Innumerable Election Fraud Cases Dismissed for ‘Lack of Evidence’

Here are a few headlines on the first page of a Google search that states this: “How many 2020 election fraud cases have seen the evidence presented in court before being dismissed?”

Election 2020: A look at Trump campaign election lawsuits …
Trump’s Strategy To Contest Election Hinges On Claims Of …
Trump And The GOP Have Now Lost More Than 50 Post …
Trump loses 3 cases challenging ballots after dropping …
Georgia rebuts Trump’s voter fraud claims in court…
Trump rails at judges as another court rejects his lawyers’ claims…
Lawsuits pile up as Trump campaign alleges voter fraud in at …
Lawsuit tracker: Donald Trump’s legal battle runs into …
Challenging Trump in Court and Protecting the Black … – NAACP
Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States …

These searches came on Google. Note: Not a single search references anything similar to what the search instructions asked: “How many 2020 election fraud cases have seen the evidence presented in court before being dismissed?”

Why would that happen? Answer: in fewer than a handful of the 50+ cases filed in state district and state supreme courts, and even the U.S. Supreme Court, did the courts actually allow evidence to be presented by the plaintiffs to show their justification for filing these claims!

Most were not even lawsuits as the mainstream media pounded into their audiences’ heads again and again. They were mostly motions asking for a chance to “show cause” in an “evidentiary hearing.” Yet Democrats and their media mouthpieces incessantly beat the drum of “No proof of voter fraud of any kind was proven by the Trump team — none at all!”

That’s a great talking point, but a somber one. It speaks to the suspicions long held by many true conservatives that the Rule of Law as detailed in the U.S. Constitution has been (and still is) being deleted as “The” framework of the U.S. legal system. Law enforcement officials have been told from the top down, “we no longer will enforce certain laws.”

We’ve watched it happen again and again. Barack Obama’s self-proclaimed “Wingman,” Attorney General Eric Holder received orders from the White House to stop prosecuting drug offenders for drug offenses other than trafficking.

“Wait a minute: aren’t there federal drug laws on the books that define in detail the types of drug infractions that are illegal, describes which level of crime each falls under, and what are the penalties for each?” There certainly are such laws. In fact, there are hundreds of federal laws that encompass every part of illegal drug possession, personal use, the sale of drugs, and even drug trafficking. Included in each are the mandated penalties for conviction of a violation of any of these laws. But Barack Obama skipped Congress — which is unconstitutional when it comes to laws passed by Congress — and many law enforcement officials now at the federal, state, and local levels have taken that lead. The latest is the “new” District Attorney of Los Angeles County. (We’ll bring that entire story to you at a later date)

2020 Election Fraud Exposes Underbelly of Lawfirms

Who would have thought that a sitting President would have difficulty finding lawyers to represent him in taking on the obvious election fraud of 2020? Donald Trump is probably the first president to face such difficulty. A Senate hearing was recently held in which a Trump attorney discussed exactly how evil is the legal system when it comes to defending a conservative like Donald Trump:

Attorney Troupis exposed exactly what has happened in the aftermath of the November 3rd “steal” from the Rule of Law. Knowing what Mr. Troupis said in his Senate testimony about the Wisconsin recount, how could anyone expect fair treatment by any court in this country regarding this election?

There today are hundreds of affidavits sworn under the threat of perjury presenting specific facts, pictures, and documents that show massive examples of rampant voter fraud in November. Americans have watched in horror in the 60-days since video evidence, audio testimony, and hundreds of news stories have evidenced the fraud. But none of that matters when courts refuse to consider the evidence in court. That’s what the law demands and provides. Sadly, the Leftists who orchestrated this Steal knew full well that partisan judges at local and state levels — including state Supreme Courts — could refuse to allow evidentiary hearings or presentation of this evidence in court and hijack the Rule of Law.

Why would these local, state, and state supreme court judges shortchange President Trump? It’s simple: none of them are “judges.” They are each ELECTED to their positions!

Uh-Oh. You now know where this is going.

Money, Money, Money

The Center for Tech and Civic Life gave grants to more than 2,500 jurisdictions this year to help departments pay for election administration. The money arrived as historically underfunded election department budgets were sapped from unforeseen purchases during the primaries and were forced to spend money on election workers, postage, and printing for the increasing number of voters who wanted to vote by mail. The nonprofit gave Chester County $2.5 million for the election, which is more than the county’s 2020 budget for voting services.

Chester County is one of several large suburban counties that ring Philadelphia — once-Republican strongholds that have shifted in Democrats’ favor in recent years. Pennsylvania was pivotal to Joe Biden’s victory over President Trump, and his win in the state was fueled in part by his success in Chester County. He won it by 17 percentage points — nearly double Hillary Clinton’s margin four years earlier.

With a tight budget and little help from the federal government, Chester County applied for an election grant from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a previously small Chicago-based nonprofit that quickly amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in donations to help local election offices — most notably, $350 million from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan.

“Honestly, I don’t know what we would have done without it,” Turner said.

Many applaud the Zuckerbergs for their magnanimous gifts to those Pennsylvania election offices before the 2020 election. You probably will not be surprised to know that the Zuckerbergs and several dozens of OTHER billionaires decided to start this process in states that need financial assistance in their local election offices, especially in smaller districts around Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia.

“If it quacks and waddles, it’s almost always a duck!”

We’re not saying that all these Trump Campaign lawsuits that were never allowed to present evidence in these swing states were because of political corruption based on money from political supporters. But it seems odd that in such a critical election in our nation’s history that so many similar variances happened across the country, all for the very first time. And while those were happening, that would surely initiate court actions post-election because the very obvious election irregularities were almost all met with total resistance by the courts in each of these states.

“If it quacks and waddles, it’s almost always a duck!”

Americans are tired of that duck showing up!

Is This All Just Another Conspiracy Theory?

I wondered about that myself. Then I started thinking through all the moving parts that would have to fall in place for this to happen. There is NO logical way to conclude that somehow everything happened just as it happened without a huge operation that surely had to be structured, planned, organized, and implemented. But, what plan and who coordinated and implemented the plan? Could massive campaign contributions from Leftist billionaires for state election campaigns for local and state election employees be the key to coordinate this very obvious interruption of the legal process to question in court election fraud?

And then “Mr. Bean” stepped in with a possibility that seems plausible.

British actor Rowan Atkinson, world-famous for his role as “Mr. Bean,” railed against cancel culture this week, calling it the 21st-century digital equivalent of a revolutionary mob out on a witch hunt. “The problem we have online is that an algorithm decides what we want to see, which ends up creating a simplistic, binary view of society,” Atkinson said in an interview. “It becomes a case of either you’re with us or against us. And if you’re against us, you deserve to be ‘canceled.’”

So the Hollywood Left, Big Tech, professional sports activists, rap stars, Mainstream Media television stars, and major newspaper writers have created an environment on a national level that holds power to dictate actions allowed and those not allowed on the part of public servants!

I guess the story that Attorney Troupis gave before that Senate Committee you heard above really confirms this legal “Cancel Culture” theory more than likely did the job! No attorneys wanted to represent the President in court. No state judge wanted to be guilty of going against the Cancel Culture “gods” by allowing evidence of election fraud to come into their court’s records because they did NOT want to be disenfranchised from their professional lives. And, sadly, those elitists really do have the power to do just that!

Summary

As of this story’s writing late Tuesday night in Louisiana, the two Georgia U.S. Senate runoff elections are virtually tied with 76% of the votes in. It’s only 9:00 PM Central. It’s early. I can see a scenario in which “It’s late. We have hundreds of thousands of votes left to count. The turnout was monstrous! We want to make certain — especially with the uproar that occurred November 3rd — that we get EVERY vote cast counted and that we are certain no illegal votes are included in our count. We’re going to call it a night, get back together at 7:00 AM Georgia time tomorrow morning, and pick it up to hopefully get voters “verified” results by late afternoon on Wednesday.”

For some time, I have been expecting something like that water pipe break in Atlanta that never broke but was effective to shutdown Fulton County’s counting process late in the evening November 3rd to happen during the runoff counting.

“You don’t think they’ll really try to cheat to win those two Senate seats, do you?”

Reportedly, 6000 GOP poll workers enrolled to watch at polls during voting and the counting process. And since these two runoff races are so close, the Cancel Culture minions managing the counting process would need some excuse to empty those rooms of poll watchers. They’ve got to have a break to get those suitcases with mail-in ballots out to get them counted!


One thought on “Innumerable Election Fraud Cases Dismissed for ‘Lack of Evidence’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.