We are receiving COVID-19 information in floods every day! It’s uncanny. It appears that some U.S. government officials and the Mainstream Media have purposely protected the release of anything that might be perceived when released as bad news. This material includes mounds of information that scientists from numerous specialties have found regarding pretty much every aspect of COVID-19.
These “discoveries” come from all across the “COVID-19 Board:” everything from its source (or sources), its scientific and biologic makeup, whether it appeared naturally or was manipulated, its symptoms, its treatment(s), how to control its spread, medications that are safe and/or dangerous, and just how deadly it is.
“Wait a minute,” you say; “Dr. Anthony Fauci has led the charge to unearth ALL of this information. He’s the most knowledgeable person there is on infectious diseases. He has ALL the facts!”
Yes, we all believed this to be true. But, sadly, news that debunks these so-called “attributes” of Dr. Fauci and some other “experts” is also flooding the news just as rapidly daily. More and more facts prove that Dr. Fauci has been anything but forthright with us about all things COVID-19. In fact, there is even a possibility of Dr. Fauci being in criminal jeopardy for his actions in this regard.
To this end, TruthNewsNetwork is committed to daily (as these releases occur) bring to our TNN family ALL the information as quickly as we receive it and verify its validity. So yes, there is a plethora of COVID-19 information and news almost daily. And it’s critical to all to have access to it to make decisions for yourself and your families.
We begin this process that will be ongoing with today’s COVID-19 information we have unearthed during the past three days. This has ALL been documented and verified as accurate. In fact, some hyperlinks provided will take you to the sources.
Let’s get started!
COVID Deaths Among Fully Vaccinated Patients Triple
Over the past month, deaths and hospitalizations from infection with COVID-19 have tripled in the United States among those fully vaccinated.
According to a data report released in late May by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), between January 1 and April 30, 2021, there were a total of 10,262 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines “breakthrough infections,” defined as coronavirus infections in fully vaccinated persons, from 46 U.S. states and territories.
Approximately 10% (995) of the patients infected after vaccination before April 30 were hospitalized. The agency also reported that it had received reports of 160 fully vaccinated patients who died from complications with the infection.
Just days after the above report, the CDC website reported that 3,016 fully vaccinated patients with the COVID-19 vaccine had developed a “breakthrough infection” and had been hospitalized or died during May. COVID deaths of vaccinated patients totaled 535 as of June 1 compared with 160 deaths reported a month earlier.
Without explaining their decision, the CDC reported that as of May 1, it would only be counting cases and infections of the CCP Virus in vaccinated patients who end up hospitalized or die, discounting the nearly 90% of cases that are not hospitalized and do not die but do report vaccine failure. The controversial move clarifies a major gap in data collection on vaccine efficacy, so future reported numbers will be completely skewed.
In addition, since 27% of reported cases are asymptomatic, there also remains a large portion of vaccinated persons who are asymptomatic and could be spreading the disease.
Following this same policy, the agency also does not count as “breakthrough infection” cases, i.e., infected persons already vaccinated, who received only one dose of the vaccines that recommend at least two doses. This is even though one dose is supposed to generate a large percentage of protection against the virus.
A large number of deaths of vaccinated people raises the question of whether the deaths are really due to having contracted the virus or whether they were caused by some adverse effect resulting from the vaccine, which is still in the process of being tested.
The possible side effect that could cause the death of a vaccinated patient is known as “ADE” (antibody overreaction), basically, a hyperimmune response that triggers dangerous inflammatory processes of the disease, which basically and ironically generates the worst outcome of the disease among those who have been vaccinated.
These reactions have been seen before with other experimental vaccines; such is the case of 130 children who lost their lives in the Philippines in 2017 after receiving an experimental dengue vaccine, as reported by the journal Science.
This type of analysis on factual and publicly available data is usually not published by the hegemonic media, who promote along with the government the massive vaccination plans without warning of the existing risks.
However, a large sector of the population continues to be reluctant to receive any of the experimental vaccines currently in circulation, which creates a major problem for the Biden administration’s stated goals of achieving a supposed vaccine-produced immunity against the CCP Virus.
China Applied For Patent On Its CCP Virus Vaccine Before Pandemic Declared
Investigations into the now not-so-mysterious origin of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Virus reveal that a renowned Chinese scientist who worked at U.S. universities applied for a patent for the vaccine just five weeks after the regime declared human-to-human transmission.
Yusen Zhou is registered as the lead inventor of the vaccine in the patent on behalf of the “Institute of Military Medicine, PLA Academy of Military Science,” which serves the CCP, The Australian reported on June 4.
Zhou died mysteriously only a few months later, aged 54. Despite having had a brilliant career and being decorated for his military services, he received no official recognition. Only a brief notification in a newspaper reported his death.
Meanwhile, Nikolai Petrovsky, a medical researcher at Flinders University in Australia who worked on creating a vaccine against the CCP Virus, said it was a “remarkable achievement” to develop it in such a short time as Zhou and his team did.
Given this “achievement,” he did not rule out the possibility that they were working on it earlier.
“This is something we have never seen achieved before, which raises the question of whether this work may have started much earlier,” Petrovsky commented.
The complex plot of the origin of the virus involves senior U.S. officials, who tried to deflect attention away from the Wuhan Virology Laboratory in Wuhan, China, raising suspicions that they may have wanted to shirk their possible responsibility.
“They were reluctant to give credence to the theory that COVID-19 (CCP Virus) might be the result of a lab leak, fearing that it would expose their complicity in providing funding to a facility that intelligence agencies suspected might have triggered the pandemic,” according to writer and researcher Sharri Markson.
Markson is preparing a book, “What Really Happened In Wuhan.” She also reported on CCP projects on biological weapons for an eventual World War III years earlier.
“Chinese military scientists talked about weaponizing SARS coronaviruses five years before the COVID-19 pandemic in a paper that also predicted that a third world war would be fought with biological weapons,” she wrote in one of her tweets.
Japan Times reported, “The U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, had since 2014 funded dangerous laboratory research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to redesign bat coronaviruses and make them more infectious for experimental purposes.”
In this context, President Joe Biden did not follow the project initiated by Former President Trump to restructure the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO is seriously implicated in the disastrous spread of the virus worldwide. Nevertheless, Biden reinstated the WHO on his first day as President.
Moreover, he signed on Jan. 26 an executive order directed at federal agencies, calling any reference to the pandemic racist if the “geographic location of its origin” was mentioned. Finally, he roadblocked any possibility of holding the CCP responsible for the deaths and damage caused by the virus, as many lawmakers have proposed.
Thus: “Biden was making it official U.S. policy to disassociate the virus from its source of origin—China. However, it is still considered correct to refer to variants of the virus by their geographical origin,” argues author Brahma Chellaney.
COVID-19 Must Be Artificial Based On Its “Rare” Genome
COVID-19 as a reprisal from nature on humans was impossible, according to two American experts on Sunday, who said that its rare genome combination could not be found naturally on any coronavirus.
Dr. Steven Quay and Richard Muller said that “damning science” suggests COVID-19 is a product of a souped-up virus experiment. The virus was deliberately modified to reach utmost infectious capacity, in an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal Sunday, June 6.
“The most compelling reason to favor the lab leak hypothesis is firmly based in science,” the experts wrote, who pointed to the virus’ rare genome, which proves that it was incubated in a laboratory environment.
Among the 36 sequencing patterns, the SARS-CoV-2 demonstrated the sequencing combination called “CGG-CGG,” or “double CGG,” which the men said has “never been found naturally.”
If the virus were to have evolved naturally, it must adapt to infect the human body through a sequence from cousin viruses that foster the ability, such as SARS or MERS, which are natural respiratory diseases issued from coronavirus. However, both the SARS and MERS do not have double CGG in their genome.
Since scientists have never found double CGG in a natural environment, the only explanation is that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered.
“A virus simply cannot pick up a sequence from another virus if that sequence isn’t present in any other virus,” the experts noted.
Talking of the possibility that such an event may still occur naturally, the experts argued: “why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG.”
“Yes, it could have happened randomly, through mutations. But do you believe that? At the minimum, this fact—that the coronavirus, with all its random possibilities, took the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers—implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be laboratory escape,” they sternly stated.
Meanwhile, in gain-of-function research, such combination was, in fact, one of the preferable methods that microbiologists employ to make a virus more infectious or more lethal.
“That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it,” the two men said, adding that the sequence was the superior choice over the other 35 patterns because “it creates a useful beacon that permits the scientists to track the insertion in the laboratory.”
The experts questioned the chance of SARS-CoV-2 learning how to infect humans outside of laboratory intervention.
“Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?”
We cannot sit by idly waiting for facts to be spoon-fed to us to enhance some partisan narrative. Every American is being forced to make life-and-death decisions almost daily regarding everything wrapped in COVID-19 information that, in many cases, has been only leaked in timing politically beneficial to those monetizing COVID-19. Yes, I said “monetizing.” Many so-called experts have found ways to turn the mysteries of COVID into financial windfalls. And this travesty puts the lives of Americans in danger daily.
We’re not name-calling; we’re just doing what we do as journalists: researching, discovering, verifying, and bring facts to Americans. That’s one fundamental that is NOT for sale.
If you have questions about any of this, I say, “Good for you.” Question everything! But don’t stop there. Get on your horse to do research and confirm the validity of what you’ve heard compared to what we present.
Find the truth. Make your decisions based on facts and not emotions. And, most importantly, never put your life or the lives of those you love on the line regarding anything medical that’s part of your response to COVID-19.
Your life and theirs’ are far too important for that.