 should make you question!

No, doing so is not easy. It takes time; it takes developing relationships with people who you usually would not do so. It takes work. Our commitment here is to keep doing so. You would not believe the plethora of emails, texts, that include stories, names, theories, and statements by people regarding all of this. What do we do with it all? We research it. Our underlying assumption when we begin is this: we’ll look at each asking the question, “What if we DON’T prove it’s false? What will the potential cost be, and for whom?” That’s a scary responsibility?

“To Whom much is given, much is expected.”

That’s a lofty characterization of stewardship of all things that have been given to us. You may be angry at me for saying what I say in closing: “Now that you know how and what on which to base YOUR research, you’re responsible for what you do with it!”

Insanity at NBC News

That probably doesn’t surprise too many of you: that anyone would say anything that can indicate any insanity at  NBC. Actually, there’s plenty there to go around! When we were preparing our story for this podcast, I found an interview with a news anchor and Chuck Todd — who is NBC’s political guru of sorts — and I was so taken aback listening to the two psychoanalyze not just President Trump, but every Republican member of Congress and every other Republican in the nation I stopped and was speechless. I thought, “I’ve got to break this idiocy down for all our TNN partners.

Because of my intense desire to show you personally just how jaded NBC News has become and just how consumed with their hatred for this president, I chose not to write the story. It’s much better and far more descriptive if I just do the audio podcast, play the interview, and stop their comments intermittently and give you MY analysis of their insanity while pointing out specifically just how they “bend” the truth to fit the narrative that is so pervasive at NBC News.

Please don’t be angry there’s no story today! Listen to the podcast. I think when you hear their mantra and my comments you’ll understand. And my hope is that we all will get to a place where anything we hear from those who have been permanently tagged as Leftist media hacks in their “reporting” are NOT given the benefit of the doubt when we hear them. Let the truth ring through their very words and expose their biases themselves.

We’ll elaborate on all this and more at 9:00 AM Central today on TNN Live. Don’t miss it!

Play

What Should We Call It?

It’s taken over the nation in just three short months. It’s everywhere. It consumes each 24/7 news cycle, it dominates work and home atmospheres, and it’s pretty much all Americans speak about to each other. It so dominates our social and political cultures today, one would think it long ago would have been analyzed, examined for its sources and substances, and because of its detrimental results in the nation would have been eliminated. If not removed, we would have a well-devised plan in place and operation and be well on the way to its destruction.

But it’s still here. And it’s still dominating our lives. Every day we watch it consume all the oxygen in the air, choking out independence, freedom, entrepreneurship, peace, joy, what little tranquility we can find in our busy lives, and is stealing the souls of our children. It’s not religion. It’s not politics. It’s not war. It’s not even divisiveness or anger or hatred, or fear.

What is it?

It’s chaos. It’s here, it’s spreading, and it’s consuming every aspect of every American’s life. It’s dominating almost every waking hour of each of us. It even wants to take over our sleep. Its objective? The identical goal it has had since it first appeared on Earth: the destruction of all that’s good.

In the past few years, we’ve published stories about chaos. But we’ve not seen such chaos as today. Indeed, chaos has been robust and far-reaching in the past from time to time. But today, chaos has taken on a life of its own. And it’s being fed the fuel that will not only perpetuate its living with us but will enable it to grow ever more powerful and all-consuming. And as it always does, it is set on the destruction of all that oppose it.

The Message of Chaos

What’s its goal? Who owns it? Why is it growing so rapidly and consuming so wide? And the last and probably most important question is: who is its Master?

Let’s work backward in finding those answers. Who started it all?

That’s an easy one to answer for Christians: “God is not the author of confusion, but peace.” With that verse, it is simple to consider that whatever or whoever is opposite of God is whatever or whoever control confusion. That would be Satan or whatever you wish to use to call him.

The objection of chaos can never be for any positive purpose. It has always been divisive by its nature. It never calls on unity or peaceful communication or purposeful finding ways to dissolve the confusion it creates. It feeds on anger and spitefulness, hatred, and meism. It is controlled by those who choose to weaponize it for causes to divide and separate people who it targets. Those have found ways to take ownership of that process and to enhance the damage it creates. Chaos draws its power from the selfishness of human nature — the lust for power and control over others. Chaos, by its nature, exists to permanently destroy all that is good.

Chaos’ master is Evil. And its taskmasters are all those who use it as a weapon of destruction for their perceived enemies.

2020 U.S. Chaos

It began with the impeachment of Donald Trump. The chaos narrative that was built for that project was created on a bundle of lies, misinformation, lying, cheating, and the demonization of some really good and honest people.

The Second Chapter of “2020 Chaos” was an artificial pandemic that was introduced to the United States by a group of medical experts.  They demanded the undying respect and obedience of every American to introduce and implement not real methods to tackle a new disease — which COVID-19 is — but to intimidate Americans with the continuous use of the fear of the unknown to in three short months destroy the American economy while calling on the messages emanating from American elitists who were given credibility by those around them because “they are experts, and we MUST listen to the experts.”

In full disclosure, I know COVID-19 is a disastrous disease and never have and will never denigrate that fact. But it is a manageable disease that, even with all of the purposeful mystery around it, will NOT destroy the United States. And it certainly does NOT warrant the chaos that has resulted from the non-factual facts that have been shoved down the throats of the nation. What it accomplished was to put Americans’ immunity systems in a pause because of the universal lockdown forced on the people by these elitists that have prevented us from normal interactions, which are mandatory for our bodies to protect themselves against bacterial and viral foes that permeate our atmosphere 24/7.

The Third Chapter of “2020 Chaos” is sowed racial unrest that was seeded by the horrendous act of four Minneapolis police in the George Floyd killing. After that atrocity, activists from dozens of known and unknown groups have pulled out the dog whistles of chaos and ordered demonstration and protests that seemingly and purposely often morph into looting and rioting. Those have all erupted into mass devastation and even death at the hands of other humans.

The Messengers of 2020 Chaos

Need I say? There could be NO better trained, NO better armed, NO one angrier than the Mainstream Media. They’ve had years to practice and to perfect their purpose. In those years, they’ve bowed to new taskmasters in politics who promised them horror stories about their opponents, nonstop camera and satellite news coverage of their riots, 24/7 coverage that aggressively identifies while demonizing the “supposed” foes of the partners of the Mainstream Media.

The truth? It matters little to the Media Mob. They see their foes limping and even bleeding a bit. Just like rabid dogs that the bleeding has stoked their hunger to finish their foes, no matter the cost and no matter what that “finish” might be. All that is relevant to them is a victory at the cost of all who they determine are on “the other side.”

Never mind how much destruction results from this chaos. Forget about the cost for it all that can never be recovered. Forget about what of the fiber of this nation that gives us our identities will be devoured and lost forever. All that matters is “The Win.” No price is too much; no cost is too high, no wrong is too wrong, no pain hurts too much.

Don’t doubt about this revelation. Here, I’ll let someone else paint a more definitive picture:

“We can seek out media that is well-sourced and informative.” That MUST be a requirement that not only do we adopt ourselves, but we teach our children the same things. If we do not pour into their malleable minds the truths in our world, their basis of reason will be established by others with whom they interact: like liberal teachers in our schools and universities and on YouTube, Snap Chat and Twitter posts, and what they see and hear in video games.

Who can turn down the chaos? Only ME, and only YOU.

Advice? Turn down the media. Moderate your own chaos. Stop letting agendas of others to whom you watch, listen, and read determine your state of mind. Be an individual — a thoughtful, deliberate, and conscientious decision-maker. Do that, and you’ll see your chaos meter go way down quickly.

Hurry up and do that! You’re going to need to get as low as possible. Why? I don’t think the chaos around us is going to go away anytime soon.

Play

Something Strange Going On

Mario Murillo is a Pastor in Oakland who has for decades been at the forefront of ministry to people of all races, ethnicities, and nationalities. His voice has always been one of reconciliation between people who seem to have nothing in common.

“Let me bid a fond farewell to some of you who will read this. Because after some of you read this, you will not read anything I write, again.

There is no doubt that the actions of one police officer were heinous. There is no question that we should all be outraged at anyone who believes in murdering someone, simply because of the color of their skin. As a nation we must stand together to rid ourselves of the scourge of hatred.

But will the way we are going about it make any difference? And why are Christians acting weird?

Something strange is in the neighborhood: Christians and preachers who have yet to repent before God for a. grieving the Holy Spirit; b. for preaching an artificial Gospel; or c. for their silence on abortion and sexual sin are, instead, repenting for being white.

They are reading a script handed them from the Left. They are not repenting of slavery, segregation, Jim Crow Laws, or racist cops. They are repenting of whiteness.

Nazi’s hated Jews, not because of anything they had done, but merely for being Jews. How is this emerging idea about the crime of ‘whiteness’ any different? I don’t care who you are, do you want to sow that seed into the heart of your child? And where will it end?

This tactic is not new. Some years ago, feminist scientists decided that testosterone was evil. In other words, manhood is intrinsically evil. They actually had a plan for eradicating your husbands, sons, brothers, fathers, and grandfathers. The current term is ‘toxic masculinity’.

Does someone need to explain Marxism to you again? Leftists need to incite blind rage. Everywhere a Communist revolution has taken place, it was fueled by hate. It identified certain groups as deserving any and all punishment. Again, not for what they had ever done, but simply because of who they were.

Chinese Communism identified Christians as evil and slaughtered them. In other countries they slaughtered Buddhists. At this hour, a great horror is unfolding in India where hundreds of Churches are being burned and Christians are being forced to engage in animism.

How many ways can I tell you that leftists do not really care about you? They need you, as Americans, to be in such a blind rage, that you will not see what they are doing behind your back. For decades Democrats have had unquestioned power over our inner cities. You want to talk about supremacy? That is supremacy! And what have they done for those citizens? What became of the trillions of dollars sent to those places to improve them? Show me a city run by Democrats for decades, and I will show you a city in decay.

The Left, like locusts, move on to a new field after they have consumed the old field. Right now, the Left has set its sights on Latinos. That’s because there are more of us. Next, they will get us angry and grieved. They want Latino children to feel like victims. They will leave the Black community behind as soon as their votes don’t matter anymore.

What does all this anger and rage do to us? It causes inner city children to waste time—time they could use to build a future. Villains have forced them to put their lives on hold—to make them feel victimized—to enrage them to do acts of violence. And when that crime is permanently on their record, and when that moment of rage has ruined their chances for a career…do you think any of these Marxists are going to come around and fix their family?

But it is not too late! You can turn that pseudo-repentance into true repentance. God can expose the Left, the evil they are doing, and their long-term goals. Right now, America is sick of the division and the hatred—and they do not care anymore where that hatred is coming from. Americans do not want to replace old hate with new hate, or old racism for new racism.

The only force that is able to save America is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The only love that can stop the crushing cycle of oppression and hatred is the love of God. My dear brothers and sisters in Christ, now that you realize your need for repenting…for God’s sake, don’t repent for being white, repent for sinning against the Lord.”

 

Saturday June 13, 2020 Bullet Points

We are finishing another busy and controversial week. It seems that every week is full of surprises in U.S. politics. (And we shouldn’t be surprised!) But each week seems to have something new, different, and usually more controversial than the last. This week we’re finishing did NOT disappoint, that’s for certain.

From the military in the streets of America, demonstrations turned riots, presidential controversy, and even political disagreements: we had them all! Let’s look at what happened during the week that you missed and want to look back:

Bullet Points

  • It’s an unfortunate travesty that happens to public health workers, but in the fight against COVID-19, it’s all too frequent. Public health workers that year-round work behind the scenes, out of the spotlight, and certainly in oblivion as it pertains to the media, are finding themselves targets of blame-placing of government second-level leaders who get caught in the blame-game regarding their normal operations. It’s sad, but it happens far too often: good, hard-working public servants being used as political pawns. For more details, click on this link:
  • President Trump finds himself this month in the crosshairs of a former disgusted National Security Advisor. John Bolton’s new “tell-all” book is set to hit bookstores on June 23rd. A ravenous pack of Trump-haters are foaming in anticipation of what some “insiders” are saying is Bolton’s revealing facts about a President who is a micro-manager who refuses input from learned advisors like Bolton. John Bolton has been around the block in D.C. He’s one of those guys in government you either like or hate: there’s no in-between. It’s probably safe to say that the Boltons and the Trumps will NOT be trading Christmas cards this winter. For more details, click on this link:
  • Cries for reparations for slavery injustices have been for decades discussed from time to time. It’s in the marketplace of ideas once again as racial tension because of very visible police violence has relit the fires of racism. An unlikely source has suggested that churches step up to the plate and pay actual reparations! Christianity Today — a storied Christian magazine — is making the case that Christians should stop just asking for forgiveness for slavery, but should actually pay for the sins of their fathers. For more details, click on this link:
  • Uh-Oh! The “Cancel Culture” warriors are probably getting set to take on another group of people who have decided to determine and right some wrongs committed by whites against blacks. Some are taking to “black-face” in which they use black-face on HALF their faces to evidence their solidarity with Black Lives Matter. I don’t know of any response yet from the “Cancel Culture” folks, but in keeping with their actions we are witnessing in every quarter of American society, it’s probable there will be some nasty backlash. For more details, click on this link:
  • A healthcare company headquartered in Texas finds itself in court defending its practices of marking-up medical bills exponentially, soaking insurance companies and patients for the stated purpose of protecting patients and doctors. TeamHealth is a medical staffing company that employs these doctors. TeamHealth actually bills for their emergency services. However, TeamHealth marks up the actual costs of the doctors and then forces insurance companies to pay the inflated prices. They have stated publicly they do so to protect the doctors which they employ. But documents show the doctors get very little of that money. For more details, click on this link:
  • There’s more noise in the NFL about former San Francisco 49er QB Colin Kaepernick. Seattle Seahawks coach Pete Carroll talked to reporters about his chance to sign Kaepernick in 2017. The Seahawks chose not to do so. Carroll says he, based on several phone calls, expects Kaepernick to get another shot. For more details, click on this link:
  • Speaking of the NFL, we’re getting very close to the time when NFL players report to training camp. NFL football fans are holding their breaths, praying for a 2020 season to kick off this Fall. The League is making exhaustive preparations for teams to prepare to practice and play while keeping players, coaches, and fans safe from COVID-19 infections. Baltimore Ravens Head Coach John Harbaugh says rules for doing so in some cases are impossible. For more details, click on this link:
  • Colleges and universities are facing some tough choices. They’re getting set for the Fall semester, but all are struggling with the “how-to’s” and “what-ifs” that go along with puzzling through the brand new challenges they have never faced: Should they do only online classes? How do they best protect professors, students, and others on their campuses? What about college football and basketball? There are numerous questions with scant time to get the right answers. With the temporary economic downturn and COVID-19, they are struggling to get comfort levels to open for students. For more details, click on this link:
  • Most states in the U.S. have at least partially reopened to get those back to work who have been shut down due to COVID-19. With all of the uncertainty of how to proceed and fear of creating a second wave of infections, government officials and business owners are fearful of an even worse virus breakout. Meanwhile, overseas some countries are already seeing what some are saying is the “second wave” of Coronavirus. For more details, click on this link:
  • Who is going to join Joe Biden as Vice President on the Democrat ticket in November? Biden has said he wants a female as Vice President. There are currently 12 who have been named as strong possibilities. Of late, California Senator Kamala Harris is who many think will get the nod. Who runs as Vice President has never been more important than in this election. Why? Biden, if he wins, will be the oldest to ever be sworn in as President. Americans already see some “slowing” of Mr. Biden. Remember: whoever serves as Vice President is only “one breath away from the Presidency.” For more details, click on this link:
Don’t forget to join us Monday through Friday from 9:00 to 11:00 AM (Central) for “TNN Live.” For two hours we host a talk show complete with the details of the day, we discuss political matters that are controversial but important to all of us, and you can join the conversation live to discuss any issues being covered, ask questions, or even make suggestions. Monday morning at 9:00, click on the blue banner at the top of the page to “Listen Live.” It will take you right to the radio show online. It’s that simple! Have a great weekend. We’ll see you Monday!

Authoritarianism in America IS Alive: And It Isn’t in Donald Trump

We’ve seen the Left point fingers at Donald Trump as far back as just weeks after he declared his 2016 run for the White House. They’ve spouted claims of his desire to be a king, a dictator, a monarch, and an authoritarian. Subsequent to his successful service as President, many of those same critics have softened their attacks a bit, no longer claiming he wants to be a king or dictator. But they are holding fast to the “authoritarian” moniker. I think they chose that word simply because it sounds sinister and evil. And they need something evil to attach to this President. I think they also use it because very few know its meaning!

Just to show Americans how brilliant Leftist university professors are, two political scientists from Harvard University have identified four warning signs that indicate if someone poses a dangerous authoritarian risk to a nation. No U.S. politician, at least dating back to the Civil War, has come close to ticking off all four boxes, one of the authors told Newsweek—until Donald Trump came along. And Mr. Trump, according to those two, is certainly exhibiting the characteristics that lean toward the “A” word.

Do you even know what “authoritarian” means? If you don’t, you are certainly not alone. One on-the-street survey conducted near several university campuses showed that a large majority of students when asked for the definition had NO idea what it meant. In fact, most confused an authoritarian with a dictator. But one thing with which almost all agreed is that Donald Trump certainly qualifies!

What the Heck Defines “Authoritarian?”

Authoritarian: “1. favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom. 2. favoring complete obedience or subjection to authority as opposed to individual freedom.”

Those two Harvard political scientists took it upon themselves to align the authoritarian definition with the current President. The used a broad brush in painting the picture in their writing to show the President’s authoritarianism by stating that “anyone not committed to the democratic rule of governing is an authoritarian.” And they summed up their allegations of POTUS:

“Trump was easily identifiable as someone who is not committed to the democratic rules of the game,” Levitsky told Newsweek on Thursday. “There is real cause for concern for the health of our democratic institutions.”

According to the pair, here are the four markers proving one’s authoritarian mentality:

  1. Rejecting or showing a weak commitment to democratic rules.
  2. Denying the legitimacy of political opponents.
  3. Encouraging or tolerating violence.
  4. A readiness to stifle or limit civil liberties of opponents, including media.
After they painted those four traits for us, they pontificated their “objective” summary, stating, “Those are things that Democratic candidates in the U.S. simply do not have,” they said. At least, until Trump.

Have I Missed Something?

First, in spite of all the noise of what was to be a heavy-handed presidency led by Donald Trump, we’ve seen a universal governing style by this president showing an undeniable commitment to democratic rule. As compared to the governing of his predecessor, Donald Trump, again and again, has railed against the top-down government from Washington, encouraging states over and over to take charge of their decision-making in governing themselves. He has lashed out at the Congressional control of Nancy Pelosi and others that almost daily stifle attempts by states and voters to push back against Big Government overreach.

Pelosi is the Congressional power jockey who in every piece of legislation proposed in the House under her leadership floods each bill with outlandish spending proposals that seldom have anything to do with assistance for everyday Americans. They almost always favor big campaign spenders and wealthy Democrat Party donors that most Americans are certain are just paybacks from the House Speaker.

Secondly, the Harvard scholars have confused Mr. Trump’s analyses of his opponent’s lack of governing proficiency for denying their legitimacy. Let’s face facts: just because someone is inept and unqualified in no way means they are illegitimate. He just as many Americans who are voters often question “capabilities” of his opponents and the opponents of other candidates. That’s not questioning legitimacy. It’s questioning capabilities to perform the tasks included in the position they seek. Doing so is actually an integral part of Democracy.

Regarding violence, Mr. Trump continually lashes out against ALL violence. He has never tolerated it and has taken dramatic steps to combat it numerous times with the authority of a U.S. President but always within his Constitutional authority. The recent responses to looting and rioting in several large U.S. cities show his demeanor is certainly not that of an authoritarian.

Finally, any allegation of attempts on his part to limit the civil liberties of any opponents is laughable. He certainly points out the fallacies of numerous opponents both political and media. But doing so is vastly different from “stifling” or “limiting” civil rights.

There ARE Plenty of American Authoritarians

They are everywhere! And we watch as they reveal their evils over and over in very public and demonstrative ways. They are not ALL in politics. But they ALL are in positions of power and seldom miss an opportunity to exert their powers over others. Do you want a few examples?

  • A Louisiana professor called on her colleagues to keep a list of students who engage in “hate speech” and “drop” them from classes at the public university after George Floyd’s death. Louisiana State University Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences Alyssa Johnson made the comments after the school’s official Twitter responded to those calls, saying, “we are subject to the constitutional limitation on our ability to take action in response to free speech.”

    Johnson wrote, in a now-deleted tweet: “If @LSU won’t take action, we as professors can. Keeping a list of names and if I see them enrolled in my course, I will drop them. It’s not just free speech, it’s hate speech and it’s a threat to student safety. #safespace #BlackLivesMatter”

  • Another professor in Johnson’s department, LSU Associate Professor William T. Doerrler, responded to another deleted tweet, writing: “Thank you!! If he enrolls in my class I’ll drop him too!”
  • The myriad of actions taken by governors and mayors during the COVID-19 pandemic have already resulted in lawsuits filed against states, counties, and cities for violating the Constitutional rights of citizens. The political leaders (none of which are the President) who are subjects of this litigation somehow draw their power to take such actions with total disregard for the infringement of citizens’ rights drawing from a mythical authority to do so because of the pandemic. In almost every case, one individual or a small group determines what action is necessary and initiates that action. These perfectly fit the definition of authoritarianism as described by these Harvard political scientists.
  • A Barack Obama rogue Department of Justice in conjunction with his FBI trampled all over the Constitutional rights of numerous members of the Trump Campaign when conducting illegal activities designed specifically to overturn the democratic election of a U.S. president. Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee were not only complicit in the attempted coup, but actually funded the production of false documents with which to initiate the attack.

Summary

There are two things many on the Left politically have either forgotten or never knew were factual. They have been mentioned numerous times here at TruthNewsNetwork. But in this environment and with these nonstop allegations against the President, it makes sense to repeat them:

  1. “Just because one thinks something is right doesn’t mean it is right.”
  2. “Just because one thinks something is wrong doesn’t mean it is wrong.”

Rather than relying on facts and reason, many in this charged political environment have abandoned reason and the pursuit of facts with which to form legitimate perspectives, we are daily witnessing the cries of a Mob’s desperation to attack this President just because of their dislike and disdain. But their emotional state is no basis for a Constitutional attack on individual Americans or their legal rights.

I have been patiently waiting for four years for those legal and political scholars to publish their narratives in support of the expressions of Constitutional rights guaranteed in the First Ten Amendments. I as of today have seen or heard none! Instead, the talking heads of the Left — the Mainstream Media — parrot the hollow threats in non-stop attacks against the Rule of Law, Equal Justice under the Law, and the freedoms retained by the States for the People contained individually and collectively in the First Ten Amendments.

Do you know why Jefferson was adamant to detail the specific authorities and rights our forefathers were NOT giving to the federal government but rather were specifically retained by the States? Because he knew actions, like we see playing out daily, would happen at some point in the future. He and others were adamant that they would guarantee future generations would NOT experience the authoritarian rule that crushed the spirits of individuals in Europe. That crushing was the final straw that led them to the New World. And they made certain it would never be infringed by any leaders in government, education, or business in America.

I’m not surprised by the authoritarian allegations made by the two Harvard scholars against Donald Trump. But I’m ashamed to hear that LSU professors have fallen into that trap. (I’m a rabid LSU supporter: Geaux Tigers!)

Biden is Dead Wrong — At Least on Two Counts

Now I know why former VP Joe Biden’s campaign handlers have worked diligently to draw from what little good there is from the lockdown during COVID-19: keeping Joe away from people. I don’t think even for one moment that his spending time in the basement of his house was just accidental. His problem is simple: every time he steps in front of a camera or a microphone, he steps in something that really stinks. Either of the two that have surfaced so far would suffice to lose the election for him. Both together may be what puts Donald Trump’s re-election over the top.

Biden: “Trump Squandered a Great Obama/Biden Economy”

Joe Biden claimed on Tuesday that President Donald Trump has “squandered” an economic expansion inherited from the previous administration.

“Donald Trump inherited the longest economic expansion in history from the Obama-Biden Administration, but like everything else he’s inherited, he has squandered it,” Biden wrote in a tweet.

The former vice president made his comment after the National Bureau of Economic Research noted on Tuesday that the U.S. economy peaked in February and has hit a downturn. In an article attached to his tweet, Biden said that the bureau’s announcement “that our economy has been in recession for months now is a reminder that well before the COVID-19 threat emerged, President Trump had already turned his back on the middle class.”

Biden criticized President Trump for cutting taxes for big corporations and the richest Americans instead of investing in the middle class, as well as driving manufacturing into a recession across the Midwest. He also blamed the president for systematically stacking the deck against working families.

“And now, even in a recession, President Trump is doubling down on this agenda, diverting money meant for small businesses to big corporations and his wealthy donors, and presiding over the largest corporate bailout in America with no strings attached, and little oversight,” he wrote. Biden said the president has forgotten about the middle class long before the CCP Virus pandemic hit the nation, causing millions of people to become unemployed and businesses to be shuttered.

Though Biden admitted that President Trump is not responsible for the CCP Virus, or coronavirus pandemic, he must be responsible for a completely bungled response that not only cost thousands of lives but millions of jobs that should not have been lost.

“The ‘unprecedented magnitude’ of the economic hit, and the ‘broad reach’ of it—that’s on Donald Trump,” Biden said. He added, “Millions of Americans are suffering right now because of his negligence and incompetence.”

In his article, Biden did not spend time talking about his own plans for the future as a candidate running against the incumbent president.

Biden also claimed that President Trump has “run the same playbook hollowing out our economy … the rich get richer, powerful get more power,” but data from the Congressional Budget Office shows that nearly 2.5 million Americans have been lifted out of poverty under Trump administration, while real household wealth has increased nearly $12 trillion since the start of 2017.

Before the CCP Virus outbreak hit the U.S. economy, the Trump administration had created nearly 7 million jobs since his election, including more than 500,000 manufacturing jobs, and the unemployment rate was at its lowest level in half a century.

There were seemingly no manufacturing or trade jobs under the Obama-Biden administration.

Christians Need to be Put on a Watch List

At the town hall, Biden advocated for a registry of all religious organizations that won’t toe the line of the gay agenda. That proclamation at the townhall parallels the agenda of the radical group called the Southern Poverty Law Center which is pushing for all opposition to the LGBTQ policies to be designated as “terrorism,” which under the “Patriot Act” means that an individual’s constitutional rights are nullified.

“What we had before to deal with hate crimes was we had a position in our administration, within both the Department of Justice as well as within Homeland Security, a provision to keep watch on these groups that we know are out there – like terrorist groups, they’re similar,” Biden stated, referring to the “danger” of Christians in American society.

Biden pushed three things to help end “hate crimes” against gays: passing the Equality Act, monitoring groups that are similar to terrorist groups, and rewrite federal civil rights laws to prevent discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Those seem benign enough, right?

Keep in mind, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s efforts for the designation of Christian groups as “hate groups” is, in essence, to criminalize the Biblical beliefs of more than one billion people on Earth. With such a formal designation, the federal government would be allowed to conduct surveillance legally on the Christian groups.

Summary

Oddly, NO Mainstream Media organization reported on either of these two declarations made by Mr. Biden. It should not be surprising that the MSM is already giving him free passes for anything and everything he says. I’ve heard of no one that holds him to account for the radical ideas he now espouses that are light years further left than even those of his former boss, Barack Obama. Biden is pandering to the far left to try and garner their support in the November election. And his opponents in the Republican Party have so far given him a pass on accountability for any of this.

There seems to be something ominous in all of this. His stances voiced, even in a vacuum, are grounds for a sound defeat for the former Vice President. But the details of just these two if ever announced by any other Democrat candidate would have been the basis for the removal from the ticket. Are Pelosi and Company planning to make a last-minute play to replace Mr. Biden with another Democrat? Would a Democrat National Committee’s declaration of a sudden physical incapacity of Joe Biden be sufficient to replace him?

Stranger things have happened.

One thing is certain: former VP Biden is NOT fit to serve as President today. The job and its requirements are far beyond his capabilities. And his wanton attacks on the Christian community easily disqualify him and certainly open pandora’s box of defeat.

I doubt Christians will find themselves with a terrorist designation. But simply the fact that a presidential candidate who was making a statement — not answering a question — would voluntarily state support for a religious group of people to be designated a terrorist organization. Let’s face it: there have been thousands of Christians around the world slaughtered by radical Islamists in the name of THEIR religion. They are not branded as a “terrorist” group — even in the United States. Yet in Biden’s mind, they should be.

“Out of the abundance of the heart a man speaks.”

The saddest thing about Joe is this: I believe he really thinks the economy was thriving under Barack Obama!

(In case you didn’t, the Obama economy was horrendous!)

Hitler at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

There are those on the far-left politically who have never hesitated to use the “H-word” describing President Trump. They use the “F-word” — “fascist” — as well. Most Americans have tired of hearing it. But among those in the far-left, it has become familiar to slam President Trump as being a dictator, fascist, autocrat, and even sometimes a totalitarian leader.

Are you kidding? Dictators don’t listen to their minions, don’t talk “to” their nation-followers, don’t pay attention to the desires of those they govern. Donald Trump clearly and prolifically has drawn distinctions between him and his predecessor in that regard. President Obama was and is an orator — an orator who gives excellent speeches that always during his presidency impacted dramatically those to whom he spoke. Further, every piece of legislation that he initiated or supported when crafted has been directly tied to the wishes of those 62 million who voted for him in 2016 and an abundance of others who did not pull the Trump lever. President Trump has clearly defined with his actions his commitment to the American people at the expense of the status quo Democrats AND Republicans AND other bureaucrats in Washington. And that infuriates many in political leadership in his own party. In his world, results are all that matters to the People. And his oath of office and his commitment to service to Americans. Results are all that drives him — certainly not promises that are never fulfilled.

Former U.S. defense secretary James Mattis slammed President Trump’s response to nationwide demonstrations triggered by the killing of George Floyd, accusing him of trying to divide the country. The retired Marine General said he has watched this week’s “unfolding events, angry and appalled” in an extraordinary statement published by The Atlantic.

Protesters filled the streets across the United States after Floyd, died in the custody of four police officers in Minneapolis. “Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people, does not even pretend to try,” Mattis said. “Instead, he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort.”

Wait one minute: Mattis went to work for Mr. Trump in 2017. He did so, having watched the President throughout his campaign and certainly knew Trump’s personality. Still, he took the job. Is it plausible that he didn’t know Trump’s demeanor or operating processes before he accepted the gig? That’s not logical. Why did he stay in the Trump Administration one more day after discovering Trump’s personality quirks with which he disagreed?

This is the first time General Mattis has publicly criticized his former boss since he resigned as defense secretary in 2018. He quit over Trump’s approach to foreign policy — particularly his decision to withdraw American forces from Syria.

‘We can unite without him.’

In his statement, Mattis singled out President Trump’s decision to leave the White House and hold a Bible outside nearby St John’s Episcopal Church. That day, mostly peaceful protesters were forced back by police with tear gas and flashbangs to make way for the President’s stop at the church. “We know that we are better than the abuse of executive authority that we witnessed in Lafayette Park,” Mattis said.

Retired Marine General  Mattis wrote that it would not be easy for Americans to move ahead without mature leadership. “We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society,” he insisted.

Mattis breaks his ‘duty of silence.’

When General Mattis quit the White House in 2018, he said he would not criticize the administration because he owed them a “duty of silence.” (What happened to that “duty?”)

“When you leave an administration over clear policy differences, you need to give the people who are still there as many opportunities as possible to defend the country,” he said in 2019.

But in Thursday’s statement, Mattis said as a member of the military; he swore an oath to protect the U.S. constitution. He said the White House should remember the words adopted by U.S. troops before the Normandy invasion during World War II.

“The Nazi slogan for destroying us … was ‘Divide and Conquer.’ Our American answer is ‘In Union, there is Strength.'”

Hitler in Charge

What about that military code to which all who don that U.S. uniform are bound? “Always be loyal to any who are in leadership over you, regardless of your differences. And if you cannot do that, you are obligated to resign.”

Without literally calling the President a dictator, a fascist, or a Nazi, Mattis’ implication is clear. And as we pointed out in yesterday’s story, joining Mattis in his departure from his former support for President Trump is Marine Corps. Gen. John Kelly who served as Chief of Staff to Trump, Former commander of US Southern Command under Obama; Marine Corps Gen. John Allen, former commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan under Obama; Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under George W. Bush and Obama; Air Force Gen. Richard Myers, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under George W. Bush; Army Gen. Raymond A. “Tony” Thomas, former commander of US Special Operations Command under Obama and Trump.

I find it ironic that these “great” military leaders would turn their backs on their years of service to our country during which each DEMANDED from those who served under them complete loyalty and unrepentant respect for the authority their stars gave to them as commanders of all those soldiers and sailors.

Call me a bit old fashioned, but I find these actions by these military leaders who commanded at the highest levels reprehensible and an assault on the Uniform Military Code of Justice. They each should do as the guidelines for all U.S. military members dictate: comply with authority or resign — PERIOD.

I remind these and others who have cried for four years that Donald Trump IS a dictator, a fascist, a White Supremacist, and a Nazi, that nothing in his life evidences any of these allegations to be true: NOTHING!

Those who served in Europe during WWII specifically should note the differences between this Commander in Chief and Hitler and Mussolini — the fathers of Naziism and Fascism, respectively. But, just in case any of these have memories that have dulled with the decades since the War, let’s listen to the words of an actual Nazi prison camp survivor who, among other things, bristles today at hearing the characterizations these men use to describe this President:

She Knows Naziism First-Hand

A German woman, who survived Nazi leader Adolf Hitler’s brutal reign, lived in a refugee camp, and fled to America, has noticed that liberals love to compare President Donald Trump to Hitler. However, when asked about the similarities between the two, she had just seven words that completely shocked leftists.

Before Inga Andrews escaped Hitler’s “final solution,” the Holocaust, she and her mother were forced to survive the catastrophic events brought about by the Nazi party’s socialism and racial hatred. For decades, her harrowing experience has been locked away in her mind’s eye. However, it was recently awakened when angry liberals began combatting Trump’s travel ban and other executive orders with easily repeatable slogans that equate Trump to Hitler.

Now, Andrews feels a duty not only to dismiss the dramatic propaganda that compares the two leaders but also to point out who represents everything that encompasses Hitler and his Nazi militants.

When the Independent Journal Review asked Andrews about her thoughts on leftists saying that Trump is a dictator, much like Hitler, she not only refuted this mistruth with personal experience, she explained that “it’s the destruction of freedom of speech” from the liberal protesters that resembles Hitler and Nazi-Germany.

“What is going on in this country is giving me chills. Trump is not like Hitler. Just because a leader wants order doesn’t mean they’re like a dictator,” Andrews told IJR. “What reminds me more of Hitler than anything else isn’t Trump, it’s the destruction of freedom of speech on the college campuses — the agendas fueled by the professors. That’s how Hitler started; he pulled in the youth to miseducate them, to brainwash them, it’s happening today.”

Andrews added that she recognizes the liberal bias in the school system, especially on college campuses, and says that it’s breeding the same intolerance and fascism that gave rise to Hitler in the 1930s. Also, Andrews had lived through a travel ban even stricter than Trump’s when her mother married an American. Still, she believes that liberals should have a respect for these measures as our national security depends on them.

“It took six years to clear her to be able to be married,” she said. “Then when you married an American, because we were the enemy, you had to wait. We had to go from Heidelberg to another city where a camp was. They vetted us in both places. There were all these German brides with their children and families who had to be vetted again for three of four days before they could get on the ship. So we had a vetting process like what we are going through now because you have to have this to make the country safe.”

As for the liberal protesters, Andrews says that because of their emotionally-driven activism, they have abandoned logic and reason. She remembers the desperation Democratic Socialism caused, including times when she only had “maple leaves and grass to survive,” something she says these leftist millennials have never had to endure. In short, equating Trump to Hitler is more of an insult to her and the millions who suffered and died during Hitler’s reign.

“Professors shouldn’t be telling their students to go after freedom of speech,” she said. “They should be telling them that this is the greatest country in the world…I see what is happening here, reflecting some of the things we saw in Germany, and it’s terrifying. It’s sad. But it’s not because of Trump. It’s because of poor education. Trump is not like Hitler. The theory that he is is propaganda. Yes, I lived through some of Nazi Germany, but all you have to do is read some books about that period to see how wrong that theory is.”

Andrews added a harsh but much-needed message to the liberals who are protesting against Trump and believing that bullying and violence will get them what they want:

“America needs to grow up. The young people who are rioting and destroying property, who have no respect for elders and freedom of speech, I was so proud to become a citizen of this country.”

I would not dare to put words in the mouth of this amazing woman, Ms. Andrews. She certainly does need my help to put it succinctly. And she did just that.

Based on their history in the U.S. Military, shouldn’t each of these men have resigned the moment they decided NOT to support the policies of the Commander-In-Chief?

Yes, they should — not because they did not bravely and loyally serve the United States, but because none of them are abiding by the commitments they made to follow the leadership in place over them.

More than that, they should each follow the wise practices of almost all those who have ever served at the highest White House positions under numerous presidents throughout history: “Honor, Serve, or Resign.”

“Gentlemen, thank you for your past military service.”