Category: Coronavirus

It is unquestionable that there are TOO many COVID-19 gross misrepresentations and lies for us to believe the “experts” really know what the heck they are talking about! Their actions leave us daily wondering which, if any, of the stories we’re told are true, which are lies, and which just might have “some” real information.

To that end, we published Part I of this segment. Today you get Part II.

In this series, we don’t concentrate on the lies we KNOW have been rammed down our throats. We have already done so in every case we have found. But what we ARE going to do today and continue in the weeks and months ahead is present to you the incidents, media reports, medical professionals, and their testimonies based on medical evidence that either confirms or debunks the “facts” we’ve been given by all the experts from Dr. Fauci on down.

Let me prepare you: you will get information on several subjects that will anger you, frighten you, yet will clear some of the questions you have had about the information we’ve been given that just didn’t seem all right. And it will be that way in these reports going forward.

Please understand that we cannot give you a timeline or projection on when, how many, nor contents that will be included in these updates to you. There’s just no way to know. But, based on the initial reports and evidence we give you today, it appears there will be many more to come. We’ll call this series “COVID-19 Evidence and Unanswered Questions.”

Part I

The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.” A Health Impact News subscriber from Europe reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.

The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.) So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured due to COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.

The EudraVigilance database reports that through July 3, 2021 there are 17,503 deaths and 1,687,527 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (CX-024414)
• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH
• COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)
• COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)

Of the total of injuries recorded, half of them (837,588 ) are serious injuries.

“Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”

There’s much more detail in this article that you may want to see. If so, click on this link to go to the details:

Part II

While we promised to not delve into Dr. Fauci’s past discretions and “boo-boos” in his numerous COVID-19 orders and predictions, we, for informational purposes, keep you abrest of any of his new forecasts. He’s up at bat today!

President Joe Biden’s top medical adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci, said there should be more COVID-19 vaccine mandates at the local level.

“I have been of this opinion, and I remain of that opinion, that I do believe at the local level, Jake, there should be more mandates,” Fauci, who has become perhaps the federal government’s public face regarding its COVID-19 response, told CNN on Sunday in reference to vaccine mandates. “There really should be. We’re talking about [a] life-and-death situation. We’ve lost 600,000 Americans already, and we’re still losing more people.”

Fauci then said that if the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fully approves the COVID-19 shots, it would trigger “a lot more mandates” at the local level. Fauci, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, did not elaborate on what he believed a vaccine mandate should look like at the local level.

“I think the hesitancy at the local level of doing mandates is because the vaccines have not been officially, fully approved, but people need to understand that the amount of data right now that shows a high degree of effectiveness and a high degree of safety is more than we’ve ever seen with emergency use authorization,” he added.

There’s much more detail in what Fauci said. (I know that comes as no surprise to you!) To read further, click on this link:

Part III

With millions of people now fully “vaccinated” against the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Virus (COVID-19), it was believed that new “cases” in this population should be on the decline. Recent data, however, suggests that persons who received the vaccine account for roughly half of all deaths from new COVID cases. Out of 92,000 Delta cases reported up until June 21, 117 people died. Fifty deaths (46%) were in wholly vaccinated people, according to data from Public Health England (PHE). The so-called “delta variant” is increasing in the United Kingdom among the vaccinated. They were meant to be immune to the virus, according to the previous government and media statements.

The Delta virus is sweeping the United Kingdom, with 146,000 instances reported in the last two weeks, up 72% from the previous week. Delta infections accounted for 97% of cases by mid-June. Delta shows up in 85% of adults who have had at least one immunization dose and 63% who got two, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. Even with inoculated patients who test “positive” for COVID, “health authorities” maintain that the shots are “working.”

“Not everyone who is inoculated will respond the same way. Those who are elderly or whose immune systems are faulty, damaged, or stressed by some other illness are less likely to mount a robust response than someone younger and fitter,” the scientists said. Regardless of the findings, WSJ reported the scientists claimed that CCP Virus injections are still “highly effective” since “some people will still be vulnerable to the virus even after receiving their shots.” “I think it shows the vaccines are working,” stated an English lecturer and infectious disease physician Tom Wingfield, who supports immunizations.

Meanwhile, the fatality rate from the Delta COVID variant is six times greater among individuals who were fully vaccinated for two weeks or longer than those who never got a shot, according to data released by PHE on Friday, June 18. The data shows that people who are “fully vaccinated,” meaning they received both doses of an mRNA injection, had a nearly eight times higher mortality rate among those who test positive for the Delta variant.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published data on July 10 that showed 9,049 deaths across all age groups due to COVID vaccines, an increase of more than 2,000 from the previous week. The information comes directly from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). In the United States, VAERS is the principal government-funded mechanism for reporting adverse vaccination responses. As a causal connection must be verified, reports filed to VAERS are investigated further. VAERS publishes every Friday all vaccine injury records received as of a specific date, generally a week before the release date.

Between Dec. 14, 2020, and June 18, 2021, a total of 387,087 total adverse events were recorded to VAERS, including 6,113 deaths, an increase of 120 deaths, according to data released on June 18. There were also 31,240 severe trauma reports. Besides, 316.1 million CCP Virus vaccine doses had been delivered in the United States as of June 18. There were 131 million shots of Moderna’s vaccine, 173 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine, and 12 million doses of J&J’s CCP Virus vaccine.

According to data released today, 438,441 total adverse events were reported to VAERS between Dec. 14, 2020, and July 2, 2021, including 9,048 deaths, an increase of 2,063 over the last week. During the same time period, 41,015 serious injuries were reported, up 6,950 from the previous week. In addition, as of July 2, 328.9 million doses of the COVID vaccine have been delivered in the United States. There were 134 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 182 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine, and 13 million doses of J&J’s COVID vaccine.

To see the balance of the demographic breakdown from the VAERS report year-to-date, click on this link:

Part IV

A New York doctor who pioneered the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and zinc to treat COVID-19 (CCV) explained the success of the censored treatment during an interview with Life Site News and spoke about the vaccines, which he said “a group of psychopaths” are trying to administer en masse.   Dr. Vladimir Zelenko said that during the start of the coronavirus outbreak in March 2020 in New York, the state with the most cases, patients were put on ventilators as almost the only treatment, but it was not a very good treatment model because 80 to 90 percent of them were dying.

“Out of the 600,000 dead Americans that we have, we could have prevented 510,000 from going to the hospital and dying,” said Zelenko, who, by applying the hydroxychloroquine and zinc-based treatment to the 3,000 patients in his care, managed to reduce the hospitalization and death rate by 84%.  However, the doctor told LifeSite’s Claire Chretien that Americans who became infected with the coronavirus found that this protocol was not applied by the vast majority of the medical community and that pharmacists did not want to issue prescriptions.

On the contrary, he said, “it has been embraced by world-leading physicians who are honest and capable of deductive reasoning and are not indoctrinated,” but he stressed that unfortunately, 90% of physicians in the U.S. are incapable of independent thinking.

Regarding the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine treatment for treating the coronavirus, he said that there are dozens of studies that corroborate this and added that it is not the only effective drug, noting that ivermectin is one of the most potent preventive measures against infection with the virus. For him, the main reasons why a patient will die from Wuhan coronavirus infection center on “the government you live under and the doctor you choose,” rather than the virus itself.

We were one of the first news outlets to report on Dr. Zelenko’s work in New York at the inception of COVID-19. We wondered where he has been. Now we know. There’s more about this story. If you want more information, click on this link:

Summary

There’s no doubt there’s far more to the “real” story of COVID-19 than we know. It’s haunting to watch as almost daily “new” information shows up that discredits almost all of the advice we’ve been given by our government (and Social Media giants) is only in part truthful, if truthful at all. We certainly don’t have all the answers. But we are participating in an actual “peeling of the onions one layer at a time.” It’s laborious and tedious. But it’s well worth the effort. Make certain you stay close because we never know when we’ll unearth a batch of new “evidence” that the experts just don’t want to share with us or that they maybe just don’t know!

To Download today’s (Monday, July 12, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

 

Friday on “TNN Live,” we welcomed Dr. Richard Fleming to our show. We were introduced to Dr. Fleming by our good friend Sterling Hill — also a medical expert — who shared time with us on Tuesday, June 30, 2021.

I won’t bore you here with details of Dr. Fleming’s career. I’ll just point you to the website http://www.flemingmethod.com where you need to go to find out just how much of an “Expert” is Dr. Fleming. But let me say this: he has no “dog in the hunt.” He doesn’t monetize his information which exhaustively details years of his research into various aspects of diseases which includes all-things COVID-19. He doesn’t practice clinically so he has no storefront to point us to. What he DOES point us to are facts.

For approximately 40-minutes on Friday, July 2nd, Dr. Fleming share reams of information with us you need to hear! And you can hear that interview in its entirety by simply clicking on the file below. When you do so, avoid interruptions and listen closely to the truths he shares and the sources he points us to for further facts.

Dr. Richard Fleming:

TNN Live-Dr. Richard Fleming Interview July 2, 2021 – 7:2:21, 11.29 AM

 

 

The news and information — no, actually “the truth” — is being revealed daily to us now about COVID-19, our pandemic, and all ancillary specifics. And the actual facts are proving to NOT align with all of the “facts” that the experts have inundated us with for longer than a year. More and more disinformation shows up today at the same time which makes discernment of facts even more difficult.

To that end, we at TruthNewsNetwork continue to grab information that has been proven “beyond doubt” to be scientific facts. And we’re giving you all of that as we receive it from some of the greatest intellectual scientific minds who specialize in each area pertaining to COVID-19. Today we give you another offering of that same information.

This comes from Dr. Joseph Mercola, an osteopathic physician, best-selling author, and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health. His primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health. This story is full of references complete with hyperlinks that, when accessed, provide copious amounts of verification of the information he’s providing here. Feel confident when reading that you’re reading facts. And please take advantage of the links and sources to judge for yourself our saying with confidence Dr. Mercola is an expert.

Let’s get started!

A dramatic rise in antimicrobial overuse is fueling the rise of dangerous new pathogens

“Antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest public health challenges of our time,” declares the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). And while antibiotic resistance and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) took a backseat to the COVID-19 pandemic, the problem hasn’t gone away.

Antibiotic resistance (AR) refers to bacteria resistant to antibiotics. Antimicrobial resistance is a broader term used to describe resistance to drugs among a variety of microbes, including bacteria, parasites, viruses, and fungi.

The tragedy of this problem is that our body depends on many of these microbes for proper function. Current practices are harming these helpful microbes and creating more dangerous ones. The WHO (World Health Organization) says AMR is one of the top 10 global public health threats to humanity, but it rarely makes front-page news, especially now that COVID has entered the arena.

The COVID-19 pandemic—and its unprecedented promotion of hand sanitizer, antimicrobials (including antibiotics), and disinfectants—has even made AMR worse.

“There has been a rapid increase in multidrug-resistant organisms,” Taiwanese researchers warned in an article published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents earlier this year. The authors call for the “appropriate prescription and optimized use of antimicrobials.” And yet, the fear of COVID continues to overshadow the growing threat of AMR, which will likely surpass the number of COVID-19 deaths by at least threefold annually by 2050.

“The scary thing is, [AMR is] insidious and silent. The latest figures suggest AMR will cause over 10 million deaths per year by 2050. This is more than deaths from cancer and diabetes combined, and triple the current COVID-19 death toll of 3.4 million deaths worldwide since 2019,” writes Dr. Tina Joshi, a lecturer in molecular microbiology at the University of Plymouth, in an article for NewStatesman.

Antimicrobial Resistance Grew During COVID-19

While the world stopped due to COVID-19, the use of antimicrobial agents—for disinfecting surfaces and public spaces and treating patients—increased. The high rates of antimicrobial agent usage in COVID-19 patients are now being blamed for a rapid rise in multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including:

• Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumonia
• Carbapenem-resistant New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing Enterobacterales
• Acinetobacter baumannii
• Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
• Pan-echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata
• Multitriazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus

In many cases, COVID-19 patients have presented with secondary infections with multidrug-resistant organisms. Fungal co-infections in COVID-19 patients are also common, as is antibiotic treatment, with one report from China suggesting that more than 70 percent of COVID-19 patients received antibiotics.

Other research suggested that 84.7 percent of hospitalized COVID-19 patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy, while a report published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy stated that up to 95 percent of COVID-19 patients in some hospitals are prescribed antibiotics.

As for why so many patients were excessively treated with antibiotics (which kill bacteria) despite COVID-19 being caused by a virus (SARS-CoV-2), researchers suggested that co-bacterial fungal or secondary infections were only part of the reason. Other reasons included:

• Since the symptoms of COVID-19, such as cough and fever, may also occur in bacterial pneumonia, “clinicians empirically add a broad-spectrum antibiotic despite the suspicion of a viral origin.”
• Anxiety and uncertainty regarding COVID-19 and an absence of effective SARS-CoV-2 treatments potentially drove “widespread and excessive prescription of antibiotics.”

Excessive Antimicrobials Affect Environment

AMR has clear toxicological effects on the environment, in part because patients excrete a large proportion of drugs they ingest, which allows drug residues and drug metabolites to be released into rivers and coastal waters.

A team from the University of Plymouth in England conducted a risk assessment to determine the potential environmental impact of prescribing COVID-19 patients antibiotics, which revealed, “The data for amoxicillin indicate a potential environmental concern for selection of AMR.” The team urged such assessments to be carried out in the future to keep tabs on the potentially disastrous effects of pandemic prescribing habits on AMR.

“This will facilitate the development of a robust evidence base in order to guide antibiotic prescribing choices that are less likely to increase AMR and have the least environmental impact,” they wrote.

In other words, there are so many antimicrobial drugs being used during COVID-19 that these substances are making their way into the environment and triggering microbes to develop resistance.

Even the World Health Organization made it clear that countries were at risk of the accelerated spread of AMR due to the COVID-19 pandemic. They cited data showing that antibiotic use increased throughout the pandemic. According to research by the WHO in Europe, about 79 percent to 96 percent of people who reported taking antibiotics didn’t have COVID-19 but were taking them in the hopes of preventing infection, even though antibiotics don’t work against viral infections.

Further, the WHO noted that while about 15 percent of people with severe COVID-19 may develop a bacterial co-infection that would require antibiotics, 75 percent of COVID-19 patients were actually receiving such drugs.

Why New Antibiotics Aren’t the Answer

Clearly, alternatives to antibiotics are needed—and fast. It’s been estimated that the pharmaceutical industry will need upwards of $37 billion over the next decade to replace antibiotics that no longer work. However, drug companies have little financial incentive to innovate new antibiotics, so unless taxpayers end up footing the bill, it’s unlikely that such products will enter the market anytime soon.

There are 43 antibiotics in clinical development, but none of them show much promise for solving rapidly rising AMR, as innovation is stagnant. Most “new” antibiotics brought to the market are variations of drug classes that have been around since the 1980s. WHO’s annual Antibacterial Pipeline Report also found that antibiotics currently in development are insufficient to tackle AMR:

“The 2020 report reveals a near static pipeline with only a few antibiotics being approved by regulatory agencies in recent years. Most of these agents in development offer limited clinical benefit over existing treatments, with 82 percent of the recently approved antibiotics being derivatives of existing antibiotic classes with well-established drug resistance. Therefore, the rapid emergence of drug resistance to these new agents is expected.”

Pesticides Make Antibiotic Resistance Worse

The overuse of antimicrobials during COVID-19 is only one piece of the puzzle. Widely used herbicides such as glyphosate (Roundup) and dicamba (Kamba) also play a role.

University of Canterbury researchers revealed that agrichemicals and antibiotics in combination increase the evolution of antibiotic resistance such that bacteria may develop antibiotic resistance up to 100,000 times faster when they’re exposed to certain herbicides in the environment.

Herbicides promote antibiotic resistance by priming pathogens to more readily become resistant to antibiotics. This includes Roundup (the actual formulation of Roundup, not just its active ingredient glyphosate in isolation), which was shown to increase the antibiotic-resistant prowess of E. coli and salmonella, along with dicamba and 2,4-D.

Rodale News reported: “The way Roundup causes this effect is likely by causing the bacteria to turn on a set of genes that are normally off, [study author] Heinemann says. These genes are for ‘pumps’ or ‘porins,’ proteins that pump out toxic compounds or reduce the rate at which they get inside of the bacteria.

“Once these genes are turned on by the herbicide, then the bacteria can also resist antibiotics. If bacteria were to encounter only the antibiotic, they would instead have been killed.

“In a sense, the herbicide is ‘immunizing’ the bacteria to the antibiotic. … This change occurs at levels commonly used on farm field crops, lawns, gardens, and parks.”

In the United States, industrial agriculture even uses the antibiotics oxytetracycline and streptomycin as pesticides on agricultural plants, a practice that’s banned in the European Union and Brazil due to rising concerns over antibiotic resistance. But in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency approved the “maximum level” of oxytetracycline for use in citrus fruits in December 2018—just days after approving residues of the drug on fruit.

Agricultural Antibiotics Can’t Be Ignored

Industrially raised farm animals living on concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) have emerged as another major reservoir of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Due to poor farming practices, including the use of low doses of antibiotics in animal feed for purposes of growth promotion, antibiotic resistance in farm animals is on the rise, threatening human and animal health along with food production sustainability.

Worldwide, most antibiotics are used not for human illness but for livestock. Overall, 73 percent of the antibiotics sold globally are used in farm animals raised for food, typically on CAFOs. Researchers explained the glaring role of CAFOs in antibiotic resistance in Environmental Health Perspectives:

“This prolonged use of antibiotics, especially at low levels, presents a risk of not killing the bacteria while promoting their resistance by selecting for resistant populations.

“The resistance genes can pass readily from one kind of bacteria to another. Thus, workers in the animal units may become colonized with resistant organisms and can pass them on to co-workers and family members, or friends.

“Consumers of meat may also become colonized through mishandling of raw meat or through insufficient cooking. Ultimately, these genes may pass into pathogens, and diseases that were formerly treatable will be capable of causing severe illness or death.”

In addition, most antibiotics ingested by animals are not metabolized but, rather, excreted. This waste is then applied to soil as a fertilizer, which may then be sprayed with herbicide. The antibiotic-resistant microbes can also be carried elsewhere by houseflies.

Pandemic Stretches Limits of Optimal Antibiotic Usage

Increased AMR is yet another fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, which will combine with the already perilous AMR pandemic in progress, resulting in further deaths and environmental destruction. Writing in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, researchers stated, “The ongoing pandemic is stretching the limits of optimal antibiotic stewardship,” and they called for an end to unnecessary use of antimicrobial agents:

“Moreover, unnecessary use of antimicrobial agents would be associated with a significant economic burden on healthcare systems, which could be directly caused by the drug itself and indirectly caused by healthcare costs for the management of drug-related adverse events.”

Beyond this, choosing organic foods, including grass-fed meats and dairy products, can help you avoid exposure to antibiotic residues in the food supply while also supporting food growers who aren’t contributing to AMR. Unfortunately, as the world continues to put all of its attention on COVID-19, the catastrophe of AMR is getting worse instead of better.

Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com. An osteopathic physician, best-selling author, and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, his primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health. This article was originally published on Mercola.com.

To Download Today’s (Tuesday, June 29, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

It has been exhausting since late January of 2020 to investigate, explore, dig for facts both good and bad, about everything that’s part of the COVID-19 story. Honestly, in normal circumstances in which good or bad things happen at the national and/or international levels, news media operations have good access to information. It has seemed from the beginning of COVID-19 and our subsequent pandemic, facts, evidence, details, and pros and cons of everything to do with it all have been cloaked in a mysterious “off-limits room” available only to a select few. Subsequently, TruthNewsNetwork — from the onset — has been skeptical about what we have all been spoon-fed as “facts,” provided to us by the “Experts.” And, sure enough, constant changes in the facts, arguments about every part of all this happen daily between medical professionals from around the globe, and citizens of the planet have been kept in darkness. We don’t know what we should believe and we don’t know who to believe.

In the U.S., our so-called “go-to” expert was (and still is) Dr. Anthony Fauci.

We will not launch into the multiple 180-degree changes in the absolutes Dr. Fauci gave to us from the White House briefing room. Nor will we detail the verified lies he’s been caught telling. But what we ARE going to do today and continue in the weeks and months ahead is present to you the incidents, media reports, medical professionals, and their testimonies based on medical evidence that either confirms or debunks the “facts” we’ve been given by all the experts from Dr. Fauci on down.

Let me prepare you: beginning today, you will get information on several subjects that will anger you, frighten you, yet will clear some of the questions you have had about the information we’ve been given that just didn’t seem all right. And it will be that way in these reports going forward.

Please understand that we cannot give you a timeline or projection on when, how many, nor contents that will be included in these updates to you. There’s just no way to know. But, based on the initial reports and evidence we give you today, it appears there will be many more to come. We’ll call this series “COVID-19 Evidence and Unanswered Questions.”

Part One: Suspicious Airline Pilot Deaths at British Airways

Big Tech and the corporate media are moving furiously to suppress the news that four British Airways pilots have died in recent days after reportedly getting the Covid vaccine. A June 17 tweet included a photo of the four pilots which were accompanied by condolence books. Twitter’s censors marked the tweet as being in “violation of the Twitter rules.”

The reported age of the pilots was the mid-30s to 50s. Since pilots receive regular health checks, no known disease or condition that would lead to a healthy pilot suddenly dying was reported.

In a voice recording that was posted on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, an unidentified male says he has spoken to a “friend who’s a BA pilot” and explains “things are getting crazy” after his fellow pilots passed away. All three platforms have since removed the recording, citing “false information.” The recording continued: “They’ve had the third BA pilot die in the last seven days, yeah? Third pilot dead in the last week. The first two guys were in their forties and fifties; this guy, mid-thirties, perfectly fit, no underlying conditions. He gets his second jab and he’s dead within days, exactly the same with the first two. Because of this, BA is now in crisis talks with the government about whether to allow vaccinated pilots to fly. The issue with that of course is that about 80%, according to my friend in BA, 80-85% have been injected.”

The corporate media, Big Tech, and it appears even British Airways are insisting that it is completely coincidental that four healthy pilots who reportedly received the Covid jab died within days of each other.

In a vague June 17 Twitter post, British Airways said: “Sadly four members of our pilot community passed away recently. Our thoughts are with their family and friends. However, there is no truth whatsoever in the claims on social media speculating that the four deaths are linked.”

Reuters moved swiftly in an attempt to bury the story, issuing a June 17 “fact check,” which did nothing to counter the fact that four healthy pilots died after getting the jab, but only reported the comment in the recording which said British Airlines was in “crisis talks” over the pilot deaths.

In its “fact check,” Reuters noted: “Reuters presented the claims to British Airways, which said they were unfounded and that no such talks were underway with the government. The spokesperson, however, confirmed the authenticity of the four condolence books, as four company pilots had recently passed away.”

Part Two: Moderna Is Outed For COVID-19 Vaccine Work Before January 1, 2020

A document reveals that Moderna, along with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Fauci, agreed in Dec. 2019 to transfer coronavirus RNA vaccine applicants to the University of North Carolina. Signatories to the document were Dr. Ralph Baric on Dec. 12, 2019, and Jacqueline Quay on Dec. 16, 2019, both for the University of North Carolina, Dr. Amy F. Petrik on Dec. 12, 2019, and Dr. Barney Graham for NIAID, and Sunny Himansu and Shaun Ryan, both on Dec. 17, 2019, for Moderna.

All signatures were made before there was any public knowledge of the coronavirus occurrence, as officially December 31, 2019, was when World Health Organization (WHO) learned that there were suspected cases of unknown pneumonia in Wuhan, China, and they did not know the cause. On Jan. 9, 2020, it was only that WHO released the information that China determined that the cause of this new pneumonia was a new coronavirus. So before the existence of a new coronavirus was known, Moderna, in conjunction with NIAID, led by Dr. Fauci, transferred the coronavirus RNA vaccine technology to Dr. Baric.

Let’s break down those involved:

• Moderna had the technology for a COVID-19 vaccine before the world knew of the existence of this new coronavirus.
• Dr. Fauci is accused of funding the Wuhan lab in gain-of-function research, which is where the new coronavirus likely came from and at the same time participating in this deal. Fauci must have already known about the existence of this new virus.
• Dr. Baric, who conducted gain-of-function research in his lab at the University of North Carolina and collaborated with Chinese researcher Shi Zhengli in conducting these same experiments in the Wuhan lab. Both received funding from Fauci.

Moreover, as early as 2018, Baric seemed to know that there would be the next pandemic. At a symposium with the name “Imagining the next flu pandemic, and preventing it!” held at a University of North Carolina Education Center, the epidemiologist, in a controversial presentation, talked about how “Pandemics are times of opportunity” for people to make political, financial and personal gains.

Dr. Baric was to sign a letter sent by Dr. Peter Daszak to the scientific journal The Lancet, to pressure the scientific community to rule out that the new coronavirus originated in a laboratory. He did not sign the letter at Daszak’s request. It might bring attention to the fact that he was also researching gain-of-function and that the letter might lose validity due to a conflict of interest, Trending Politics reported. It should be noted that four close associates of Baric did sign the letter.

This new document fuels the theory that the virus left the Wuhan laboratory long before the CCP made official the existence of the outbreak of the new coronavirus.

Part Three: A CCP Virus Variant Is Much More Lethal Than Thought

According to data released by Public Health England (PHE) on Friday, June 18, the fatality rate from the Delta CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Virus variant is six times greater among individuals who were fully vaccinated for two weeks or longer than those who never got a shot.

“This is reminiscent of the ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) phenomenon that has been seen for other vaccines and that has been expressed as a point of concern among many scientists for the COVID vaccines,” experienced researcher Stephanie Seneff at Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory reported. Earlier efforts with CCP Virus vaccines were hampered by ADE, which typically resulted in increased lung illness in injected lab animals. It prompted experts to advise scientists in 2012 to proceed with “caution” while developing human CCP Virus vaccines that could cause increased lung illness. “I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-Co-V2 strains,” Seneff stated.

There were 26 deaths out of 4,087 patients who were fully vaccinated 14 days or more before testing positive for the Delta CCP Virus strain. According to data released in a June 18 report titled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16,” this compared to a death rate of 0.00636 %, which was 6.6 times higher than the rate of 0.000957 %—or 34 deaths among 35,521 positive Delta cases among those who did not get a shot.

For Delta, a version that PHE identifies as the “dominant variant” in the UK, encompassing “91 percent of sequenced cases,” both mortality rates among the unvaccinated and vaccinated were extremely low (less than 1 % of all positive cases).

The Delta version of the CCP Virus pandemic was defined as more easily disseminated between people in a risk analysis issued on Friday, June 18, but it was also classified as a variety with “low infection severity.”

Completely vaccinated individuals were hospitalized at a higher rate than unvaccinated people in the UK. Two percent of vaccinated patients (84 of 4,087) who tested positive for the Delta variant were admitted to the hospital, compared to 1.48 % of unvaccinated ones (527 of 35,521), according to the most recent technical briefing report.

According to PHE’s current risk assessment for SARS-C0V-2 variations, a shocking 61 % of the cases sequenced were the Delta form (B.1.617.2). This indicated that the Delta variant, which was initially discovered in India, is more prevalent in the UK than the Alpha form, which caused a spike last year. It was classified as a variation of concern by the World Health Organization (WHO), which has given it the name Delta (VOC). It continued to see “significantly increased transmissibility” and a “growing number of countries reporting outbreaks associated with this variant,” WHO reported.

People completely vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine have more than five times lower levels of neutralizing antibodies against the Delta variant than against other versions, according to a report published in The Lancet on Friday, June 11.

Part Four: U.S. Well-Know Doctor Shares Certainty of Wuhan Lab Weaponization of COVID-19

Dr. Peter McCullough, an American professor of medicine and Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University, stated in an interview last week that the world has been exposed to a form of bioterrorism and that the repression of early Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Virus treatments “was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine.”

During a June 11 conference with Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, a German trial attorney, McCullough said that he believed bioterrorism had occurred in two waves, with the first being the spread of the CCP Virus and the second being the spread of harmful vaccines, which he claimed may have already killed up to 50,000 people in the U.S. According to McCullough, both the coronavirus and the vaccines sent “the spike protein, [which is] the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research” to the human body.

“We know that this is phase two of bioterrorism, we don’t know who’s behind it, but we know that they want a needle in every arm to inject messenger RNA or adenoviral DNA into every human being,” he claimed, warning the public about the injections. “They want every human being.”

Later, McCullough expressed concern that the experimental immunizations could cause cancer and sterilize young females. The vaccines may have been intended to diminish the global population; he went on to say. As the medical establishment had done such a good job of spreading misinformation about the topic, he admitted that he couldn’t express all of that on national media.

The cardiologist continued to say that because there was no medical advantage to getting vaccinated in young people, even one case of myocarditis or pericarditis after the injection “is too many.” However, the CDC will only reconsider the problem later in June though they are aware of hundreds of serious reports of heart-swelling cases in young people.

Because the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database only contained approximately 10% of all vaccine-related adverse effects, McCullough’s team had to look for data elsewhere.

“We have now a whistleblower inside the CMS, and we have two whistleblowers in the CDC,” the doctor said. “We think we have 50,000 dead Americans. Fifty thousand deaths. So we actually have more deaths due to the vaccine per day than certainly the viral illness by far. It’s basically propagandized bioterrorism by injection.”

According to McCullough, the United States is preparing to mandate citizens to obtain the shots. “We have to stop it, and we have to see what’s behind it,” he concluded.

As a clinician treating CCP Virus patients, McCullough developed an early treatment protocol for people infected with the virus that reduced hospitalizations by nearly 85%. In addition, he began publishing articles on what he discovered. However, regarding actually healing patients and publishing his studies, the doctor said he has “met with resistance at all levels.”

Dr. McCullough practices internal medicine and cardiology. He is the editor of Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, a senior editor of the American Journal of Cardiology, the editor of the textbook Cardiorenal Medicine, and the president of the Cardiorenal Society. McCullough has also served on over two dozen FDA and National Institute of Health vaccine safety monitoring boards.

Summary

Here are the million-dollar questions from me to you and then you to me: “Do you believe what you read here today?”

Your question to me is: “Dan, do YOU believe what you published here today?”

I must be honest: I’ve checked for the factual basis on all four reports. From what I’ve read and from the sources which are available for efficacy and accuracy, I believe the substance of these reports.

That’s the scariest part. The fact that an impartial journalist who follows leads from stories that at best are controversial or at worst true whose results find the stories individually and collectively appear to be factual, should be be breathtaking for our medical and political communities. The fact that neither the medical experts nor politicians have weighed in on these leads me to believe they’re probably true!

Wait a minute: Twitter slapped their label on the first story when tweeted about. Subsequent fact-checkers have given a casual “caution” regarding content. But none have stated the stories are inaccurate or false! We KNOW that if they were false, Big Tech would have reported to the sky their findings of fraud regarding such sensitive story content.

“When it quacks and waddles, 99 times out of a hundred it’s a duck.”

Using that basis, it looks like the duck quacked four times in this case.

To Download Today’s (Thursday, June 24, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

Ever since it became acceptable to suggest the coronavirus may have leaked from the Wuhan lab conducting research on bat virus strains, one name, in particular, has kept popping up.

That would be Peter Daszak.

Daszak is the president of EcoHealth Alliance, which describes itself as “a global environmental health nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting wildlife and public health from the emergence of disease.”

EcoHealth received a $3.7 million grant from the National Institutes of Health in 2014: that’s Dr. Anthony Fauci. The organization was involved with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and it is believed that Daszak passed on some portion of the grant to subsidize gain-of-function research there.

Following the recent release of over 3,200 pages of Anthony Fauci’s emails from the first six months of the pandemic, we learned that Daszak emailed Fauci on April 18, 2020, to thank him for dismissing the theory that the coronavirus may have escaped from a lab.

Daszak wrote: “I just wanted to say a personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Daszak was also the writer and organizer of a statement signed by 27 public health scientists published in the elite medical journal The Lancet on Feb. 19, 2020. The letter effectively shut down debate over the origins of the pandemic.

It read in part: “The rapid, open, and transparent sharing of data on this outbreak is now being threatened by rumors and misinformation around its origins. We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

This letter did more than anything else to turn the tide away from the lab leak theory. After all, that many medical “experts” who scream of “rumors and misinformation” being so bold as to write a letter debunking all of the “not-so-experts” who can add two-plus-two and come up with 4 every time but are NOT their equals is pretty much standard operating procedure these days. And then there’s Fauci strutting in the wings of the stage of “COVID-19.” All they did was confirm the insanity HE has shared with us all for about 18 months now.

Now we’re learning that The Lancet has set up a task force to investigate the pandemic’s origins. Gee, that’s a novel idea! Why not just go ahead and listen to the REAL experts who told us of the Wuhan laboratory origin of COVID-19 more than a year ago? But, I forgot: NO ONE has the knowledge and expertise in these matters, as does Dr. Fauci.

In addition to “analyzing data on all of the theories put forward on the origins of COVID,” the task force, we are told, will “review thoroughly and objectively all publicly available evidence, particularly the peer-reviewed literature, and conduct interviews with key leaders in science, medicine, policy, and civil society.”

Here’s the catch: Daszak has been selected to lead the effort.

Are they kidding us? That REALLY makes sense! Why not just go ahead and send the fox in to find out who’s been killing the chickens in the henhouse?

Steve Watson at Summit News wrote, “ANYBODY but this guy would be more suitable. Dr. Peter Daszak, who is heading up this task force, is perhaps the least suitable scientist on the planet to objectively analyze the data, given his track record.”

Daszak was also the lead investigator on the World Health Organization team that traveled to Wuhan in February. Predictably, the team called the lab leak theory “extremely unlikely.” Watson wrote that Daszak reached this conclusion within three hours.

Daszak admitted in March that he personally vouched for the WIV, leading investigators not to request access to data deleted by the lab in September 2019.

In a video recorded in December 2019, shortly before the coronavirus spread throughout the world, Daszak is interviewed by virologist Vincent Racaniello. Daszak tells Racaniello:

“You can manipulate [coronaviruses] in the lab pretty easily. The spiked protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus. You can get the sequence, you can build the protein, insert into [the] backbone of another virus and do some work in a lab.”

Watson reported that “Daszak was later employed as an ‘expert fact checker’ by Facebook when it was monitoring and removing ‘misinformation’ about the origins of COVID on its platform, much of which was credible scientific research.”

Facebook has since reversed its policy of removing any posts suggesting the coronavirus was manufactured.

Fox News’ Laura Ingraham and Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a physician himself, recently discussed attempts by members of the international medical community to steer the public away from the lab leak theory.

Asked about Daszak, Paul said, “Peter Daszak is not a disinterested party. He’s not just looking for the truth. He was the funder of the research in Wuhan. So he has a self-interest in not revealing this because it turns out the lab — the virus came from the lab.”

“This is a big deal,” Paul added. “So any investigation going forward, it can’t include Tony Fauci, can’t include Peter Daszak, because they were the ones who funded the lab. They have a conflict of interest with coming to the truth.”

Summary

Will this COVID-19 insanity ever stop? Will someone — ANYONE — ever hold Dr. Anthony Fauci accountable for even one of his plethora of misrepresentations, flip-flops, and outright lies to the American people for all-things COVID-19? After all, 600,000 Americans have died from COVID-19 complications!

Forget about President Biden doing so. After all, the Democrat Party leaders in Congress are the ones who anointed Fauci “COVID Czar” and forced him on Donald Trump. They wanted Fauci in the White House daily “informing” Americans while trying to make Trump look like a clown. A clown was certainly revealed during all this, but it wasn’t President Trump. It was Fauci. And if his faux leadership was so fatal, this entire debacle would be laughable.

And the raucous humor continues! “Well, there may be something to that Wuhan lab origin of COVID-19.” Duh! I don’t know about you, but we “floated” that idea as a “probability” over a year ago. Facebook blocked it as did YouTube, Google, Instagram, and even some “real” news sites. If you didn’t toe the company line, you were toast.

And now those sycophants in the media and the large group of medical hacks have mud on their faces. But even with that happening and looking daily more likely than Fauci’s ideas, the Left STILL stoke the fires of Fauci’s credibility day after day after day.

When a liar is caught lying continually, how do you know which thing the liar says is OK to believe?

Answer: you don’t know! Why? Because most of what the liar says is probably untruthful.

Common sense dictates the summary dismissal of EVERYTHING the liar says. After all, listening and believing the wrong one is likely to kill you. Just ask any one of those 600,000 Americans who did just that.

Fauci is complicit in all this. And Fauci needs to go!

NOTICE:

We are pleased to announce that as of this past Monday, June 14, 2021, “TNN Live” podcasts are now available to everyone at two new locations: iTunes Podcasts and Spotify Podcasts. Simultaneous with the daily addition of our broadcasts to each day’s story here, each show is loaded into these two international podcast platforms. This is just more evidence that you guys are not only immersing yourselves here at TruthNewsNet.org and listening to our streaming show live, but you’re also sharing what we do with your friends. That you for your support and acceptance of this form of media news dissemination. You’re what makes TruthNewsNetwork work!

 

To Download Today’s (Wednesday, June 16, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

We are receiving COVID-19 information in floods every day! It’s uncanny. It appears that some U.S. government officials and the Mainstream Media have purposely protected the release of anything that might be perceived when released as bad news. This material includes mounds of information that scientists from numerous specialties have found regarding pretty much every aspect of COVID-19.

These “discoveries” come from all across the “COVID-19 Board:” everything from its source (or sources), its scientific and biologic makeup, whether it appeared naturally or was manipulated, its symptoms, its treatment(s), how to control its spread, medications that are safe and/or dangerous, and just how deadly it is.

“Wait a minute,” you say; “Dr. Anthony Fauci has led the charge to unearth ALL of this information. He’s the most knowledgeable person there is on infectious diseases. He has ALL the facts!”

Yes, we all believed this to be true. But, sadly, news that debunks these so-called “attributes” of Dr. Fauci and some other “experts” is also flooding the news just as rapidly daily. More and more facts prove that Dr. Fauci has been anything but forthright with us about all things COVID-19. In fact, there is even a possibility of Dr. Fauci being in criminal jeopardy for his actions in this regard.

To this end, TruthNewsNetwork is committed to daily (as these releases occur) bring to our TNN family ALL the information as quickly as we receive it and verify its validity. So yes, there is a plethora of COVID-19 information and news almost daily. And it’s critical to all to have access to it to make decisions for yourself and your families.

We begin this process that will be ongoing with today’s COVID-19 information we have unearthed during the past three days. This has ALL been documented and verified as accurate. In fact, some hyperlinks provided will take you to the sources.

Let’s get started!

COVID Deaths Among Fully Vaccinated Patients Triple

Over the past month, deaths and hospitalizations from infection with COVID-19 have tripled in the United States among those fully vaccinated.

According to a data report released in late May by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between January 1 and April 30, 2021, there were a total of 10,262 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines “breakthrough infections,” defined as coronavirus infections in fully vaccinated persons, from 46 U.S. states and territories.

Approximately 10% (995) of the patients infected after vaccination before April 30 were hospitalized. The agency also reported that it had received reports of 160 fully vaccinated patients who died from complications with the infection.

Just days after the above report, the CDC website reported that 3,016 fully vaccinated patients with the COVID-19 vaccine had developed a “breakthrough infection” and had been hospitalized or died during May. COVID deaths of vaccinated patients totaled 535 as of June 1 compared with 160 deaths reported a month earlier.

Without explaining their decision, the CDC reported that as of May 1, it would only be counting cases and infections of the CCP Virus in vaccinated patients who end up hospitalized or die, discounting the nearly 90% of cases that are not hospitalized and do not die but do report vaccine failure. The controversial move clarifies a major gap in data collection on vaccine efficacy, so future reported numbers will be completely skewed.

In addition, since 27% of reported cases are asymptomatic, there also remains a large portion of vaccinated persons who are asymptomatic and could be spreading the disease.

Following this same policy, the agency also does not count as “breakthrough infection” cases, i.e., infected persons already vaccinated, who received only one dose of the vaccines that recommend at least two doses. This is even though one dose is supposed to generate a large percentage of protection against the virus.

A large number of deaths of vaccinated people raises the question of whether the deaths are really due to having contracted the virus or whether they were caused by some adverse effect resulting from the vaccine, which is still in the process of being tested.

The possible side effect that could cause the death of a vaccinated patient is known as “ADE” (antibody overreaction), basically, a hyperimmune response that triggers dangerous inflammatory processes of the disease, which basically and ironically generates the worst outcome of the disease among those who have been vaccinated.

These reactions have been seen before with other experimental vaccines; such is the case of 130 children who lost their lives in the Philippines in 2017 after receiving an experimental dengue vaccine, as reported by the journal Science.

This type of analysis on factual and publicly available data is usually not published by the hegemonic media, who promote along with the government the massive vaccination plans without warning of the existing risks.

However, a large sector of the population continues to be reluctant to receive any of the experimental vaccines currently in circulation, which creates a major problem for the Biden administration’s stated goals of achieving a supposed vaccine-produced immunity against the CCP Virus.

China Applied For Patent On Its CCP Virus Vaccine Before Pandemic Declared

Investigations into the now not-so-mysterious origin of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Virus reveal that a renowned Chinese scientist who worked at U.S. universities applied for a patent for the vaccine just five weeks after the regime declared human-to-human transmission.

Yusen Zhou is registered as the lead inventor of the vaccine in the patent on behalf of the “Institute of Military Medicine, PLA Academy of Military Science,” which serves the CCP, The Australian reported on June 4.

Zhou died mysteriously only a few months later, aged 54. Despite having had a brilliant career and being decorated for his military services, he received no official recognition. Only a brief notification in a newspaper reported his death.

Meanwhile, Nikolai Petrovsky, a medical researcher at Flinders University in Australia who worked on creating a vaccine against the CCP Virus, said it was a “remarkable achievement” to develop it in such a short time as Zhou and his team did.

Given this “achievement,” he did not rule out the possibility that they were working on it earlier.

“This is something we have never seen achieved before, which raises the question of whether this work may have started much earlier,” Petrovsky commented.

The complex plot of the origin of the virus involves senior U.S. officials, who tried to deflect attention away from the Wuhan Virology Laboratory in Wuhan, China, raising suspicions that they may have wanted to shirk their possible responsibility.

“They were reluctant to give credence to the theory that COVID-19 (CCP Virus) might be the result of a lab leak, fearing that it would expose their complicity in providing funding to a facility that intelligence agencies suspected might have triggered the pandemic,” according to writer and researcher Sharri Markson.

Markson is preparing a book, “What Really Happened In Wuhan.” She also reported on CCP projects on biological weapons for an eventual World War III years earlier.

“Chinese military scientists talked about weaponizing SARS coronaviruses five years before the COVID-19 pandemic in a paper that also predicted that a third world war would be fought with biological weapons,” she wrote in one of her tweets.

Japan Times reported, “The U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, had since 2014 funded dangerous laboratory research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to redesign bat coronaviruses and make them more infectious for experimental purposes.”

In this context, President Joe Biden did not follow the project initiated by Former President Trump to restructure the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO is seriously implicated in the disastrous spread of the virus worldwide. Nevertheless, Biden reinstated the WHO on his first day as President.

Moreover, he signed on Jan. 26 an executive order directed at federal agencies, calling any reference to the pandemic racist if the “geographic location of its origin” was mentioned. Finally, he roadblocked any possibility of holding the CCP responsible for the deaths and damage caused by the virus, as many lawmakers have proposed.

Thus: “Biden was making it official U.S. policy to disassociate the virus from its source of origin—China. However, it is still considered correct to refer to variants of the virus by their geographical origin,” argues author Brahma Chellaney.

COVID-19 Must Be Artificial Based On Its “Rare” Genome

COVID-19 as a reprisal from nature on humans was impossible, according to two American experts on Sunday, who said that its rare genome combination could not be found naturally on any coronavirus.

Dr. Steven Quay and Richard Muller said that “damning science” suggests COVID-19 is a product of a souped-up virus experiment. The virus was deliberately modified to reach utmost infectious capacity, in an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal Sunday, June 6.

“The most compelling reason to favor the lab leak hypothesis is firmly based in science,” the experts wrote, who pointed to the virus’ rare genome, which proves that it was incubated in a laboratory environment.

Among the 36 sequencing patterns, the SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated the sequencing combination called “CGG-CGG,” or “double CGG,” which the men said has “never been found naturally.”

If the virus were to have evolved naturally, it must adapt to infect the human body through a sequence from cousin viruses that foster the ability, such as SARS or MERS, which are natural respiratory diseases issued from coronavirus. However, both the SARS and MERS do not have double CGG in their genome.

Since scientists have never found double CGG in a natural environment, the only explanation is that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered.

“A virus simply cannot pick up a sequence from another virus if that sequence isn’t present in any other virus,” the experts noted.

Talking of the possibility that such an event may still occur naturally, the experts argued: “why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG.”

“Yes, it could have happened randomly, through mutations. But do you believe that? At the minimum, this fact—that the coronavirus, with all its random possibilities, took the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers—implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be laboratory escape,” they sternly stated.

Meanwhile, in gain-of-function research, such combination was, in fact, one of the preferable methods that microbiologists employ to make a virus more infectious or more lethal.

“That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it,” the two men said, adding that the sequence was the superior choice over the other 35 patterns because “it creates a useful beacon that permits the scientists to track the insertion in the laboratory.”

The experts questioned the chance of SARS-CoV-2 learning how to infect humans outside of laboratory intervention.

“Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?”

Summary

We cannot sit by idly waiting for facts to be spoon-fed to us to enhance some partisan narrative. Every American is being forced to make life-and-death decisions almost daily regarding everything wrapped in COVID-19 information that, in many cases, has been only leaked in timing politically beneficial to those monetizing COVID-19. Yes, I said “monetizing.” Many so-called experts have found ways to turn the mysteries of COVID into financial windfalls. And this travesty puts the lives of Americans in danger daily.

We’re not name-calling; we’re just doing what we do as journalists: researching, discovering, verifying, and bring facts to Americans. That’s one fundamental that is NOT for sale.

If you have questions about any of this, I say, “Good for you.” Question everything! But don’t stop there. Get on your horse to do research and confirm the validity of what you’ve heard compared to what we present.

Find the truth. Make your decisions based on facts and not emotions. And, most importantly, never put your life or the lives of those you love on the line regarding anything medical that’s part of your response to COVID-19.

Your life and theirs’ are far too important for that.

To Download Today’s (Wednesday, June 9, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

Note: On Friday’s “TNN Live” Show, former Senator John Milkovich joins Dan Newman to discuss the Dominion Voting Systems pending agreement with the State of Louisiana to install their complete voting system across the entire state. Join that conversation at 9:00 AM Central by clicking on the banner to the right that says: “Live Now-Click to Listen.”

Thousands of emails of Dr. Anthony Fauci were released to the general public this last week. As one can imagine, they contain numerous examples of Dr. Fauci’s methods of communication with his fellow scientists and the American public. Needless to say, Dr. Fauci has been less than candid with the American people while shoring up his relationship with his Chinese counterpart regarding all things COVID-19. Dr. Fauci has been caught in numerous misrepresentations of many things to do with COVID-19 itself as well as instructing Americans what to do and what NOT to do in their personal handling of the pandemic.

The latest monster issue is somehow to find the source of the virus itself. And the epicenter of focus for that falls directly on the Chinese Communist Party and the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Yet Dr. Fauci has for more than a year demonstrably attacked any who would allege Wuhan as the source. All the while, his emails say otherwise.

So which is correct?

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo confirmed on June 3 that his efforts to get to the bottom of how the virus spread from China to the United States met with sustained opposition within the U.S. government.

Asked about revelations in a June 3 Vanity Fair report that key officials deep within the State Department sought to keep the public from knowing that U.S. funds had supported gain-of-function research at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), Pompeo described a “contentious battle.”

That research, which focused on techniques for reconfiguring naturally occurring viruses to make them more virulent and transmissible to humans, was partially funded as far back as 2012 with U.S. tax dollars through the National Institutes of Health and a nonprofit foundation known as the EcoHealth Alliance.

The Vanity Fair analysis “found that conflicts of interest, stemming in part from large government grants supporting controversial virology research, hampered the U.S. investigation into COVID-19’s origin at every step.”

“In one State Department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say colleagues explicitly told them not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s gain-of-function research because it would bring unwelcome attention to U.S. government funding of it,” the article reads.

China has insisted since the virus first appeared in late 2019 that it had spread from bats to humans via an open-air meat market in Wuhan. However, some government and public health officials, private sector scientists, and investigative journalists have said since early in 2020 that there’s substantial evidence that the virus spread somehow from the WIV.

Then-President Donald Trump and Pompeo and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) publicly noted the existence of such evidence in April 2020. They called on Chinese officials to allow independent investigators to access the WIV and its records. China refused to do so.

After the November 2020 election, Pompeo pushed within the State Department and the Trump administration to release as much evidence as possible. He issued a Jan. 15 statement that includes a significant disclosure that WIV researchers appeared to have suffered virus symptoms months before the disease spread throughout China and other countries, including the United States.

The statement also notes the gain-of-function research at WIV and asks whether U.S. funding may have been diverted to secret Chinese military projects at the WIV.

But even getting that statement out was a struggle, Pompeo said in an interview on June 3.

“I became aware at the end of 2020 that we now had an increased level of confidence in the data points that supported what we put out in the middle of January. So the clock was clearly running, and I was fighting very hard inside the State Department and even more broadly,” he said.

A major roadblock was that significant portions of the evidence were held by intelligence agencies that opposed their public release.

“There were places outside of the State Department that owned the dataset inside the intelligence community, so we were banging away to get them to give us as much space to write as much as we possibly could,” Pompeo said. “We were drafting language that protected classified things that needed to be protected, but we wanted to make sure that we got this information out in the public space.”

The former secretary of state said he viewed it as important at the time and continues today to say that the American people should know all the facts, and the Chinese government should be held accountable if the virus did escape from the WIV.

“There were two reasons for that. One, it was a matter of transparency and, two, we wanted the Chinese Communist Party to have to explain what we knew as well, so we had a very high degree of certainty around what we did,” Pompeo said. “The statement was very carefully crafted, but it is unambiguous about what it said.”

A former senior State Department official with direct knowledge of these matters, who spoke on background, stated that Pompeo made clear to everybody involved in the State Department’s investigation of the source of the virus that they were to pursue facts wherever they led.

When told of internal opposition to the effort, the former senior official said that Pompeo responded with a salty aphorism reflective of his Army career.

“He said, ‘Screw them and tell them the secretary of state said do it.’ And he also said something that’s very, very important. He said: ‘I don’t care what conclusion you guys dig out. It may be something we like to hear, politically or something we don’t like to hear, but I want the truth.’ So that was exactly the attitude throughout the whole investigation this group was doing.”

Summary

Let’s face facts: we are slapped in the face almost daily by Dr. Fauci, giving us information and instructions that we later discover are mostly false and, if not false, extremely misleading. When Americans consider just the possibilities of our actions initiated directly from Fauci’s instructions, the possible results are frightening. And it’s sad to think that any of the more than 500,000 American deaths attributed to COVID-19 could have been prohibited with truthful instructions from Fauci.

Do you know what’s worse than these? Likely, many of those half-million Americans who died would NOT have died if they did nothing but allow their bodies to create antibodies to fight the virus!

But we may never know the correct answer to that either way. And that’s beyond sad; it’s deplorable.

It’s time we close the book on Dr. Anthony Fauci. It’s time this administration instructs the Department of Justice to initiate immediate investigations into the role Fauci appears to have taken in orchestrating this “plandemic.” Americans deserve to know the facts. But, of course, some will say they’d rather not know if facts show the stories they’ve relied on to make medical decisions were deadly to loved ones. Others will say they want to know the truth.

Saddest of all is this: we are actually trying to determine if thousands of Americans lost their lives because of decisions made by “experts” in our government that could even POSSIBLY be true!

Can you believe something like this could ever happen to Americans at the hands of our government?

To Download Today’s (Friday, June 4, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

“Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.”  Former Pfizer VP, Dr. Michael Yeadon

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.”  Dr. James A. Shannon, National Institutes of Health

“The Nuremberg trial of the German war criminals was tacitly based on the recognition of the principle: criminal actions cannot be excused if committed on government orders; conscience supersedes the authority of the law of the state.”  Albert Einstein

“There is no justification for taking away individuals’ freedom in the guise of public safety.” Thomas Jefferson

“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”  Thomas Jefferson

What’s Happening?

I am convinced that our government and its many stakeholders are determined to fulfill the directives of United Nations Agenda 21 in depopulating the world and remaking America into a communist state. Far too many Americans have not just drunk the Kool-Aid, they’ve chugged it to the point of COVID-19 becoming a cult in all its evil glory, with masks, lockdowns, quarantines, and inoculations.  The emergency use COVID-19 “vaccine” is not a vaccine at all, but an experimental unauthorized genetic agent.

The “Plandemic” is connected to early American eugenics, to the Nazi Holocaust against God’s people, to the despotic evil horrors of communism via Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ceaușescu, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, Xi Jinping, and dozens of others influenced by Marx and Engels. Marx and Engels were born in the early 1800s, 1818, and 1820.  Marx died in 1883 and Engels in 1895. They lived to witness the immigration of European communists to the western world and to observe the cataclysmic cancer of their evil godless doctrine permeate governments and academia within the free world.

As I’ve mentioned in several previous articles, historically, vaccines have not actually helped our people.  Yet, our government and its stakeholders have no problem using American citizens as guinea pigs. In fact, in 1912, British sanitation engineer, J.T. Biggs, fought for proper sanitation rather than vaccination. He stated, “The fact that with less vaccination the town enjoyed better health, and the coincident decline of vaccination and smallpox had a great effect on the minds of the people of Leicester.  Not small-pox alone, but the infantile death rate, the whole of the zymotic (infectious) diseases, and the general death rate, all declined in a very marked degree, as vaccination was discarded.”

Deaths and Injuries

Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen J&J are authorized for emergency use only.  None are fully approved or licensed by the FDA.  AstraZeneca has not received emergency use authorization in the U.S. because of problems with blood clots in 18 to 24 nations.  Unlike the mRNA shots, Oxford/AstraZeneca uses double-stranded DNA for the spike protein.

The Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) latest report from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) states that 4,647 people, adults, and children, have been recorded as dying after receiving one of the experimental COVID-19 injections, and 227,805 have been injured.  These figures are from December 20, 2020, to May 17, 2021.  The number of deaths and adverse effects prove these inoculations should have been terminated after 25-50 deaths.

Through April 30, 10,262 so-called breakthrough COVID-19 infections were reported from 46 U.S. states and territories to the CDC in Americans who were vaccinated; 160 of them died of COVID-19 after taking the vaccine. Imagine what it is now with May completed.

The European Medicines Agency, EudraVigilance, is a database reporting suspected adverse drug reaction reports.  Of the four top COVID-19 inoculations, 12,184 Europeans have died, and there have been 1,196,190 adverse effects as of May 22, 2021.  During an interview, Dr. Peter McCullough told journalist Alex Newman, “These figures would have merited an investigation by federal health authorities.”

COVID-19 “Vaccine” Shedding

Senior editor of the New American Magazine, journalist Alex Newman, has interviewed Dr. Lee Merritt several times.  She is a member of “America’s Frontline Doctors” and was the past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.  Her recent interview with Alex Newman was spellbinding. Is the COVID-19 vaccine shedding hurting the unvaxed?  It would seem so.

Rumble video: https://rumble.com/vh8swd-lee-merrit-interview.html

The unusual side effects of these inoculations are not being exposed and Big Pharma now wants to inoculate youngsters aged 12 to 18 who are not at serious risk from COVIDD-19.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Meryl Nass, on behalf of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), filed a Citizen Petition with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking the agency to immediately revoke the Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for COVID-19 vaccines and to refrain from licensing them. Why is there no isolate of the virus; why can’t the CDC give an isolate? This is a huge controversy. A lab worker from California said they tested all these samples coming from people either infected with COVID-19 or dying of it and he said they couldn’t find anything other than influenza A and B.  Dr. Merritt comments that “perhaps there never was a viral outbreak, that it was a bioweapon release of a spike protein subunit of the spike protein that could be passed on tactilely and spread in an area, maybe aerosolized; think Wuhan, Lombardi, and New York City.”

Merritt continued: “We saw a standard flu season curve; everything was going down until they started the inoculation program.  With the injection, they’re literally giving you the material to build the spike protein in your body in all cells.  It goes throughout your body and produces the actual pathogen in your system. And then, it apparently can potentially shed.”

Dr. Merritt said she checked VAERS and there were 160 cases of this rare disorder thrombocytopenia, a condition in which you have a low blood platelet count. Platelets (thrombocytes) are colorless blood cells that help blood clot. Platelets stop bleeding by clumping and forming plugs in blood vessel injuries.  However, she explained that this is killing COVID-19 “vaxed” people in spite of aggressive medical treatment, which generally doesn’t happen.

A mother took her second vaccine and was breastfeeding her one-month-old baby, and the baby died of thrombocytopenia.  Dr. Merritt said, “That alone should have caused a stoppage in this.” She explained how they vaccinated a number of mice in Australia to contain the small mammal population. Through touch, secretions, and breast milk, a second pass was made to the unvaccinated mice until it wore out down the line.  Dr. Merritt says she personally believes this COVID-19 injection is programmed to do this.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former chief science officer of Pfizer said, “Just look out your window and ask yourself why your government is lying to you about even simple things.”  He said the answer is, “They’re trying to kill you and your children.”

Dr. Merritt talked about the “long sad history of trying to get vaccines to depopulate certain populations.”  Unvaccinated women seem especially targeted with bleeding, including female children through post-menopausal women while in contact with COVID-19 “vaccinated” persons.  Dr. Merritt says that vaccine makers are looking at women’s ovaries to see what happens. She believes they know a lot more than they’re telling us.

Alex Newman commented that the New American Magazine reported on the sterilization of millions of Kenyan women via a tetanus vaccine.  Less than a year after the United Nations unveiled a sweeping population-control plot aimed at reducing the number of people in Kenya, a supposed UN “vaccine program” was under fire by doctors and Catholic bishops for deliberately sterilizing millions of women. Incredibly, it is not the first time that international vaccine campaigns by the UN targeting Third World populations have been exposed as covert sterilization and eugenics programs. Some critics have even referred to the latest plot as race-based genocide. The tetanus vaccines were administered in Kenya by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF).

Nuremberg Codes

The Nuremberg Codes are supposed to protect us from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation prisoners suffered at concentration camps, but like so many other laws, the Codes are being ignored by those who wish to attain the ultimate in control.

The question remains, “Are the biopharmaceutical companies conducting ethical clinical trials with their COVID-19 injections?”  The Codes state that any scientist in charge must be willing to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur.  But that is not happening with the COVID-19 injections; nothing has been terminated despite massive reports of deaths, adverse effects, and requests.

The Nuremberg trials marked the first prosecutions for crimes against humanity with simultaneous translation available to people from several countries during the trials.  Four judges were chosen with alternates from the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union.  The Trials served as a precedent for the subsequent prosecution of war crimes and led to the establishment of the United Nations Genocide Convention and Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 as well as the Geneva Convention on the Laws and Customs of War in 1949.

The United Nations has never been on the side of freedom and liberty. Their goals are anathema to the U.S. Constitution and to worldwide human freedom and peace.

Enemies of freedom have never followed the rules for war.

From 1945 to 1946, Nazi Germany leaders stood trial for crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes.  Japanese war crime trials were started on May 3rd, 1946, and ended on November 4, 1948, with 25 of 28 Japanese defendants being found guilty.  Japanese — yes, think of Iwo Jima and the Bataan March.  The Japanese were accused of conducting a series of human rights abuses against civilians and prisoners of war throughout East Asia and the western Pacific region. These events reached their height during the Second Sino-Japanese War of 1937–45 and the Asian and Pacific campaigns of World War II (1941–45).

A large team of more than 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 medical experts, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, has initiated legal proceedings against the CDC, WHO, and the Davos Group for crimes against humanity.

United Nations

Foisted on Americans after WWII by the Deep State was the idea for the United Nations. The United States enlisted as a founding member of the UN when the U.S. Senate approved the UN Charter on July 28, 1945. After only six days of formal deliberation, the Senate voted 89 to 2 in favor of joining the world body. The two patriots who voted against ratifying the Charter and UN membership were Senators Henrik Shipstead (R-MN) and William Langer (R-ND). Democrat President Harry Truman signed the United Nations Charter and the United States became the first nation to complete the ratification process and join the new international organization.

President Emeritus of the John Birch Society, Jack McManus stated what happened back then. In 1945, there were several senators who saw possible danger in getting into the UN. But most used the excuse, “Let’s give it a try and we’ll pull out later if it isn’t a good place for the U.S. to be.”  One was Ohio’s, Robert Taft.  It took him only a couple of years to announce, “The UN is a trap. Let’s go it alone.”  He then led the opposition to start NATO in 1949 but lost that vote in the Senate when there were only 13 Nay votes.  The argument used in 1945 to approve membership in the UN went like this, “We had WWI and WWII and we don’t want a WWIII. So, let’s give this new idea called the UN a try.”

Never a senator, J. Reuben Clark was a veteran State Department functionary.  His very strong condemnation of the proposed UN in 1945 was terrific.  He obviously had read the Charter — a fairly short document about the size of the U.S. Constitution.  Clark is highly regarded by patriotic Mormons — he’s was LDS himself (now deceased). As John McManus rightly states, “We must withdraw.”

The UN was plotted and planned long before 1945.  One need only purchase a copy of the 1933 book or movie with Walter Huston entitled, Gabriel Over the White House.

The U.S. Constitution creates a government with strictly limited and defined powers, whereas the UN Charter establishes the framework for expansive global governance towards one-world government.

The Rockefellers and the United Nations were joined together at the hip. The COVID-19 “Plandemic” was predicted over a decade ago by the Rockefeller Foundation. Their intention was clear: to use the opportunity of the scenario or crisis to shape a “better future” or transform the world into their likeness — a New World Order global totalitarian dictatorship. The “Lock Step” scenario is described as “a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” and is based on a pandemic of a virus (an influenza strain) that infects nearly 20% of the world population and kills 8 million people in 7 months.

Trygve Lie, Secretary-General of the United Nations, received from John D. Rockefeller III, on behalf of his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., a check for $8,500,000 for the purchase of the 6-block Manhattan East River site where the United Nations built its permanent Headquarters.  Passing through the gates of the building means entering the international territory. This 18-acre site does not belong to just one country, but to all 193 Member States that have joined the Organization.  And it is on American soil. How many have wished the building would fall into the Hudson River!

Their “UN Agenda 21” fits perfectly into depopulation via the Covid inoculations.

Reality

I believe COVID-19 was planned and executed for several reasons, and the mRNA inoculations are a form of depopulation.  Some will die from the experimental injections, but far more may die in time when new viruses are released, and renowned virologists, have stated that via the injections, the COVID-19 variants are becoming more virulent.

Whether or not it’s true, the fact remains that in COVID-19 “vaccine” animal studies, when a new virus was introduced after mRNA injections, the animals all died of sepsis or heart failure.  “When,” not “If,” a new bioweapon viral infection hits our shores to depopulate us, (UN Agenda 21), those who have been injected with the mRNA inoculations will probably react like the animals. However, the government and media story will be that it had nothing to do with their emergency use “COVID-19 vaccines,” and that everyone must have another “vaccine” because the new virus is even more deadly than COVID-19. Plan completed and more will die.

Conclusion

Not only is the State of New York working with IBM working with NY Governor Cuomo for COVID-19 passports, now the Fascist State of Oregon has become the first state to mandate vaccination in order to be able to take your face mask off when entering businesses, churches, government buildings, etc. This is the resurrection of Jim Crow laws but based on a vaccine instead of skin color.

In North Carolina, adolescents who are 12 and up can provide their own consent if deemed able to understand and make decisions about their health. A representative of the state’s heavyweight health group UNC Health stated, “COVID-19 vaccination is one of those medical treatments that North Carolina says that a child is able to consent for on their own.”

Three other states  — Alabama, Oregon, and Tennessee — are permitting adolescents 14 or 15 years of age and older to do the same, and Iowa is leaving consent requirements to the discretion of “each individual healthcare provider/health system.”

Americans have become soft: life has been good since WWII.  The majority of our citizenry didn’t notice the slithering snakes of communism over the last 180 years.  There were no long lines, no shortages, but then came fear, sold to us by the enemies of freedom.  The public complied, they locked down, wore their masks, quarantined, lost their businesses, saw communists destroy cities and businesses, with nary a complaint. Suicide, drugs, alcohol, and domestic abuse rose exponentially.  The cost of the shutdown was worse than the government lies about COVID-19.

The lie of COVID-19 and fear of death had overtaken the country.  Americans line up for the inoculation out of fear, never understanding that 99.75% of Americans recover from the virus.

The South saw it, they fought to keep the right of secession, but the juggernaut of a large centralized government prevailed and destroyed the core of the Republic and her Constitution.

To Download Today’s (Tuesday, June 1, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link: