It has been exhausting since late January of 2020 to investigate, explore, dig for facts both good and bad, about everything that’s part of the COVID-19 story. Honestly, in normal circumstances in which good or bad things happen at the national and/or international levels, news media operations have good access to information. It has seemed from the beginning of COVID-19 and our subsequent pandemic, facts, evidence, details, and pros and cons of everything to do with it all have been cloaked in a mysterious “off-limits room” available only to a select few. Subsequently, TruthNewsNetwork — from the onset — has been skeptical about what we have all been spoon-fed as “facts,” provided to us by the “Experts.” And, sure enough, constant changes in the facts, arguments about every part of all this happen daily between medical professionals from around the globe, and citizens of the planet have been kept in darkness. We don’t know what we should believe and we don’t know who to believe.
In the U.S., our so-called “go-to” expert was (and still is) Dr. Anthony Fauci.
We will not launch into the multiple 180-degree changes in the absolutes Dr. Fauci gave to us from the White House briefing room. Nor will we detail the verified lies he’s been caught telling. But what we ARE going to do today and continue in the weeks and months ahead is present to you the incidents, media reports, medical professionals, and their testimonies based on medical evidence that either confirms or debunks the “facts” we’ve been given by all the experts from Dr. Fauci on down.
Let me prepare you: beginning today, you will get information on several subjects that will anger you, frighten you, yet will clear some of the questions you have had about the information we’ve been given that just didn’t seem all right. And it will be that way in these reports going forward.
Please understand that we cannot give you a timeline or projection on when, how many, nor contents that will be included in these updates to you. There’s just no way to know. But, based on the initial reports and evidence we give you today, it appears there will be many more to come. We’ll call this series “COVID-19 Evidence and Unanswered Questions.”
Part One: Suspicious Airline Pilot Deaths at British Airways
Big Tech and the corporate media are moving furiously to suppress the news that four British Airways pilots have died in recent days after reportedly getting the Covid vaccine. A June 17 tweet included a photo of the four pilots which were accompanied by condolence books. Twitter’s censors marked the tweet as being in “violation of the Twitter rules.”
The reported age of the pilots was the mid-30s to 50s. Since pilots receive regular health checks, no known disease or condition that would lead to a healthy pilot suddenly dying was reported.
In a voice recording that was posted on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, an unidentified male says he has spoken to a “friend who’s a BA pilot” and explains “things are getting crazy” after his fellow pilots passed away. All three platforms have since removed the recording, citing “false information.” The recording continued: “They’ve had the third BA pilot die in the last seven days, yeah? Third pilot dead in the last week. The first two guys were in their forties and fifties; this guy, mid-thirties, perfectly fit, no underlying conditions. He gets his second jab and he’s dead within days, exactly the same with the first two. Because of this, BA is now in crisis talks with the government about whether to allow vaccinated pilots to fly. The issue with that of course is that about 80%, according to my friend in BA, 80-85% have been injected.”
The corporate media, Big Tech, and it appears even British Airways are insisting that it is completely coincidental that four healthy pilots who reportedly received the Covid jab died within days of each other.
In a vague June 17 Twitter post, British Airways said: “Sadly four members of our pilot community passed away recently. Our thoughts are with their family and friends. However, there is no truth whatsoever in the claims on social media speculating that the four deaths are linked.”
Reuters moved swiftly in an attempt to bury the story, issuing a June 17 “fact check,” which did nothing to counter the fact that four healthy pilots died after getting the jab, but only reported the comment in the recording which said British Airlines was in “crisis talks” over the pilot deaths.
In its “fact check,” Reuters noted: “Reuters presented the claims to British Airways, which said they were unfounded and that no such talks were underway with the government. The spokesperson, however, confirmed the authenticity of the four condolence books, as four company pilots had recently passed away.”
Part Two: Moderna Is Outed For COVID-19 Vaccine Work Before January 1, 2020
A document reveals that Moderna, along with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Fauci, agreed in Dec. 2019 to transfer coronavirus RNA vaccine applicants to the University of North Carolina. Signatories to the document were Dr. Ralph Baric on Dec. 12, 2019, and Jacqueline Quay on Dec. 16, 2019, both for the University of North Carolina, Dr. Amy F. Petrik on Dec. 12, 2019, and Dr. Barney Graham for NIAID, and Sunny Himansu and Shaun Ryan, both on Dec. 17, 2019, for Moderna.
All signatures were made before there was any public knowledge of the coronavirus occurrence, as officially December 31, 2019, was when World Health Organization (WHO) learned that there were suspected cases of unknown pneumonia in Wuhan, China, and they did not know the cause. On Jan. 9, 2020, it was only that WHO released the information that China determined that the cause of this new pneumonia was a new coronavirus. So before the existence of a new coronavirus was known, Moderna, in conjunction with NIAID, led by Dr. Fauci, transferred the coronavirus RNA vaccine technology to Dr. Baric.
Let’s break down those involved:
- Moderna had the technology for a COVID-19 vaccine before the world knew of the existence of this new coronavirus.
- Dr. Fauci is accused of funding the Wuhan lab in gain-of-function research, which is where the new coronavirus likely came from and at the same time participating in this deal. Fauci must have already known about the existence of this new virus.
- Dr. Baric, who conducted gain-of-function research in his lab at the University of North Carolina and collaborated with Chinese researcher Shi Zhengli in conducting these same experiments in the Wuhan lab. Both received funding from Fauci.
Moreover, as early as 2018, Baric seemed to know that there would be the next pandemic. At a symposium with the name “Imagining the next flu pandemic, and preventing it!” held at a University of North Carolina Education Center, the epidemiologist, in a controversial presentation, talked about how “Pandemics are times of opportunity” for people to make political, financial and personal gains.
Dr. Baric was to sign a letter sent by Dr. Peter Daszak to the scientific journal The Lancet, to pressure the scientific community to rule out that the new coronavirus originated in a laboratory. He did not sign the letter at Daszak’s request. It might bring attention to the fact that he was also researching gain-of-function and that the letter might lose validity due to a conflict of interest, Trending Politics reported. It should be noted that four close associates of Baric did sign the letter.
This new document fuels the theory that the virus left the Wuhan laboratory long before the CCP made official the existence of the outbreak of the new coronavirus.
Part Three: A CCP Virus Variant Is Much More Lethal Than Thought
According to data released by Public Health England (PHE) on Friday, June 18, the fatality rate from the Delta CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Virus variant is six times greater among individuals who were fully vaccinated for two weeks or longer than those who never got a shot.
“This is reminiscent of the ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) phenomenon that has been seen for other vaccines and that has been expressed as a point of concern among many scientists for the COVID vaccines,” experienced researcher Stephanie Seneff at Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory reported. Earlier efforts with CCP Virus vaccines were hampered by ADE, which typically resulted in increased lung illness in injected lab animals. It prompted experts to advise scientists in 2012 to proceed with “caution” while developing human CCP Virus vaccines that could cause increased lung illness. “I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-Co-V2 strains,” Seneff stated.
There were 26 deaths out of 4,087 patients who were fully vaccinated 14 days or more before testing positive for the Delta CCP Virus strain. According to data released in a June 18 report titled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16,” this compared to a death rate of 0.00636 %, which was 6.6 times higher than the rate of 0.000957 %—or 34 deaths among 35,521 positive Delta cases among those who did not get a shot.
For Delta, a version that PHE identifies as the “dominant variant” in the UK, encompassing “91 percent of sequenced cases,” both mortality rates among the unvaccinated and vaccinated were extremely low (less than 1 % of all positive cases).
The Delta version of the CCP Virus pandemic was defined as more easily disseminated between people in a risk analysis issued on Friday, June 18, but it was also classified as a variety with “low infection severity.”
Completely vaccinated individuals were hospitalized at a higher rate than unvaccinated people in the UK. Two percent of vaccinated patients (84 of 4,087) who tested positive for the Delta variant were admitted to the hospital, compared to 1.48 % of unvaccinated ones (527 of 35,521), according to the most recent technical briefing report.
According to PHE’s current risk assessment for SARS-C0V-2 variations, a shocking 61 % of the cases sequenced were the Delta form (B.1.617.2). This indicated that the Delta variant, which was initially discovered in India, is more prevalent in the UK than the Alpha form, which caused a spike last year. It was classified as a variation of concern by the World Health Organization (WHO), which has given it the name Delta (VOC). It continued to see “significantly increased transmissibility” and a “growing number of countries reporting outbreaks associated with this variant,” WHO reported.
People completely vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine have more than five times lower levels of neutralizing antibodies against the Delta variant than against other versions, according to a report published in The Lancet on Friday, June 11.
Part Four: U.S. Well-Know Doctor Shares Certainty of Wuhan Lab Weaponization of COVID-19
Dr. Peter McCullough, an American professor of medicine and Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University, stated in an interview last week that the world has been exposed to a form of bioterrorism and that the repression of early Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Virus treatments “was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine.”
During a June 11 conference with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, a German trial attorney, McCullough said that he believed bioterrorism had occurred in two waves, with the first being the spread of the CCP Virus and the second being the spread of harmful vaccines, which he claimed may have already killed up to 50,000 people in the U.S. According to McCullough, both the coronavirus and the vaccines sent “the spike protein, [which is] the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research” to the human body.
“We know that this is phase two of bioterrorism, we don’t know who’s behind it, but we know that they want a needle in every arm to inject messenger RNA or adenoviral DNA into every human being,” he claimed, warning the public about the injections. “They want every human being.”
Later, McCullough expressed concern that the experimental immunizations could cause cancer and sterilize young females. The vaccines may have been intended to diminish the global population; he went on to say. As the medical establishment had done such a good job of spreading misinformation about the topic, he admitted that he couldn’t express all of that on national media.
The cardiologist continued to say that because there was no medical advantage to getting vaccinated in young people, even one case of myocarditis or pericarditis after the injection “is too many.” However, the CDC will only reconsider the problem later in June though they are aware of hundreds of serious reports of heart-swelling cases in young people.
Because the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database only contained approximately 10% of all vaccine-related adverse effects, McCullough’s team had to look for data elsewhere.
“We have now a whistleblower inside the CMS, and we have two whistleblowers in the CDC,” the doctor said. “We think we have 50,000 dead Americans. Fifty thousand deaths. So we actually have more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bioterrorism by injection.”
According to McCullough, the United States is preparing to mandate citizens to obtain the shots. “We have to stop it, and we have to see what’s behind it,” he concluded.
As a clinician treating CCP Virus patients, McCullough developed an early treatment protocol for people infected with the virus that reduced hospitalizations by nearly 85%. In addition, he began publishing articles on what he discovered. However, regarding actually healing patients and publishing his studies, the doctor said he has “met with resistance at all levels.”
Dr. McCullough practices internal medicine and cardiology. He is the editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, a senior editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, the editor of the textbook Cardiorenal Medicine, and the president of the Cardiorenal Society. McCullough has also served on over two dozen FDA and National Institute of Health vaccine safety monitoring boards.
Here are the million-dollar questions from me to you and then you to me: “Do you believe what you read here today?”
Your question to me is: “Dan, do YOU believe what you published here today?”
I must be honest: I’ve checked for the factual basis on all four reports. From what I’ve read and from the sources which are available for efficacy and accuracy, I believe the substance of these reports.
That’s the scariest part. The fact that an impartial journalist who follows leads from stories that at best are controversial or at worst true whose results find the stories individually and collectively appear to be factual, should be be breathtaking for our medical and political communities. The fact that neither the medical experts nor politicians have weighed in on these leads me to believe they’re probably true!
Wait a minute: Twitter slapped their label on the first story when tweeted about. Subsequent fact-checkers have given a casual “caution” regarding content. But none have stated the stories are inaccurate or false! We KNOW that if they were false, Big Tech would have reported to the sky their findings of fraud regarding such sensitive story content.
“When it quacks and waddles, 99 times out of a hundred it’s a duck.”
Using that basis, it looks like the duck quacked four times in this case.