The enemies of America (woke leftists) who want to see the country taken over by those who refuse to assimilate into American culture have been working overtime to come up with ways to allow people to gain the same rights as natural-born citizens by using the Constitution as their weapon. According to these individuals, you can gain citizenship by using a waterway known as a canal. No, it’s not the Panama Canal or the Suez Canal; it is the birth canal.
Birthright citizenship is quite simple. If you are born in America, you get the privilege of being an American citizen if you happen to be born on American soil. The math is very simple and can be expressed in many ways:
Noncitizen Vacationer + Noncitizen Vacationer = American Citizen
Illegal Alien + Illegal Alien = American Citizen
The law that leftists use to make this happen is the 14th Amendment. Anyone who has ever studied American history knows this amendment was 1 of 3 Amendments created during Reconstruction to deal with the issue of slavery and the rights of freed men. It was never intended to be used as a tool to allow people from other nations to just show up and receive citizenship for their newborns because it was not an issue during this time period. Today, it has become big business for nations that not only send us their tired and poor (and criminals), but also send us their pregnant women (What is a woman?). Perhaps they should create a new Statue of Liberty and make it look as if it is with child if this law is to be maintained.
In today’s America, there are over 340 million people living within America’s now secure borders. The Biden Administration, realizing that the only way for democrats to stay in power was to open the border and bribe potential future democratic voters to settle in America. This created a crime crisis, a voting crisis, and an immigration crisis. Areas of the country became overrun, and foreign-born individuals became power brokers in federal, state, and local governments as a result of policies by Obama and Biden to flood the nation with people from other countries. The combination of open borders and birthright citizenship has the potential to completely change the American landscape (one short-term and the other long-term) into something the founders never envisioned nor would have supported.
The 14th Amendment has 5 sections, and here they are verbatim:
AMENDMENT XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
It is this amendment and its ramifications that are the subject of a debate currently being argued before the Supreme Court in Trump v. Barbara, which stems from an executive order by Donald Trump to prevent birthright citizenship. The American Civil Liberties Union, an organization many believe works against Americans, argues that the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment means that nearly everyone born in the U.S. is automatically granted citizenship.
The case for the Trump Administration is being argued by Solicitor General D. John Sauer, who contends that the amendment has been misused and cites 19th-century wording indicating the overreach of those who believe that simply being born is sufficient to make someone a citizen. He cited a 1898 case in which it was demonstrated that lawful permanent residence was a prerequisite to American citizenship.
One of the exchanges was between Sauer and Chief Justice Roberts. Sauer stated, “We’re in a new world now … where 8 billion people are one plane ride away from having a child who is a U.S. citizen.” “Well, it’s a new world. It’s the same Constitution,” Roberts replied. This may be true and a great sound bite; however, is Roberts denying that the Constitution, a document that was written long before airplanes, automatic weapons, and the internet were conceived of should be rigidly interpreted to ignore the fact that it is a “new world” and requires an examination of old words that impact the modern world? If that is so, then how can the court make any rules on anything that didn’t exist at the time when it was written? It appears more likely to be an excuse to avoid making a ruling that would disallow birthright citizenship and make a responsible decision for America’s future.
It appears the court will most likely opt to do what they do best in terms of controversial decisions. They will most likely rely on Section 5 and argue that the executive branch lacked jurisdiction to rule on birthright citizenship, since it clearly states that Congress retains this power. Should this happen, don’t expect Congress to do anything about it, as more citizens will enter the country through the sea of amniotic fluid.
