The United States has committed numerous Acts of War against Russia this year (2022). This is not a value judgment. I make no claim here about whether the United States has acted wisely, or has acted with justification. I simply note it. James A. Nollet
Ukraine had quite serious impact on the many Russians. They could see that ordinary people in Ukraine which is a bordering state, very close to Russia, the people of this state are, they didn’t want to tolerate anymore the power abuse by Ukrainian officials. Garry Kasparov
We have said that this is actually a conflict between Russia and the collective West. And the main country of the collective West is the United States of America. Dmitry Peskov of the Kremlin.
President Trump recently stated that the United States had given Ukraine $350 billion. The actual funds given were $181 billion, but with military equipment, the total may reach $350 billion.
The U.S. Constitution does not permit aid to foreign countries, but through political maneuvering, the House and Senate have allocated taxpayer dollars worldwide. Due to varying historical record-keeping and definitions of “foreign aid,” it is challenging to determine the total amount of American tax dollars spent on foreign countries since the country’s inception.
By the end of World War II, the U.S. had provided over $3.8 trillion in foreign aid, adjusted for inflation. The average annual spending between 1946 and 2023 was $51.4 billion. U.S. international transactions in 2024 increased U.S. liabilities to foreign residents by $2.05 trillion, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).
So, how does the government justify spending our tax dollars on other countries? In Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States.” This “Spending Clause” has been interpreted to permit foreign aid, as it falls under the broad definition of “general welfare.” The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, for example, is a law passed by Congress that authorizes the President to provide assistance to foreign countries.
General welfare is for the United States, as the Constitution states, not foreign governments. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 was passed and signed into law in September 1961 by President John F. Kennedy. It replaced President Truman’s 1951 Mutual Security Act. In my book, it is unconstitutional and should be overturned by the Supreme Court. However, we’ve seen enough high court decisions to know for sure that not all of the Supreme Court justices know the U.S. Constitution. If they did, you wouldn’t have a 6-3 decision regarding whether or not the Executive Branch has the right to fire people from the Department of Education.
While the Constitution doesn’t explicitly forbid foreign aid, it does establish checks and balances on the power to spend money. Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, known as the Spending Clause, grants Congress the power to tax and spend, but it also states that money can only be drawn from the Treasury “in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law”. This means that any spending, including foreign aid, must be authorized by a law passed by Congress. The House and Senate have authorized giving away billions to foreign countries.
Congress must stop the latest handout of military arms to Ukraine, even though NATO is allegedly paying for it. As a member of NATO, we are giving away stored military hardware to a foreign country that we may need in the future. And no one has ever answered the question of why we belong to NATO in the first place.
“President Joe Biden stated that investing in Ukraine’s freedom is a small price to pay to punish Russian aggression. J.D. Vance suggested that providing Americans with economic upside in Ukraine’s future is the best security guarantee. According to the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition, it is in the national interest to give Ukraine the tools to defeat Vladimir Putin. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Michael McCaul remarked that Ukraine’s success in repelling the invasion will set the stage for this century and that funding is an investment in the future.”
War hawks…and money.
Volodymyr Zelensky
Volodymyr Zelensky was an actor and comedian prior to his election. Clips of his “performances” are found on the internet, most of which are not fit for discussion. In April of 2019, he was elected President of Ukraine.
President Zelensky appeared as a hologram at the Founders Forum, a globalist event in London, on June 15, 2022. It was a gathering of tech entrepreneurs in the U.K., to call on Europe’s tech leaders to help rebuild Ukraine and to announce a “digital lend-lease.”
Zelensky promoted a future where Ukraine adopts a “digital government where all services to people and companies will be provided” and a “100% cashless and paperless” society will emerge.
He also advocated for the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial system.
“Our goal is to make Ukraine the freest digital state in the world,” Zelensky stated.
“Ukraine is a chance for a global digital revolution, a chance for every technology company, and a chance for every visionary to show their value, skills, technologies, and ambitions.”
Ukraine will not be among the world’s freest states if Zelensky can implement the dystopian wishes of his technocrat masters at the World Economic Forum, in Davos, and elsewhere.
Ukrainian elections were cancelled by Zelensky, who declared martial law in February 2022 due to the war.
The Peace Deal
A peace deal was signed in 2022 between Russia and Ukraine. And Zelensky had agreed not to join NATO.
President Biden’s former U.S. Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Victoria Nuland, confirmed that the West advised Ukraine to reject the 2022 peace deal with Russia. The peace process had collapsed after Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s intervention. Nuland stated that the peace deal included limits on Ukraine’s weapons, neutering its military. However, the agreement put no restraints on Russia’s military capabilities. Questions from Ukrainian and international officials led to the deal’s failure.
The West advised Ukraine to continue fighting instead of accepting the deal.
Nuland had previously acknowledged that both Moscow and Kyiv initially sought a diplomatic solution in early 2022. Putin claimed the U.S. and European elites wanted to strategically defeat Russia and squash the peace process. The draft agreement in Istanbul between Russia and Ukraine was formulated during March and April 2022, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and would have ended hostilities. Ukraine was prepared to limit its military and declare neutrality, while Moscow was willing to offer security guarantees to Ukraine. Boris Johnson allegedly delivered the message to Zelensky to reject the agreement.
Nuland’s involvement in Ukrainian affairs stretches back to the 2014 Western-backed coup in Kyiv. Nuland served as the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs at the United States Department of State under Obama, where she was a major organizer and planner in the 2013-2014 “orange revolution” overthrow and replacement of Ukraine’s democratically elected government with a coalition of politicians covertly supported by CIA-funded foundations.
Nuland resigned in March 2024 after acknowledging U.S. policy failures.
Putin is allegedly still open to peace talks based on the Istanbul agreement, but not with some of the latest demands.
NATO and Bioweapon Labs
Russian officials have long claimed that during negotiations about German reunification, Western leaders gave verbal assurances that NATO would not expand eastward. Any expansion by NATO, particularly after the collapse of the Soviet Union, has been seen as a violation of the promises and a threat to Russia’s security.
President Putin has repeatedly stated that NATO expansion is a major factor in Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine because of the broken promises.
The United Nations, National Public Radio, and the British Broadcasting Corporation claim there is no proof that Ukraine is developing bioweapons in labs funded by the US government and its military on the borders of Russia. Do we know for certain that this was Russian disinformation? Of course not, but it is what Russia has suggested.
Victoria Nuland earlier confirmed the presence of biological research facilities on the territory of Ukraine. The United States aims to prevent them from falling under Russian control.
One America News reported the following:
Hunter Biden’s company, Rosemont Seneca, invested $500,000 in the San Francisco startup Metabiota, which has been linked to biological research and related activities in Ukraine. Multiple sources indicate that Metabiota, along with other U.S. private companies, was contracted by the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD) Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) to conduct and finance biological research in Ukraine.
Hunter secured millions through various firms, including Goldman Sachs. Metabiota compiles data from around the world to predict disease outbreaks. The company is a partner with USAID‘s PREDICT and PREVENT programs.
Metabiota is a subcontractor for the Defense Department’s engineering firm, Black and Veatch. Reports, legal proceedings, and articles related to Black & Veatch highlight several areas where the company’s conduct has drawn scrutiny or led to legal disputes. The U.S. DOD issued a contract for COVID-19 Research in Ukraine three months before COVID-19 officially existed. Government funding records showed that the DOD awarded $370,000 to biolabs in Ukraine for COVID-19 research in November 2019. This was three months before the WHO even named the Chinese virus.
The U.S. and Hunter Biden were officially helping to fund research into Coronavirus before it officially existed at the same labs that the State Department also insisted didn’t exist. And which biolab received this generous donation to conduct research on the Chinese virus? Black and Veatch Special Projects Corp, the same lab that Hunter Biden was helping to fund. And while Hunter was on the board of the Ukrainian gas company, Burisma, he helped arrange introductions to officials at the biolabs operated by Metabiota.
We have the disgraced son of the Vice-President hired to do favors for a corrupt Ukrainian gas company, who is also connecting that company with a bioweapons research firm doing research on the Coronavirus before it was even released.
One has to wonder if Joe Biden is personally responsible for contributing to the creation of COVID-19. Moscow was saying all of this from the beginning. Moscow warned the world that secret American warfare labs were operating in Ukraine, developing bioweapons for military purposes. We dismissed it as Russian propaganda.
It actually looks like another reason for the invasion of Ukraine was to prevent them from using these bioweapons against Russia and the rest of the world. Did Russia have a moral obligation to fight back against the bioterrorism America is apparently conducting in Ukraine? Is it a coincidence that one of the biggest bioweapons labs in the world is located in Mariupol, Ukraine, which Russia fought to liberate from the Ukrainian Nazis?
Russia is not the aggressor here. In reality, it’s the United States and the Pentagon, along with their allies in Europe and NATO, who are responsible for triggering and instigating this conflict.
The critics and warmongers call this Russian propaganda, but these are the facts from evidence.
The World Health Organization (WHO) advised Ukraine to destroy high-threat pathogens housed in these facilities to prevent potential spills and the spread of disease, especially given the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. “This recommendation is for safety reasons and doesn’t imply involvement in bioweapons development.”
Azov Battalion
In February 2024, Fox News’ host Bret Baier traveled to Ukraine to interview President Volodymyr Zelenskyy about the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine. It was the first interview Zelenskyy had done on the front lines of the war. In that interview, Zelensky stated that he had integrated the Azov Battalion into the Ukrainian Army, but Fox News edited it out of the interview.
The infantry military unit was initially formed as a volunteer group in May 2014 out of the ultra-nationalist Patriot of Ukraine gang and the neo-Nazi Social National Assembly (SNA) group. Both groups engaged in xenophobic and neo-Nazi ideals and physically assaulted migrants, the Roma community, and people opposing their views.
The unit has drawn controversy over its early and continuing association with neo-Nazi ideology, its use of controversial symbols linked to Nazism, especially the swastika and the Waffen SS, and early allegations that members of the unit participated in human rights violations. Photos of Nazi symbols are found on Ukrainian helmets.
In this video, Ex-UK PM Boris Johnson calls Ukrainian neo-Nazis “heroes,” and urges his fellow private club members to give yet more weapons to Ukraine.
The Russian Website RT states, “Ukraine is the only country in the world that has integrated openly neo-Nazi militias into its national military, and while Western media once described these militias as ‘neo-Nazi,’ they are now referred to as ‘far-right groups.” Since Russian troops entered Ukraine in February, stashes of Nazi paraphernalia have been found in the houses and bases of these militia members, and social media accounts run by the Ukrainian government have posted similar images of soldiers wearing Nazi and far-right symbols.”
Conclusion
Negotiations to end the war have stalled. President Trump and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte announced they would give Ukraine new American weapons bought by European allies. And President Trump threatened massive new sanctions on Russia if there is no cease-fire established by early September.
One of President Trump’s closest and wisest advisors told him long ago that he and President Putin could and should become friends and allies. Both love their countries and their people.
He said, “Trump and Putin could have created a friendship of mutual respect and built a relationship that would have benefited both their countries had the Democrats not destroyed that possibility back in 2017. Instead, the Democrats threw both of them under the bus, and Putin is now closer to China and Iran when a friendship with America could have been forged long ago to both countries’ benefit.”
