Time For COVID-19 Manipulators To Pay

There is something ominous in the wind. And it’s so obvious, you can smell it and almost see it. It’s been building for two years plus now. And every day it gets louder, stronger, and much bigger. It even smells!

It’s been disguised and sold to the American people, and to the people of every other country, as a disease and a pandemic: COVID-19. But, now, daily we learn something new that chips away at that “theory” of a pandemic and that “theory” of COVID-19 that “will destroy us all unless we COMPLY!”

A groundswell of pushback as blanketed the Earth. People are revolting in the millions. What against? The weaponization of a real virus for the sole purpose of seizing control of the populace.

Don’t get me wrong: COVID-19 is real, and it really kills. Forget about the conspiracy (that may or may not be true) that it originated in an Asian laboratory. Whether or not that happened, we have a SARS virus that can kill. But what we now know is that it’s been used against people to scare us into submission.

But its reign of terror is about over. There’s “formal” pushback afoot that may kill the COVID-19 giant in its tracks. It’s called, “Truth.”

It’s payback time.

Death To The COVID Monster!

According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:1

“In a stunning 46-page legal filing2 to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.”

The Dirty Sixteen

In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:

  1.  Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
  2.  Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
  3.  Bill Gates
  4.  Melinda Gates
  5.  Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  6. Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
  7.  Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
  8.  Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
  9.  Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
  10.   Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
  11.  Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
  12.  Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
  13.  Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
  14. June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
  15. Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
  16. Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum

The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was filed, are “the peoples of the United Kingdom.” One of the seven applicants is Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.

At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world. In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda.

“I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” he said in a “Planet Lockdown” interview published in late April 2021.3

What Is the International Criminal Court?

The International Criminal Court4,5 (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S.

The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but that doesn’t always happen.

If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals charged with these types of crimes, but it will typically only do so if the member state fails to take the appropriate legal actions against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield the individual in question from criminal responsibility. As noted in the complaint:6

“We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable to even get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts.

The statute for the ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution (Article 17(1)(a)). This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.”

Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case, defendants are scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.

Violation 1 — The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects.7

Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other medical ethics guidance and laws, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965, which binds practicing physicians to “act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”

While not binding law, the complaint argues that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law by way of Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which recognizes international law, international treaties, international custom, and principles of law recognized by civilized nations as being of equal value.

Violation 2 — Genocide

Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. Here, the group in question is the British population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with the elderly, chronically ill, and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:

  • Killing
  • Causing serious bodily or mental harm
  • Imposing measures intended to reduce fertility
  • Deliberately inflicting conditions of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial destruction

All of these definitions apply in this case, and details are provided to support each charge. For example, with regard to “conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction,” this includes both the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth through imposed lockdowns and damaging people’s immune systems through the refusal to offer early treatment, mask mandates, and coercing people to take the COVID jab.

Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity

Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, which includes: Murder, Extermination, Imprisonment or severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental law, Torture, Enforced sterilizations, Persecution of any identifiable group, Apartheid, and other inhumane acts.

The specific charges under each are detailed in the complaint, with data to support them.

Violation 4 — War Crimes

War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that “a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines.” They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the intent to commit a crime, stating that:

“… the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines.’

We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”

War crimes listed in the complaint include:

Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID jabs, the use of lethal doses of midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed with COVID, and the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in the shots.

Not only are they asking for a full investigation into the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in some of the COVID shots, they also want a full investigation into the suspected assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist and a top graphene expert. Noack’s doctoral thesis described the conversion of graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide. According to the complaint:

“Professor Dr. Pablo Campra comes from the university of Almeria, and alongside Dr. Andreas Noack he examined the covid ‘vaccines’ for the presence of graphene oxide with the Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. According to both doctors, the vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide but do contain graphene hydroxide.

On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients …

On 18th November 2020 Dr. Andreas Noack was on a ‘livestream’ on YouTube discussing the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ when he was arrested on camera by armed German police (Appendix 41). On 26th November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide (Appendix 42) he was attacked and murdered.

We request a full investigation be done into the inclusion of Graphene hydroxide in theCovid-19 ‘vaccines’ and into the assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack.”

Torture by way of forced mask-wearing, the use of test swabs containing carcinogenic chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon.
Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples include the forced use of masks, the closing of doctors’ offices, the COVID jab mandates, the use of psychological warfare, the use of economic warfare, the use of biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of alternative treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm, and euthanizing elderly COVID patients with midazolam.
Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part in any hostilities.
Intentionally launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.
Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression

The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According to the complaint:

“This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions.

It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other world leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ‘s Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth.

In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfilment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.

This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.”

New Findings Will “Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry”

In a January 1, 2022, video announcement (featured at the top of this article), Dr. Reiner Fuellmich8 — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and co-founder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss)9,10,11 launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have in their possession is “enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”

Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they also have evidence that the vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the public.

According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. In other words, people have not been getting identical products. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different ingredients.

According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have “hard evidence” of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.12

In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500 different Pfizer jab batches, with some having toxicity, as evidenced by deaths, that is 3,000 times above the baseline. Others have toxicity that is 2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batches with no deaths attributed to them.

Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the vaccine makers appear to have coordinated and synchronized their experimentation so that only one of them is releasing a potentially deadly batch at a time. But they’re all doing this. They’re all experimenting with dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they’re able to do this is that there are no review boards overseeing any of them.

There’s now an interesting site where you can search the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data based on your lot number, to see if you got one of the more dangerous batches. You can find that dashboard here.13 The video below explains how to use the dashboard.

“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation,” Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, then there is no legal immunity for anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for injuries and deaths.

Without a doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn’t mean we don’t try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the criminals behind this global takeover to justice, and hold them accountable for everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health, and our children’s futures.

– Sources and References

Saturday Bullet Points: January 22, 2022

Interesting things happened non-stop this past week in every sector of Americans’ lives. COVID-19 is always in the news; Joe Biden’s plummeting approval ratings are daily news — because they decline every day! Of course, Biden’s policies in healthcare, foreign policy, and the economy are daily items that are actually one thing, and Biden describes them as ANOTHER thing. There’s one commonality that holds the entire Biden Administration together: chaos. While Democrats in Congress and across the nation have firmly supported this president, this past week, we saw the cracks in that support that are larger than even I thought they were. So let’s get to the facts of the week in our Saturday Bullet Points.

Bullet Points

  • Here we go again. It appears that another federal judge has jumped on Biden’s vaccine mandate, labeling it “beyond the authority of the President.” This one is about the mandate for all federal employees — which is a bit of a shock. What are the details? What did the judge say in his ruling? For complete details, click on this link:
  • U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov had a brief meeting in Geneva this Friday, Jan. 21, aimed at averting the armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and initial reports indicate that the officials had a “frank” and positive talk and reached a truce until next week. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Is it too early to talk specifics about the midterm elections that are now just months away? Remember this: every one of the 435 U.S. House of Representatives seats is up for grabs. They all are always for two-year terms. The U.S. Senate seats are constitutionally set at six years, which are staggered. Conventional wisdom is that the House is likely to turn red in November. The Democrats currently have the slimmest of majorities. And close to 30 Democrats representatives have already announced they’re not running. That’s the House. But what about the Senate? We’ve got the info! For complete details, click on this link:
  • Gabbie Petito’s murder has always been thought to be Brian Laundrie — her fiance. But the FBI has either not known or kept that knowledge close to the vest. But Laundrie’s notebook, we discovered on Friday, solved the mystery. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Who will ever forget the uproar regarding vote-counting during the 2020 election? And, for some reason, the state of Georgia has been the epicenter for all the uproar. Numerous Americans — including former President Trump — feel certain that Georgia’s election results confirmed by the Governor were NOT accurate. One man in Texas remains incensed about those allegations, so much so that he threatened Georgia election officials! What did he do? Well, it was enough to get the FBI on his trail. For complete details, click on this link:
  • The uproar in the United States Senate this past week over the screams from the Left across the nation to kill the filibuster dominated the news. Though the Senate is split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, several Democrat Senators were flies in the legislative buttermilk that ruined Democrats’ chances to pass the socialist Build Back Better bill and the onerous Voter Rights bill. But Senators Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ), who were the targets of the entire Democrat Party for refusing to support the elimination of the filibuster, were NOT the real culprits in this disastrous loss for Democrats? Who was the “King without a Crown?” For complete details, click on this link:
  • One of the most distasteful things about flying these days is going through security, allowing TSA to do whatever they want to prove we’re not terrorists. (Have you ever forgotten something in your purse or briefcase that got you in trouble?) Presenting an ID to prove who you are is much of a big deal: most have driver’s licenses or passports. But one large group of people can waltz through airport security without either. Who are they, and what proof of identification is required from them? You will NOT believe this! For complete details, click on this link:
  • Our COVID-19 pandemic has put a damper on our ability to receive sufficient numbers of numerous items across the board sufficient to allow us to live “normal” lives. International shipping is atrocious. Every part of it is mindboggling. And the shortage of many vital items necessary to keep our economy chugging along has negatively impacted our abilities to purchase goods like never before. One of those items is new automobiles. The big problem: computer chips. But there’s a fix in the air! Intel, who manufactures the computer chips that run just about every electronic gizmo in our lives, announced they’re building a factory that will be the largest computer chip manufacturer on the planet. Guess where’s it’s going? For complete details, click on this link:
  • Abortion is under attack from all sides. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to stop the new Texas abortion law on Friday. They did NOT rule on the law itself but refused to stop its enforcement in Texas while several other lawsuits are pending. However, with the uproar at epic volume, Americans have weighed in a poll regarding abortion that is very surprising. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Everyone in the U.S. recognizes that Florida has been the most successful state at managing life for Floridians during the COVID-19 pandemic. Governor DeSantis has, again and again, thumbed his nose at the Biden Administration for their egregious policies that have cost the nation and Americans dearly and altered lives forever. Florida has refused to accept the Biden Administrations’ mandates for operating their schools. They’ve been open for the duration! This week, Jen Psaki, White House Press Secretary, made a fool of herself when she blasted Florida for mishandling federal funds earmarked to help keep schools open across the nation. There’s a problem: Florida’s schools never closed! For complete details, click on this link:
  • The fight over the amount of the minimum wage has seemed eternal. The concept was never considered a “living wage,” which is an amount of money sufficient for one’s 100% financial support. It was designed to serve two purposes: to incentivize companies to hire young workers to train for their careers at the beginning of their work lives and to pay these young workers for their work as “interns” while they learn and actual trade. But the current minimum wage levels have NEVER been sufficient for those on the Left. They actually want the minimum wage to be a “living wage.” Joe Biden has decided to step in and pander to those leftists and announced a new federal minimum wage. What is it? For complete details, click on this link:
  • Joe Biden is really screwing up the necessary process to stop Russia from invading Ukraine. Though pressured by many in his own party to inform the Russian president that if he invades Ukraine, the U.S. will respond militarily, Biden refuses to do so and is soft-pedaling his “threats” of serious financial sanctions against Russia if they do so. That’s hilarious: Biden thinks he can gaslight Vladimir Putin! If Trump had tried the same thing, he’d have been impeached. What’s going on? For complete details, click on this link:
  • The U.S. Secretary of State Blinken has been in talks with his Russian counterpart to prevent war. Friday, Blinken offered Vladimir Putin a summit with President Biden in a last-ditch effort to avoid war in Ukraine. Many are holding their breaths, awaiting Putin’s response. However, conventional wisdom is that the U.S. waited too long to make the offer, and Putin is already “on the go.” For complete details, click on this link:

Big Brother Really IS Watching…

At least 25 federal agencies have implemented a system to track religious exemption requests for mandated vaccines, according to a review of Federal Register notices. The agencies include the departments of Justice, Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, the Treasury, the Social Security Administration, the Federal Election Commission.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative group, earlier this week found that 19 agencies were either considering or have already implemented the tracking system. The group warned that the system may be a test pilot plan to monitor all federal workers. A TruthNewsNetwork review of Federal Register notices identified six additional agencies and confirmed that a total of 25 are actively tracking religious exemption requests from employees of federal agencies along with any contractors, consultants, interns, and volunteers associated with them.

Due to the Biden administration’s choice of the little-known Pretrial Services Agency to implement the database, The Heritage Foundation called the system a “test run” for a nationwide database of all religious exemption requests made by federal workers. The Pretrial Services Agency gathers information and makes recommendations about newly arrested defendants in the federal criminal system.

“It is likely the Biden administration is using these agencies to stealth test a policy it intends to roll out across the whole government,” attorneys for the foundation wrote in an analysis of the tracking system. Notices of the new tracking system were only made public in the Federal Register, the daily journal of the federal government. News of the system drew criticism from conservative officials.

“The Biden Administration must immediately dismantle the Orwellian Database,” Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt wrote in a public comment he posted on regulations.gov. “There is no freedom under our Constitution more sacred than the freedom of religious expression and practice.” He called the move “alarming” and said it had “a chilling effect on a citizen’s exercise of religion.” The attorney general directed his comments specifically to Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg. “Rather than give the public ample time to weigh in on the advisability or legality of collecting such personal information, the Department of Transportation’s database, in particular, became effective on the day it was published,” Schmitt said.

None of the notices published in the Federal Register announcing the tracking systems state why the religious exemptions were being tracked or what the Biden administration plans to do with the information collected. Descriptions of the religious exemption tracking system don’t specifically name the COVID-19 vaccination as one of the mandates. However, the notices do state that the new system is in response to guidelines issued by the newly created Safer Federal Workforce Task Force under Biden’s executive order that established the nationwide COVID-19 vaccine mandate.

“This system of records maintains personal religious information collected in response to religious accommodation requests for religious exception from the federally mandated vaccination requirement in the context of a public health emergency or similar health and safety incident, such as a pandemic, epidemic, natural disaster or national or regional,” one of the notices reads. The tracking system will include names and personal religious information, according to the notices.

“As the nation’s largest employer, with over four million civilian and military employees, the federal government has received tens of thousands of religious exemption requests,” The Heritage Foundation wrote in its updated report. “It now appears that an increasing number of federal agencies are keeping and preserving those individuals’ names, religious information, personally-identifying information, and other data stored in lists across multiple government agencies.”

Last week, the Supreme Court struck down President Joe Biden’s executive order that mandated a COVID-19 vaccine or weekly testing workers at private businesses with more than 100 employees. The court didn’t overturn the vaccination mandate for health care workers or military members. Those employees can only avoid the COVID-19 vaccine by applying for a religious exemption.

If you feel like this tracking of Americans who have filed vaccine religious exemptions is something new (or different) for the federal government, think again:

The government secretly orders Google to track anyone searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers

The U.S. government is reportedly secretly issuing warrants for Google to provide user data on anyone typing in certain search terms, raising fears that innocent online users could get caught up in serious crime investigations at a greater frequency than previously thought.

In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new “keyword warrants” and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim’s name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows.

Google has to respond to thousands of warrant orders each year, but the keyword warrants are a relatively new strategy used by the government and are controversial.

“Trawling through Google’s search history database enables police to identify people merely based on what they might have been thinking about, for whatever reason, at some point in the past,” Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told Forbes. “This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame is not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation,” she added.

The government said that the scope of the warrants is limited to “avoid implicating innocent people who happen to search for certain terms,” but it’s not publicly disclosed how many users’ data are sent to the government and what the extent of the warrant requests are.

Google has defended its decision to respond to the warrants and said it protects users when doing so. “As with all law enforcement requests, we have a rigorous process that is designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” a Google spokesperson said.

“Big Brother’s” Not Done Yet

Nat’l Security Agency Monitoring Op-Center

Here are thirteen “other” ways the federal government keeps tabs on Americans. And they’ve been doing so for years:

One. The National Security Agency (NSA) collects hundreds of millions of emails, texts, and phone calls every day and has the ability to collect and sift through billions more. WIRED just reported NSA is building an immense new data center that will intercept, analyze and store even more electronic communications from satellites and cables across the nation and the world. Though NSA is not supposed to focus on US citizens, it does.

Two. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) National Security Branch Analysis Center (NSAC) has more than 1.5 billion government and private sector records about US citizens collected from commercial databases, government information, and criminal probes.

Three. The American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Times recently reported that the cellphones of private individuals in the US are being tracked without warrants by state and local law enforcement all across the country. With more than 300 million cellphones in the US connected to more than 200,000 cell phone towers, cellphone tracking software can pinpoint the location of a phone and document the places the cellphone user visits over the course of a day, week, month, or longer.

Four. More than 62 million people in the US have their fingerprints on file with the FBI, state, and local governments. This system, called the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS), shares information with 43 states and 5 federal agencies. This system conducts more than 168,000 checks each day.

Five. Over 126 million people have their fingerprints, photographs, and biographical information accessible on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT). This system conducts about 250,000 biometric transactions each day. The goal of this system is to provide information for national security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, and other Homeland Security Functions.

Six. More than 110 million people have their visas and more than 90 million have their photographs entered into the U.S. Department of State Consular Consolidated Database (CCD). This system grows by adding about 35,000 people a day. This system serves as a gateway to the Department of State Facial Recognition system, IDENT, and IAFSIS.

Seven. DNA profiles on more than 10 million people are available in the FBI coordinated Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) National DNA Index.

Eight. Information on more than 2 million people is kept in the Intelligence Community Security Clearance Repository, commonly known as Scattered Castles. Most of the people in this database are employees of the Department of Defense (DOD) and other intelligence agencies.

Nine. The DOD also has an automated biometric identification system (ABIS) to support military operations overseas. This database incorporates fingerprint, palm print, face, and iris matching on 6 million people and is adding 20,000 more people each day.

Ten. Information on over 740,000 people is included in the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) of the National Counterterrorism Center. TIDE is the U.S. government’s central repository of information on international terrorist identities. The government says that less than 2 percent of the people on file are U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents. They were just given permission to keep their non-terrorism information on U.S. citizens for a period of five years, up from 180 days.

Eleven. Tens of thousands of people are subjects of facial recognition software. The FBI has been working with the North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles and other state and local law enforcement on facial recognition software in a project called “Face Mask.” For example, the FBI has provided thousands of photos and names to the North Carolina DMV which runs those against their photos of North Carolina drivers. The Maricopa Arizona County Sheriff’s Office alone records 9,000 biometric mug shots a month.

Twelve. The FBI operates the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative (SAR) that collects and analyzes observations or reports of suspicious activities by local law enforcement. With over 160,000 suspicious activity files, SAR stores the profiles of tens of thousands of Americans and legal residents who are not accused of any crime but who are alleged to have acted suspiciously.

Thirteen. The FBI admits it has about 3,000 GPS tracking devices on cars of unsuspecting people in the US right now, even after the US Supreme Court decision authorizing these only after a warrant for probable cause has been issued.


Yes, some call people who actually believe that George Orwell got it right about “Big Brother” in his novel 1984 “conspiracy theorists,” and the belief that the federal government is actually surveilling private Americans a “conspiracy theory.” Call it what you will, it actually IS happening.

How do we know that?

Besides the above verified, documented, and truthful information, put on your memory cap: remember the fraudulent affidavit filed by FBI Director James Comey to beg the FISA Court to issue a warrant to surveil the Donald Trump campaign headquarters? That application for that warrant contained fraudulent information that the FBI added to illegally obtain that warrant!

That is not “opinion.” It actually happened…and it happened again…and it happened again…and it happened one more time!

And it continues to happen in scary numbers of ways that we have no idea are being used.

Big Brother’s real.

They’re Coming To Take You Away

 Almost half of Democratic voters — 48 percent — think the government should be able to fine or imprison individuals “who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines on social media, television, radio, or in online or digital publications.”

This is not the most astonishing finding of a poll just released by Rasmussen. Let’s go through the relevant points: Nearly the same percentage of Democratic voters — 47 percent — think the government should be able to put a tracking system, like an ankle monitor or a locked collar, on people who refuse the vaccine. And 45 percent favor putting the unvaccinated in camps. Camps.

More than half of Democratic voters — 55 percent — think people who refuse the vaccine should be fined. Fifty-nine percent favor confining all unvaccinated people to their homes. More than a quarter of Democratic voters — 29 percent — think that the government should be able to confiscate the children of unvaccinated parents.

Is any of this Nazi enough for you yet? You are living next door to the people who would have turned you over to the Comité de Salut public for opposing the “Law of Suspects” — the law that authorized the arrest of all suspected enemies of the Revolution and ushered in the Reign of Terror. You are living next door to the people who would have turned you over to the NKVD for “moral sabotage of the Soviet Union.” You are living next door to the people who would have called up the Gestapo and said, “My neighbor is hiding a Jew.”

Examine these historical personages from Revolutionary France, Soviet Russia, or Nazi Germany (or Nazi France).  It’s not just that they were following orders. On the contrary, they thought they were doing a positive good for society. They were eager to help rid their community of dangerous elements. They were proud of what they did. 

Some of your Democratic neighbors will likewise be proud to lock you up, put a tracking collar on your neck, take away your children — all for the public good. These are people who would murder you for the public good.  And this is the inevitable result of raising up generations of Americans without any fundamental attachment to freedom.

Freedom of speech, freedom of action, freedom of conscience: Our public schools told us these things were ubiquitous and natural, so there was nothing special about America having them. There was nothing special about anyone having them. And because leftists don’t realize just how hard our ancestors had to fight for these unique and historically unprecedented rights, they’re not shocked or even sad to see them taken away. On the contrary, your neighbors think your attachment to these rights is precisely what makes you dangerous.

My high school taught a little unit on the German excuse for World War II. This was the excuse designed by Hitler’s architect and Minister of War Armaments Albert Speer at the Nuremberg Trials. Speer thought that only one thing could save the German people from being tarred for all history with their irredeemable and totally enveloping sin: The leaders (including Speer) would have to take the fault entirely on themselves and say, “Our people didn’t know what they were doing; they were just following orders.”

And this excuse has worked extremely well. Our high school teachers will discuss this, and ask us if we think that following orders is a legitimate excuse for doing evil. They fail to see how this has reframed the entire question: The question is not whether following orders is a good excuse. The question, which we no longer ask, is whether following orders was actually the motivation.

Because of course it was not. Nazis weren’t just ordered to be Nazis. French collaborators weren’t just ordered to collaborate. Chinese students of the Cultural Revolution weren’t just ordered to murder their teachers in ways too ugly to describe here. These people relished what they did. And such was the purity of their commitment that they were willing to turn against friends and even family. Indeed, destroying something you love for the sake of the Revolution is the highest proof there can be of your personal goodness.

Your Democratic neighbors won’t be ordered to vote for laws that ostracize you from society, steal your property, or send you away to a concentration camp. They will do it burning with pride and even with righteous indignation against you for forcing them to these extremes. They’ve already done it in New Zealand and Australia and Canada—places our schools taught us were identical to America in terms of rights and freedoms.

This is one reason why Americans cling to their guns. Private gun rights have nothing to do with hunting. It does have to do with self-defense against the common criminal. But the big reason we cling to our guns is so that, when our neighbors show up and say, “We’re going to take you to the camps now, because you’re a danger to society,” we can look back at them and say, “Like hell you will.”


Note: NO Jewish people — or even German citizens, for that matter — gave even a thought that Hitler’s jackboot thugs would ever round up Jewish people to send to concentration camps to be summarily “eliminated:” until it happened.

NO one thought that egregious totalitarian government lockdowns virtually stopped EVERYTHING in this nation from functioning as normal: until it did.

NO one thought that our grocery stores would sustain massive shortages or distributors of thousands of different items used by Americans would ever dry up and create a serious lack of essentials for Americans: until it did.

NO Japanese immigrant who settled in California felt during the beginnings of World War II felt it possible that being thrown into “internment camps” in the United States could ever happen: until it did.

NO Australian thought it possible that the police, on the order of the Aussie government, would lock citizens of their country in their homes because of a virus: until it did.

And this “good” news published Wednesday, January 19, 2022, from Rasmussen:

“Nearly half of Democrat voters would back measures requiring that the unvaccinated live temporarily in “designated facilities or locations” for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine, a recent poll has found.

A national telephone and online poll from the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports, which surveyed 1,016 likely U.S. voters, found that 45 percent of likely Democratic voters would support such measures for unvaccinated Americans.”

Don’t be tempted to ever say, “Nothing like these things will EVER happen to me.”

It would be prudent for all Americans to stay wide awake, watching the actions of this government, and question EVERY action it takes.

Can The CDC Get Anything Else Dead-Wrong?

From the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, the PCR test has been a source of unrelenting controversy, with experts repeatedly pointing out that it’s not a valid diagnostic and produces inordinate amounts of false positives.

Importantly, a PCR test cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 “Doctors for Disaster Preparedness” lecture, media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness in order to create the appearance of a pandemic.

Furthermore, a PCR test cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, stated this in those exact words.

Almost universally, health authorities have also instructed labs to use excessively high cycle thresholds (CTs) — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — thereby ensuring a maximum of false positives.

From the start, experts noted that a CT over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable, yet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended running PCR tests at a CT of 40, and the World Health Organization recommended a CT of 45.

The pandemic of false positives was then used by world governments to implement pandemic countermeasures that have destroyed the global economy, ruined countless lives, decimated the education of an entire generation and stripped us of basic human rights and freedoms.

Time and again, the goal post for ending the pandemic theater has been moved, and the justifications for continuing the life-destroying countermeasures have become increasingly laughable. The fearmongering over Omicron, for example, makes no rational sense based on the data available, which shows the variant is among the mildest so far, and far less likely to infect and damage the lungs.

CDC Cuts Isolation Recommendation in Half

In the last days of December 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued yet another illogical protocol change. People who test positive for SARS-CoV-2, or have known exposure, but remain asymptomatic, now only need to isolate for five days rather than the previous 10, but should wear a mask for another five days when at work or in public. Also, they don’t need to get retested at the end of their quarantine. The stated reason? Because:

  1. The majority of viral transmission (85% to 90%) occurs in the first day or two before symptom onset, and two to three days after symptom onset
  2. The PCR test can remain positive for up to 12 weeks after you’ve recovered from the infection

How is it that the CDC didn’t realize until now that the PCR test was picking up dead viral debris for three months after infection? The facts that the test, a) was far too sensitive, and b) couldn’t identify active infection, were criticisms from the start. What the CDC’s belated admission means is that, for the past two years, Americans have unnecessarily wasted time in self-isolation — perhaps weeks — waiting for a negative test.

In a December 30, 2021, appearance on MSNBC, Dr. Anthony Fauci responded to questions about the updated CDC guidance. CDC director Rochelle Walensky also tried to make sense of the new guidance in a December 29, 2021, ABC News interview.

Neither of them offered any explanation as for why the CDC didn’t change the rules sooner, and only now decided that keeping noninfectious people in isolation for days and weeks on end might not be so good after all.

Walensky did make a rather telling comment on CNN, though, when asked about the reasoning behind the shortened isolation guidance. “It really had a lot to do with what we thought people would be able to tolerate,” she said. Some have understandably translated that as “how much tyranny we thought people would be able to tolerate.”

Differing Rules for Health Care Workers

The CDC has not given up on making the guidance as confusing as possible though. December 23, 2021, they also updated guidance for health care workers, stating that “Health care workers with COVID-19 who are asymptomatic can return to work after seven days with a negative test, and that isolation time can be cut further if there are staffing shortages.”

In his MSNBC interview, Fauci was asked why health care workers are being treated differently, having to isolate for seven days rather than five, and still have to get a negative test, when the test can falsely remain positive for up to 12 weeks? What data supports this, and is it publicly available?

According to Fauci, the data to support this difference “is internal to the CDC,” but really, there’s “no specific data” to back it up, he adds. The CDC merely made “a judgment call.”

Double-Jabbed Treated the Same as Unvaccinated

The CDC’s updated guidance also puts those who have received two doses of the COVID shot in the same category as the unvaccinated, so when it comes to isolating after exposure, they have to follow the same rules, whereas those who have received a booster shot follow a different set of guidelines. As explained by the CDC:

“For people who are unvaccinated or are more than six months out from their second mRNA dose (or more than 2 months after the J&J vaccine) and not yet boosted, CDC now recommends quarantine for 5 days followed by strict mask use for an additional 5 days.

Alternatively, if a 5-day quarantine is not feasible, it is imperative that an exposed person wear a well-fitting mask at all times when around others for 10 days after exposure. Individuals who have received their booster shot do not need to quarantine following an exposure, but should wear a mask for 10 days after the exposure.

For all those exposed, best practice would also include a test for SARS-CoV-2 at day 5 after exposure. If symptoms occur, individuals should immediately quarantine until a negative test confirms symptoms are not attributable to COVID-19.”

Fauci defended the decision to treat the double-jabbed as if they’re unvaccinated saying that those who have received a booster shot have far greater protection against the Omicron variant, compared to those who have only received one or two doses.

“When you’re infected, you’re infected,” Fauci said, and it doesn’t matter whether you’re vaccinated or not. The viral load is the same, so the risk of spreading the infection is the same. Those who have been boosted are less likely to be infected or carry a large viral load, hence they don’t need to isolate.

PCR Cannot Tell You Anything About Contagiousness

Fauci was also asked about how one can measure contagiousness. If the PCR can register positive for 12 weeks after an infection, it can’t be a reliable indicator of infectiousness. This was precisely the point that Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, attempted to make in the video at the top with respect to PCR and HIV.

So, how can we tell if we’re infectious or not? Fauci confirmed that the PCR can only tell you there’s a presence or absence of viral fragments, not whether it’s an active infection, or whether you’re actually infectious. He did not, however, provide an answer to the question as to how one can measure contagiousness.

Rapid Test Doesn’t Pick Up Omicron

Yet another confounding factor in this mess is that the rapid test apparently doesn’t pick up Omicron very well. Your viral load needs to be very high at the time of testing in order for the rapid test to recognize it.

This admission came within days of president Biden’s announcement that the federal government will distribute half a billion free rapid tests to homes around the country in 2022.

It seems like a waste of resources, seeing how Omicron is starting to take over, but who knows, maybe it will pick up the common cold instead, allowing the “case” count to remain high enough to keep the charade going.

What’s the Real Death Count?

The CDC’s belated admission that the PCR test can’t identify active infection raises another question: What does this mean for those who died with a positive test? Did they actually have an active infection? If not, should they have been designated as COVID deaths?

The obvious answer to the last two questions is, of course, no. The vast majority were likely false positives, and the real death toll from COVID-19 considerably lower than we’re led to believe. The CDC undoubtedly knew this all along, seeing how they’ve been relentlessly criticized for their recommendation to run the PCR at a CT of 40. They’re trying to pretend that they just realized this, but that’s simply not believable.


Beginning in March of 2020, we at TruthNewsNetwork shared our daily-intensifying suspicions that all things with the CDC and Dr. Anthony Fauci were not “totally” accurate. We didn’t know then (and still do not for certain today) that there was corruption afoot in the mixed messaging we heard daily. But what other explanation is there that makes sense?

Let’s be honest: throughout Fauci’s tenure as our “COVID-19 God” he has filled our eyes and ears with incorrect “facts.” (There are no such things) And when confronted for his misinformation, his sole response is to denigrate the person(s) who are asking about his unfactual facts.

There are some things that we really need to get our arms around to save people serious illness and death from coronavirus. And getting these facts supersedes ANYTHING that concerns Dr. Fauci. He’s at best a figurehead representing the U.S. healthcare system but has failed miserably in that task.

The questions to ask which demand answers are simple:

  1. What and where is the source of coronavirus?
  2. Are the hospital protocols that are ironclad across the nation accurate and proven medically successful? If not, why are they being used?
  3. What did the CDC so adamantly demand not using therapeutics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin for two years when they knew that were proving to be effective against COVID?
  4. Why did the CDC introduce the vaccines as the singular effective treatment for COVID when they knew that was false?
  5. What financial stake in the vaccine process does Dr. Fauci and any other individuals or groups hold?
  6. This is the big one: Why are healthcare institution managers putting their workers in the streets after these are the ones who sacrificed their lives daily when the pandemic first began? What do. These healthcare bureaucrats have in this egregious policy?

Sadly, even if we get good and honest answers to these questions, we’ll still have twice as many as these six that need answers. And, purposely, we may never get those answers.

Here’s another question, number 7: Why do we get even one false answer to any one of these questions?

Honestly, we may never get answers on which we can rely. It appears the U.S. healthcare system has been compromised for political purposes by this flock of bureaucrats portrayed to us as “the” sole arbiters of Truth in our pandemic. That should cause pause, if not anger, for every American.

We simply NEED the truth.


Who Really “Chose” Trump’s Three Supreme Court Justice Nominees?

Editor’s Note: This is actually a documentary piece that should be treated as a treatise. I urge all to take the time to follow the links and verify for yourself the accuracy of the content of this story. Our Special Correspondent Kelleigh Nelson painstakingly takes time to investigate, document, and write factual “treatises” for all of us. This is one of her most in-depth investigative pieces.


We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force. Ayn Rand

The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government. Thomas Jefferson

Threats to the rule of law come not only from rioters and looters in the streets but also from activist judges on the bench. Tom Fitton

Bullying wasn’t okay in elementary school and it isn’t okay now, especially when it comes in the form of a U.S. Supreme Court decision. John Doolittle, former CA Congressman

Anyone who still believes President Trump’s three chosen supreme court justices are true Constitutional Conservatives has not been paying attention. Not one of them even follows the US Constitution. What is so discouraging is that they take turns being on the side of those who vote against our constitution and against American citizens. Watch how they vote and you’ll notice that one of the three will always side with Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Breyer.

So, how did Trump choose these three judges, or did he? Two organizations were chosen to submit lists of “conservative” nominees for Trump.


Heritage Foundation

In response to hearing the two organizations who were to choose the list of Supreme Court nominees, my column, President Trump, Heritage Foundation is Controlled Opposition, was published on December 12, 2016.

Over the past 35 years, Heritage has also been funded by private foundations such as Pew Charitable Trust which also funded many GOALS 2000 initiatives. Bill Clinton signed the Goals 2000 law on March 31, 1994, creating new education bureaucracies and facilitating federal control of local education institutions. William Greider’s bestseller, Who Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy reveals other benefactors, “Heritage received grants from Amoco, General Motors, Chase Manhattan Bank (David Rockefeller) and right-wing foundations like Olin and Bradley.”

Koch organizations support Heritage as well as private donors including some who are members of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations and many who were pro-abortion.

Stuart M. Butler, a Brit who is a senior fellow at the liberal Brookings Institute, the same Institute that is promoting the privatization of education, wrote a monograph for Heritage entitled Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans. Please pay particular attention to Item #2 on page 6 of this document wherein it states, “Mandate all households to obtain adequate insurance.”

The idea of creating a North American free trade zone was first proposed by Heritage Distinguished Fellow and Council on Foreign Relations member, Richard Allen, in the late 1970s, refined by then Presidential candidate Ronald Reagan, and further developed in a major 1986 Heritage Foundation study.

There is also a strong Rockefeller/Heritage connection. Edwin Feulner, former President of Heritage Foundation, who strongly supported the U.S.-Soviet education agreements, and who had an office in Moscow, supported Soviet-style magnet schools (i.e., tax-supported choice/charter schools), and had state affiliate organizations across the nation writing charter school legislation that reads as though it was written by the U.S. Department of Education, the Carnegie Corporation and the National Education Association.

Vice President Michael Pence

The “trustworthy” and devout “Christian” Vice President was more than willing to tell the politically naïve President that Heritage was a conservative think tank who would guide him to Constitutionally Conservative judges for the Supreme Court.

Like the majority of others our 45th President hired for his administration, he failed to vet his choice for vice president. Had he done so, he would have found out that the two closest congressional friends of Mike Pence were Paul Ryan and Jeff Flake, both enemies of President Trump. He also would have known that Pence had been funded by the Koch brother’s foundations and Richard and Betsy DeVos from the inception of his political aspirations, both of whom were enemies of Trump.

Pence and Heritage are old friends. Three decades ago, it was The Heritage Foundation’s influence that inspired Pence to help create a think tank in his home state of Indiana. In 1991, Pence became president of the Indiana Policy Review Foundation (IPRF), which is part of the State Policy Network in Indiana. Link They are satellite affiliates of the Heritage Foundation whose goals and interests are similar to the Koch organizations. The IPRF was a small group back when Pence was their president, but in the years since, it has amassed an enormous budget thanks in great part to the largess of the Koch network of donors and others.

After coming to Washington as a congressman and later as vice president, Pence frequently collaborated with Heritage. Mike Pence joined The Heritage Foundation as a distinguished visiting fellow in February 2021 after serving four years as President Trump’s VP.

Pence has also started a podcast and will be writing a monthly op-ed and speaking at conferences and colleges in his new capacity as the Ronald Reagan Presidential Scholar at conservative Young America’s Foundation. YAF is an associate member of the State Policy Network. The foundation was founded at the home of neo-con William F. Buckley, (CFR, CIA and Skull and Bones) and is heavily funded by Koch brother organizations and famous icons of the neo-con rightwing including former Amway executives Richard and Helen DeVos and Morton Blackwell’s Leadership Institute.

I have written numerous articles about VP Pence, now referred to as Benedict Arnold Pence for his actions on January 6th, 2020. If you still believe Pence is a man of integrity and faith, I would hope you’d take the time to read the series of articles exposing this man.

Judas Mike Pence Joins Aaron Burr and Benedict Arnold, Part One

Mike Pence, Water Boy for the Deep State, Part Two

Satan’s Minions, the Financiers of Michael R. Pence, Part 3

VP Pence never excelled at anything President Trump assigned him to oversee. And he was the one who chose Drs. Fauci, Birx, and Redfield to lead the COVID Task Force. Those three Deep State insiders helped to destroy President Donald J. Trump and this country. The transfer of billions to the big box stores and Big Pharma along with the destruction of small businesses and the middle class will never be recovered.

Mike Pence and Kellyanne Conway have been close friends for decades. Kellyanne worked for Mike when he was in Congress. She is also affiliated with the Kochs, and she and Pence even have family members who have intermarried.

The Federalist Society

In late January 2017, The Federalist Society, Friend or Foe was published. Kellyanne Conway and her Trump-hating husband, George, have been members of the Society for years. They joined because it was “pro-life.”

The Federalist Society began at Yale Law School, (home of Skull and Bones), Harvard Law School (that bastion of higher liberal learning), and the University of Chicago Law School, (home of Bill Ayers and where protestors disallowed a 2016 Trump rally). It originally started as a student organization that challenged what its members perceived as the orthodox American liberal ideology found in most law schools. Yet, these three Ivy League schools are known as having a Marxist agenda.

The Society’s notable membership has included Supreme Court justices Antonin ScaliaClarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito. Justice Scalia actually served as the original faculty advisor to the organization. Other members include Pro-Constitutional Convention Professor Randy Barnett of Georgetown University; Former Energy Secretary, David Schizer who clerked for Ruth Bader Ginsberg; and Alex Kozinski, former Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The Society was also started by a group of prominent so-called conservatives, including former Attorney General Edwin Meese; Solicitor General and Reagan Supreme Court nominee, Robert Bork; former Indiana Congressman, David McIntosh, head of pro-amnesty and anti-Trump Club of Growth; Lee Liberman Otis; former Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham and Steven Calabresi.

In 2013, the Federalist Society held their annual dinner with guest speakers Supreme Court Justices Alito and Thomas, and Federal Appellate Judge Diane Sykes. This was a $200-per-plate black-tie fundraising dinner, funded in part by the Koch brothers. Link

“By headlining this fundraiser, Judge Sykes is clearly in violation of the Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges and Justice Thomas would be as well—if only the Supreme Court was bound by an ethical code,” Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) said in a statement. The ethical codes are there to ensure that outside interests do not sway judicial decisions.

Sponsors for the dinner are recognizable names like Chevron, Verizon, Google, Facebook, and Time Warner, none of whom are pro-life standard-bearers.

Many of the links exposing who was at this dinner have been removed, but among those who gave $100,000 are the following:

Koch Industries, David Koch, and their Claude Lambe Foundation each gave $100,000. David Koch was pro-abortion.

Google and Microsoft are among donors who gave $100,000 or more, according to the society’s annual report for 2015. Neither Google nor Microsoft has ever been pro-lifers.

The Sarah Scaife Foundation is a big donor. Sarah Scaife was the mother of wealthy businessman Richard Mellon Scaife, who donated up to $30 million to the Heritage Foundation. Scaife funded Planned Parenthood and even took an ad out in the WSJ promoting taxpayer funding of abortion. His mother, Sarah, had Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger, into her home every Sunday afternoon for tea.

Those donating $25,000 to $49,000 included:

Amway Multi-Marketing Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation. These are the in-laws of Betsy DeVos, former education secretary, and Verizon.

In the final category are Delta Airlines, ExxonMobil Corporation, Facebook, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pepsi, Co. None of whom support life.

Kellyanne Conway

Kellyanne was Donald Trump’s campaign manager after Ted Cruz lost his bid for the same. Conway was also employed by the Cruz campaign as a strategist for Keep the Promise I, a pro-Cruz super-PAC, bankrolled by hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer, who ran attack ads against Trump during the primary campaign, including one blasting the real estate mogul for supposedly supporting government-run healthcare, which of course wasn’t true. Robert Mercer then switched to a Super Pac which is running attack ads against Hillary Clinton.

While working for Ted Cruz, she consistently disparaged Donald Trump, but then went to work for him as his Senior Counselor after he was elected. The scandal-laden anti-Trump group, The Lincoln Project, was co-founded by Kellyanne’s husband, George Conway.

George and Kellyanne are members of the Federalist Society and give $50 to 100K per year to the Society.


Working together and being friends for decades, it was only logical that Pence would suggest Heritage Foundation and Kellyanne would suggest the Federalist Society choose conservative judges for Trump’s Supreme Court nominees. Both of these people are Deep State insiders or “controlled opposition” at the least. Few true conservatives endorsed and stood by Donald J. Trump through four years of unmitigated attacks against his person and his administration.

Kellyanne Conway left Trump’s administration in August of 2020, allegedly for family reasons. Michael Pence was never a Trump supporter, he and his wife were always Deep State players, and on January 6th, 2021, Pence knifed Trump in the back and the Republic in the heart.

The three Supreme Court Justices placed on the court by President Trump were actually chosen by Mike Pence and Kellyanne Conway.

Brett Kavanaugh replaced Justice Anthony Kennedy on the court. Kennedy was often thought of as the “swing” vote. All three of Trump’s appointees have been “swing” voters, as we just saw with Justice Kavanaugh siding with the left against medical freedom and for Biden’s unconstitutional healthcare medical mandate.





“Will It Go Round In Circles”

That’s the title of a song from the 70s by Billy Preston. As a DJ, I played it but really didn’t understand it.

I’m pretty sure I get it now.

Have you stopped to try to objectively analyze what our nation has been through since early 2020? No, we’ve had no wars, no armed international conflicts, no drought, no armed invasions: other than those which are manmade and thrust upon the nation for political purposes.

Sure, we’ve had some horrific storms: hurricanes, volcanoes, mudslides, and fires. Each was horrible and unthinkable. Those come from “Nature,” and were not man’s creations — despite what Al Gore says.

Before you question me about the obvious, COVID-19, consider this: COVID-19 was and is a disaster. But in large part, COVID-19’s pandemic was NOT natural: it was manipulated into existence and perpetrated by men — and primarily for political purposes.

No doubt, hundreds of thousands of Americans have died from infection by COVID-19. Now, in retrospect, we daily hear the questions rising in number and volume: “Have we acted in our response to COVID-19 with wisdom garnered from facts?”

Even finding an answer to that is more than speculation becomes more and more impossible every day. Facts that we witness firsthand do not seem to align with the narrative of the medical “experts” who pontificate about their knowledge and Godly intentions while ushering more and more of us into hospital intensive care units and funeral homes.

What’s REALLY going on?

To begin this week, let’s listen to one of, if not the first totally objective analyses, void of political narrative, of what has really happened during the “Era of COVID-19.” Victor Davis Hanson is my favorite — and most objective — go-to source for impartial, intellectual facts about many of the issues Americans are facing today:


“From the moment COVID-19 appeared, the pandemic became inseparable from political frenzy was inevitable since the SARS-CoV-2 virus may have escaped from a level-4 security virology lab in Wuhan, China.

The rapid-fire spread soon threatened to indict the Chinese communist government for nearly destroying the world economy and killing millions.

Western elites, in response, feared that their own lucrative investments in China would be jeopardized by such disclosures—and so acted accordingly in defending Beijing.

Nonetheless, one scenario that remains intriguing is that the escaped virus was birthed by gain-of-function research scientists, overseen by elements of the Chinese communist military. Worse, the lab was given subsidies by U.S. health authorities, routed through third parties. Hiding all of that damaging information warped government policy and media coverage.

Belatedly, a panicked China shut down all domestic travel in and out of Wuhan—but not flights abroad to Western Europe and the United States.

The rest is history.

From the outset, the World Health Organization simply spread false talking points about the outbreak from the Chinese government, delaying a robust global response.

Former President Donald Trump’s political opponents initially told Americans to shop and travel as usual—only to pivot as cases mounted and they blamed the president.

The U.S. 2020 ban on travel from China was met with charges of racism and xenophobia from presidential candidates. Ironically, many were simply channeling racist and xenophobic China’s propaganda.

Many doctors kept hammering the need for therapeutics, including taboo off-label use of cheap generic drugs. The use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin was widely ridiculed, despite continuing studies from abroad attesting to their usefulness.

Trump’s Operation Warp Speed project to develop vaccinations was also pilloried. Candidates Kamala Harris and Joe Biden did their best to talk down the safety of the impending inoculations. But once in power, they projected their own prior harmful rhetoric onto so-called “anti-vaxxers.”

Then they claimed credit for the initial success of the Trump vaccinations.

The Pfizer corporation had promised a major pre-election announcement about its likely rollout of a vaccine in October, just days before the 2020 election.

Then, mysteriously, Pfizer claimed the vaccine, in fact, would not be ready before November 3. A few days after the election of Joe Biden, the company reversed course and announced the vaccinations would soon be available.

Then-New York Governor Andrew Cuomo obstructed most all federal help with Trump’s fingerprints on it. That way Cuomo became a media, Emmy-winning darling—before resigning in disgrace.

Cuomo’s policies of steering infected patients into long-term-care facilities doomed over 10,000 of the elderly. New York is now illegally using race to grant preferences in the allotments of tests and new drugs.

The rhetoric of the media-progressive nexus that mandatory, massive lockdowns were necessary all but destroyed a booming Trump economy and denied critical medical care to millions. Emphasizing therapeutics, natural herd immunity, and the resilience of the youth to the disease were all pronounced “anti-science” by the demagogues on the Left.

Various celebrities and politicos—such as California Governor Gavin Newsom and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton—boasted the pandemic lockdown offered the perfect crisis that must not go to waste politically. Actress Jane Fonda even crowed that COVID-19 was a “gift from God to the Left” in helping to end Donald Trump.

In the waning days of the 2020 campaign, Biden went so far as to blame Trump personally for all the deaths from the virus.

Once the vaccinations had seemed to work in early 2021, an upbeat Joe Biden boasted that he would end the virus by summer 2021, by following “the science.” He went so far as to claim that no one had been vaccinated prior to his inauguration even though 17 million, including Biden himself, had been.

Then Nemesis answered such hubris.

The unforeseen delta and omicron variants hit. A new phrase, “breakthrough case,” revealed that the vaccinations often could only prevent serious illness, but not infection or infectiousness.

Suddenly the best and brightest people with three shots, who had blasted the red-state rubes as the ignorant un-vaxxed—got sick. More have now died from the virus on Biden’s than on Trump’s watch.

A warped economy amid renewed COVID-19 outbreaks helped to further destroy Biden’s waning popularity.

In reaction, the Left now calls for realism, emphasis on treatments, and acknowledgment of the value of natural immunities. It is even newly curious about the origins of the virus, and the need to ‘get back to normal.’

We are suddenly told that thousands had died “with” rather than “because” of COVID—the exact opposite of what we heard in the Trump era.

A skeptic might suggest terror over the impending midterms finally made the Left face reality.

Politicizing the pandemic is a euphemism. In truth, thousands of Americans have died needlessly because of weaponized disinformation about China’s culpability, vaccines, useful drugs, lockdowns, racial preferences, and long-care facilities.”


Victor hit the nail on the head!

I’m tired of second-guessing myself, let alone the “experts” who stand before us daily to remind us how stupid we are while “telling” — not “showing” — us how enlightened and educated on all things COVID they are. All this continues to happen while Americans are dying: from COVID-19 but also because of adverse reactions to these life-saving vaccines!

I’m looking for the answer. And the answer SHOULD come from the Oval Office.

No, it’s not realistic to expect this or any president to have all the answers. But the defining attribute of good leadership at any level is for the “expert” to recognize they do not have all the answers: the answers that are desperately needed for whatever dilemma is being faced. A good leader finds the REAL experts on each dilemma, brings them into the conversation, listens to their solutions, and then implements those solutions.

I haven’t seen that process play out in even one area of our lives in the last year.

But we did see that lived daily during the previous four years.

Say what you will, Donald Trump brought business ethics and operations to the Oval Office. He certainly wasn’t a “good” politician based on the age-old definition of that word. But he got things done.

That’s not happening under this president.

Meanwhile, Americans are dying, and dying needlessly.


Victor Davis Hanson is a conservative commentator, classicist, and military historian. He is a professor of classics emeritus at California State University, a senior fellow in classics and military history at Stanford University, a fellow of Hillsdale College, and a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness. Hanson has written 16 books, including “The Western Way of War,” “Fields Without Dreams,” and “The Case for Trump.”

Vaccination Resistance In The United Kingdom: “A Stand In The Park”

“For freedom, Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.” – Galatians 5:1

It was a typical icy cold and damp early January morning as I walked through the frozen mud to the bandstand at the center of my local park.

On this occasion, I was not going to listen to the usual brass band which would sometimes leisurely play there, but I was there to meet a group of complete strangers who have been meeting each Sunday morning in parks across the UK and around the world, to stand up peaceably for freedom, jobs, small businesses, against lockdowns, harmful laws and against people behind “The Great Reset.”

Home – A Stand in The Park

As I secretly prayed, I would not slip over as I observed them all watching me make my way over to them in extremely unsuitable footwear, my nerves slowly subsided as I walked up the steps and was met with a friendly and maskless welcome and even a hug from a group of men and women who were all extremely different in terms of their age and profession yet united in their concerns at the tyranny which is currently taking place in our world.

As we huddled under the canopy exchanging thoughts and ideas, I spoke to a beautiful young woman who was about to lose her job in the NHS (National Health Service) because she did not want to take a vaccination.

Like me, she did not work in a patient-facing environment, but her mere presence on the hospital grounds where she worked rendered her a danger to others. She had been notified that she had to have the first injection by the beginning of February and then the second injection by April if she wanted to keep her job.

At the hospital where I work, which is a mental health site, health care workers, have been notified of the same. However, they have been told other non-patient-facing roles would be sought for them, and if not suitable, dismissal is their option.   I cannot imagine how they must feel after having studied and committed themselves to a profession that is often a ‘calling’ for them to help and heal others.

Over the last two years, I have observed some of those staff leave their families and turn up each day to care for the sick. There is obviously good and bad staff, but it is certain, it is not an easy job.   Our government who originally promoted the celebration of their dedication and loyalty, by encouraging its citizens to stand on the streets and applaud them has now betrayed and rejected them.

Instead of “saving the NHS,” the organization as reported by the Department of Health and Social Care is set to lose around 126,000 medical staff in April this year. This, together with the absences which are recorded due to isolating as an outcome of a positive test or a family member having a positive result, means that the service is collapsing. This will affect all citizens who access the health service for other minor and very serious issues.  They will be at risk.

NHS100k is an initiative set up in November 2021 by a group of frontline ambulance staff who respect freedom of choice and wish to connect 100,000 health and social care staff who will lose their jobs by April 2022.

Reference from NHS100k is also made to Dr. Sam White who was a GP suspended by the NHS for speaking out about informed consent, the safety of the vaccine, and other safe and effective treatments. Dr. White has recently succeeded in winning a high court battle for freedom of speech after he was ordered not to make comments about anything to do with COVID!

It is reported:

Dr. White is finally free to share the peer reviewed literature he has been saving since his social media ban and his focus will be on protecting children from the experimental mRNA vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna, as they can cause myocarditis.

As we made our way from the bandstand to a local coffee shop I listened to the many divisions and arguments which had been created and experienced within the workplace and the home. The group was extremely aware and well informed of the not-so-subtle brain-washing and relentless propaganda which had taken place in order to create such division. We spoke about The Nuremberg Code, and the cruelty towards patients who had died without their families last Christmas whilst politicians at No 10 Downing Street had reportedly held celebrations.

As we entered the lovely warm coffee shop away from the icy cold bandstand, I then found myself sitting with the young NHS worker who was about to lose her job.  We were joined by her husband and two young children. I asked them if they had a Plan B. Her husband said they would take one day at a time. He was re-assuring. Despite the dilemma, I did think how fortunate they were as a family to be on the same page in relation to their views on the situation.

Their little boy who was about five years old started studying my face and asking me questions and telling me all about himself. He compared our hair color, his being natural and mine not. He compared the color of our eyes, staring deeply into mine, informed me of the number of freckles he had, told me about a scar he possessed, and various other statements in a wonderfully free manner. Their family dog sat under the table looking from one to the other, possibly wondering when the food would be arriving.

Sitting within the warmth of that family I remembered how life should always be for us all. They made me welcome and it was wonderful to be with them. A mixture of generations with a deep desire and a love for freedom, free to speak, to look at each other, and make factual observations without any fear.

For the sake of the next generation, I believe that whatever our differences we must make a stand in our own way and draw a line in the sand against the impossible restrictions and the mandates which are being forced upon us.

A Stand in the Park which was founded in Sydney Australia by Brady Gunn, who invited people to stand for truth with him, stood alone at first but after three months people joined him.

A Stand in the Park now has 100,000 members who meet in over 1000 parks in 20 countries.

©Shirley Edwards. All rights reserved.

Saturday Bullet Points: January 15, 2022

Today, the “Ides of January,” is probably not a good day for President Biden. His week was dismal in every way! He got “busted” on every front possible. He heard his Build Back Better bill is toast; his quest to kill the filibuster to allow Democrats flying solo to pass the Voting overhaul legislation failed; The Supreme Court killed his COVID-19 mandate that was to force companies with 100 or more employees to require employees to get vaxxed.

We’ll leave the President with his bad news and hope he recuperates well in Delaware this weekend. But there are many more important news stories from the week. Why don’t we take a look at those while you sip your second and third cup of Saturday morning Java!

Bullet Points

  • While the corporate COVID-19 vaccination was nixed by the Supreme Court, many Americans were shocked SCOTUS let the other mandate stand. That applied to healthcare workers whose employers receive federal funding through Medicare and Medicaid. The first mandate was ruled unconstitutional by a 6-3 margin by the Court. But two of the conservative justices jumped ship on the healthcare worker mandate which allowed it to stand. And Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida brutalized those two justices for their switch. Who are they? For complete details, click on this link:
  • In 2021, the Federal Government spent a fortune in relief for American individuals, families, and businesses in the name of COVID Relief. Part of that monstrous financial package was assistance for parents with young children. The objective was to help parents pay the elevated costs for childcare to allow Mom and Dad to stay on the job. But a big change is coming. It will impact all of these families, and it’s happening this weekend. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Federal investigators arrested Oath Keepers commander Stewart Rhodes in Texas on Thursday morning, more than a year after the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol. In connection with last year’s Capitol siege, nine more people have been charged with multiple counts. For complete details, click on this link:

  • California has proudly become the epicenter of many of the attacks on our freedoms — freedoms like free speech and the right to peacefully assemble. And they’ve passed laws to restrict some of these, namely the rights of Californians to peacefully demonstrate at abortion clinics and at centers that provide vaccinations for COVID-19. But, surprisingly, a federal court this week popped Florida for taking those actions and confirmed those rights for those people, and the rest of us. For complete details, click on this link:
  • People are dying everyday in the U.S. Young people are dying everyday in the U.S. Though sad, neither of these is unusual. But what IS unusual is that an alarming increase of deaths among Americans 18-49 years of age is being analyzed for cause. Don’t be quick to bring COVID-19 into this conversations. COVID-19 is NOT the cause for these deaths. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Another member of the House has announced they are not running for re-election. This one’s a Republican. He’s one of the ten GOP House members who voted to impeach former President Trump. One by one they’re falling away! For complete details, click on this link:
  • Joe Biden knows as much about the workings of the three branches of government as anyone. He knows the buck always stops at the U.S. Supreme Court. When the Justices weigh in on issues, the issues are resolved. But, maybe not in the case of Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate that the Supreme Court struck down. He’s now urging large employers to ignore the Court and just go ahead with their vaccine mandates. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Have you noticed the shelves empty in any grocery store in which you shop? Most Americans have seen this, but, thankfully, it’s been sparingly. But, guess what: if you think the supply chain problems have been bad, it’s only just begun. The “mother of all supply chain shortages” is about to be foisted on the U.S. What’s happening to cause this? For complete details, click on this link:
  • It is indisputable that the President’s son has for a long time been involved in shady financial dealings internationally that have far reaching consequences. Many feel those consequences reach as far as the White House, but the Department of Justice is too busy to investigate. Guess who’s son is now in the bullseye of investigators? The son of another Democrat heavyweight, Nancy Pelosi! Paul, Jr. is in deep trouble regarding shady dealings of his own. And, yes, it appears Queen Nancy “may” have something to do with it. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Here I go again; I’m probably going to get in trouble for saying this: It appears that the 2020 election really DID contain some wrongdoing. A Wisconsin judge considered the mail drop-box process in the state and concluded that the process that was being used violates the law. Don’t get mad at me: a judge said that. For complete details, click on this link:
  • The Biden Administration apparently has decided the Chinese are simply “truth-sayers” regarding the source of the COVID-19 virus. They told Uncle Joe that they had nothing to do with its origination or spreading. They too, they tell us, have had many of their citizens become COVID-casualties. Part of that is true: they have had many deaths. But the death numbers they have shared with the world are a little different than the real number of Chinese COVID-19 deaths. How off is their number? The real number is as much as 366 times the reported number. For complete details, click on this link:

How Evil Was Comey’s FBI And Its Cost To The Nation?

Who will ever forget the day the White House announced the firing of FBI Director James Comey. Half the nation wailed in discussed at President Trump’s actions. The other half were either indifferent or really glad Trump pulled the trigger. Why?

Comey just seemed sleezy. Remember his manipulation of the voter support of Hillary Clinton by Comey’s waffling on the FBI’s investigation of her and her illegal computer server? Comey seemed to be playing the political game. We discovered later that indeed what he was up to.

After his termination, Comey was found to have violated classified document dissemination: which is a felony. Whatever happened to Comey for that? In addition, he lied under oath before Congress. Yet Comey has yet not been held accountable for his lawbreaking.

But the FBI shadiness was not over. Andrew McCabe, then the deputy director of the FBI, stepped up temporarily fill the Director’s spot. His “success” in that position was short lived. He too went by the wayside. Why? When the disgraced FISA warrant application that resulted in the Russia Collusion travesty in which the DOJ had illegally surveilled members of Trump’s campaign, McCabe’s fingerprints were all over the faked FISA warrant application.

That was the beginning of the end of the blind trust by Americans for decades of the FBI. Since that time, more details appear that cast more doubt than trust in the FBI was deserved — at least during the Obama Administration. Neither man has faced prosecution for their very obvious illegal activities. Comey, in fact, penned a “tell-all” and made millions spinning his yarn about all-things Trump. But what about Andrew McCabe?

Ex-FBI Deputy Director Looking For a “Gig”

Have you ever wondered what disgraced former deputy FBI directors do after trying to stage a coup and lying under oath? Apparently, they give talks about “protecting democracy” at top-rated institutions of higher learning.  The University of Chicago invited former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe to join a panel of partisans to discuss the Jan 6 “insurrection.”

McCabe was fired as the deputy FBI director for leaking sensitive information about an investigation into the Clinton Foundation and then lying about it under oath. He also took part in spying on the Donald Trump campaign through a secret warrant granted by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court.

The dossier he used to obtain the surveillance warrant was funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign and, in an ironic twist, was itself the product of Russian disinformation. McCabe and his allies in corporate media justified all sorts of similar illegal and undemocratic tactics to discredit and attempt to unseat President Trump.

Of course, neither the University of Chicago nor McCabe acknowledged the irony in him discussing the integrity of “democracy” in America on Thursday evening. In fact, what McCabe said at the University of Chicago event on Jan. 6, 2022, is even more shocking than his invitation to speak in the first place. Below are four of the most appalling assertions and policy proposals McCabe made at the public event.

1. Conservatives Are in The Same Category As Islamic Terrorists 

McCabe likened conservatives to members of the Islamic Caliphate: “I can tell you from my perspective of spending a lot of time focused on the radicalization of international terrorists and Islamic extremist and extremists of all stripes… is that this group shares many of the same characteristics of those groups that we’ve seen radicalized along entirely different ideological lines,” he said.

McCabe went on to describe the rise of the Islamic caliphate in Syria and how Islamic extremists were radicalized across socioeconomic, educational, and racial lines, likening it to the “mass radicalization” of the political right across demographics. That’s right, according to McCabe a grandma who shares a Federalist article on Facebook and your uncle with a “Let’s Go Brandon” coffee mug is in the same category as a jihadist who killed 49 people at an Orlando nightclub.

2. Parents at School Board Meetings Pose A”Threat To National Security”

“Political violence [is] not just confined to the Capitol,” McCabe asserted. “It’s going on in school boards around the country. It’s going on in local elections. It’s happening, you know, even to health-care workers.” According to this politically protected former FBI no. 2, the “political violence” occurring recently at school board meetings and during local elections is a “very diverse and challenging threat picture.”

If you haven’t heard already, Democrats are branding parents who oppose child mask mandates and racist critical race theory indoctrination as “domestic terrorists.”

McCabe said moms and dads who stand up for their children’s health and education at school board meetings in ways Democrats disagree with are very dangerous. So dangerous that it is actually “essential” we have a “rapid and complete response by law enforcement at the state, local and federal level to this sort of political violence…”

Holding America’s parents “accountable” is not enough for McCabe. He wants to make sure that federal agencies also put “out that message that this sort of conduct that both horribly victimizes individuals, but also serves to undermine our democratic process” is “considered a threat to national security [that is] not tolerated.”

3. McCabe Wants More Surveillance of “Mainstream” Conservatives 

“I’m fairly confident,” McCabe said, “[that] the FBI [and other agencies] have reallocated resources and repositioned some of their counterterrorism focus to increase their focus on right-wing extremism and domestic violent extremists. And I think that’s obviously a good idea.”

But McCabe wants more. McCabe asserted that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and FBI need to stop merely focusing on the “fringes of the right-wing movement,” in order to “catch this threat” of the “right.”

“Are you going to catch this threat if your focus is only on the traditional, right-wing extremist, those groups that we know about, the quote-unquote, fringes of the right-wing movement?” asked McCabe. “And I think the answer to that is no.”

“It’s entirely possible that when the intelligence community and the law enforcement community looks out across this mainstream,” McCabe continued, “they didn’t assume [on January 6] that that group of people — business owners, white people from the suburbs, educated, employed — presented a threat of violence, and now we know very clearly that they do.”

McCabe wants to get around constitutional obstacles that restrict the abuses of federal agencies. He explained that the path to granting the feds more power to spy on and punish “extremists,” a.k.a. conservatives, is by implementing federal penalties against “domestic terrorism.”

A measure like this would grant domestic agencies the intelligence capabilities of the international terrorism-focused National Counterterrorism Center. It would, McCabe says, “give investigators the ability to begin investigating when folks are plotting or planning or organizing to use violence for the purpose of coercing the population or influencing government…”

Joshua Geltzer, President Joe Biden’s advisor on “countering domestic violent extremism,” made the same proposal in a 2019 hearing before a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee. In his proposal, Geltzer suggested that we need to “polic[e] [tech company] platforms to remove not just incitement to violence, but also, the ideological foundations that spawn such violence.”

McCabe claims these proposed federal laws against domestic terrorism can be implemented without infringing on Americans’ First Amendment right to free speech. That seems quite impossible, however, given Geltzer is proposing government oversight of social media, for example.

It is even more difficult to believe when you consider that Democrats are not going after real domestic terrorists and have literally defined parents speaking out at school board meetings as national security threats. As McCabe said himself, to Democrats, the extreme right is the mainstream right.

4. McCabe Believes No One Is Above The Law (Except Himself)

Ironically, one of McCabe’s last remarks was a proclamation of equality under the law. “Whether you are a Trump supporter or a Biden supporter, right, left, or otherwise, we should all be able to agree on the principle that no one is above the law,” stated McCabe.

“… [F]rom the lowliest trespasser on January 6, up to the highest-ranking government officials who may have been aware of a plan that would ultimately lead to violence in the Capitol––those people should be held accountable, period,” he announced. “And if we can’t do that, that is just another sign that we are becoming a non-functioning democracy.”

Ironically, McCabe’s firing for repeatedly breaking the law was expunged from the record only because he settled with a partisan Biden Department of Justice. If no one is above the law, as McCabe claims to support, then he would be in jail. Of course, McCabe is above the law. Only dissenting conservatives, in his view, deserve the suspicion and wrath of unelected federal agencies.

Disturbingly, the University of Chicago does not care about national introspection post-January 6, 2021. If it did, it would not have invited McCabe, of all people, to speak about “protecting democracy.”

UChicago allowed McCabe to spin lies about what truly happened one year ago and filtered student questions via Zoom, refusing to ask him any tough questions. Consequently, McCabe was given a platform to teach young, impressionable college students without question that the federal government should be weaponized against fellow Americans whom leftists brand as “extremists.”


To the elites in America — Democrats like McCabe, university administrators, and professors – January 6 is the key to labeling their political opponents as dangerous, “white supremacist extremists” and enacting new policy accordingly.

America’s universities are now indoctrination machines that shape the minds of the next generation. Academia openly exploits its power and rewrite history to serve their illiberal agenda.

Sadly, McCabe’s dishonest version of January 6 is happily accepted by the academic elites who invited him. His frighteningly despotic views and policy prescriptions will likely be accepted and implemented by his young listeners.