They Both Gave Speeches: Was One Racist?

I’m growing tired of the incessant use of the words “racist” and “racism.” They are thrown about so often that the true meanings have been lost to most of us. We’ve grown mind-numbed or just tune-out when people throw them into the air.

What’s worse is that politicians — specifically ONE group of politicians — have chosen to take ownership of the use of the words: the Democrat Party. There’s much U.S. history to confirm that. But much of it has been stealthily removed from American history books by leftist educators and politicians over the last 50-60 years. After all, a political party that claims to be the sole supporters of people of color cannot be known as a bunch of racists who do little but spread their racism to all who dare listen.

You can always tell when someone has a guilty conscience or feel guilty of doing something wrong. Typically they gravitate toward behaviors that would remove any attention away from them and direct it elsewhere. Only one political party in the United States has a history of racism, and that’s the Democratic Party. Republicans were the party of Lincoln, Reconstruction, anti-lynching laws, and the Civil Rights Acts of 1875, 1957, 1960, and 1964. So what is the Democratic Party guilty of?  They are the party that has always been aligned with the KKK, Jim Crow Laws, and Margaret Sanger, to name a few.

One can only imagine the guilt Democrats must carry decade after decade due to the shameful yet well-disguised racism they pretend to despise.  Democrats have erased people like Josiah Walls, Hiram Rhodes Revel, and Joseph Hayne Rainey from history books a long time ago. Removing their past has been an ongoing process over the years. The Democrats, not Republicans, try to entice people of color with duplicitous incentives and false narratives. It is the Democrats who overwhelmingly try to convince the black community they are the saviors of civil liberties in this country.

The Democrat Party has always been pro-slavery. In the late 1850s, the Republican Party came into being a response and opposition to the Democrat Party. The first seven African Americans elected to office happened between 1865 and 1877, and they were all Republicans. Most black Americans were Republicans at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century.

By the mid-1860s, the Republican Party, which was aligned with African Americans, put quite a strain on Democrats, resulting in the Democrat Party’s creation of the KKK. The relationship between the two groups, the KKK and Democrat Party, was confirmed during the 1868 Democrat National Convention when General Nathan Bedford Forrest, a former Civil war general, was made the first Grand Wizard of the KKK.  The KKK was part of the Confederate Democrat Party from 1865 to Reagan, and the ideals of structural racism remained until and beyond Bill Clinton. It was the Democrat Party and its leaders who created structural racism to maintain political power.

Despite their attempts to remove history from their timeline, it is still well documented in a thirteen-volume set of Congressional investigations beginning 1872.  “The official documents, titled Report of the Joint Select Committee to Inquire Into the Condition of Affairs in the Late Insurrectionary States, irrefutably proves the KKK’s prominent role in the Democrat Party.”

Jim Crow Laws were another way to control and promote racism in the United States by the Democrat Party. They were intended to oppress anyone of color, including Sicilians, spread segregation, and prevent individuals from getting jobs. “The Democrats of the recent past wrote laws which segregated public schools, restaurants, transportation, restrooms, and public places in general (everything from water machines to public beaches).”  Citation USA Today Network  Many of the monuments depict Confederate Democrat Party Leaders of the past.

Margaret Sanger was the founder of Planned Parenthood and a Democrat.  Sanger and her beliefs have been idolized by Democrats for decades and still are today.  In 2009 Hillary Clinton won the Planned Parenthood award where she said: “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously — her courage, her tenacity, her vision.  And when I think about what she did all those years ago in Brooklyn, taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions, I am really in awe of her.”

So, who is Margaret Sanger, and what were her beliefs?

Sanger founded Planned Parenthood, The Birth Control Review, and she embraced eugenics. “Eugenics encouraged people of so-called healthy, superior stock to reproduce and discouraged reproduction of the mentally challenged or anyone who fell outside the social norm. Eugenics was popular in America during much of the first half of the twentieth century. Yet, it earned its negative association mainly from Adolf Hitler’s obsessive attempts to create a superior Aryan race.”[1]  Supporters of Eugenics include Francis Galton, Adolph Hitler, and Josef Mengele.

Sanger was also one of the founding Foremothers of the Progressive Movement. Some of her beliefs and teachings included:

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” [2]

“We want a world freer, happier, cleaner; we want a race of thoroughbreds.” [3]

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” [4]

Planned Parenthood is the largest provider of abortions nationwide.  They have done a great job in creating the illusion that they benefit anyone of color. Seventy-nine percent of Planned Parenthood abortion facilities are located within walking distance of Latina or Black communities. Tracking the abortion industry clearly shows that they target women of color. They use tactics that include career and education as being more important over the lives of their babies. Planned Parenthood has consistently refused to publish data on the proportion of abortions and sterilization of minorities worldwide.

“Between 2007 and 2010, nearly 36 percent of all abortions in the United States were performed on black children, even though black Americans make up only 13 percent of our population. A further 21 percent of abortions were performed on Hispanics, and 7 percent more on other minority groups, for a total of 64 percent of U.S. abortions tragically performed on minority groups” [5]

“Many legislators benefit from Planned Parenthood’s generosity. “Recently, several Democrat U.S. senators incredibly cited race when opposing a bill requiring medical aid for babies born alive after a botched abortion. One stated that black babies are three times more likely to die in their first year, which is an odd reason to withhold care from them. Another Senator cited racial disparities in the healthcare industry to justify not giving lifesaving aid to already-born infants. A third Democrat Senator cited abortion as a means of lowering the 700 maternal mortality cases each year in the United States.” [6]

Today, 500,000 unborn black babies die a year. The most dangerous place for a black child today is in the womb of its own mother. The Child has a 50% chance of living or dying.[7]


Wednesday evening, racism among politicians was on full display in the Capitol as President Biden gave his first presidential address to Congress. As Democrats now do in unison, he painted a picture of the nation as one which shelters racists and promotes racism. He used it as a tool against any that disagree with his statements. But he and other Democrats don’t stop there. Simply disagreeing with Democrat Party leaders about racism means you’re a racist! The President of the United States actually made a case for that without even intimating that allegation was his personal “opinion.” It is most likely that President Biden doesn’t think that claim is simply an opinion. That makes the problem of race in the nation that much more stark and ugly.

What sadly drove those points home was the response speech from the GOP that was given by African American Senator Tim Scott (R-SC). Senator Scott detailed the true racism he and others in his family through multiple generations in the South have experienced. No doubt it was real. No doubt it was egregious with nasty results. But Senator Scott did not, in his life, accept the Democrat Party mantra that ALL whites are racist, that ALL conservatives in the nation espouse racism simply because they are white, and that he and millions of other black Americans have believed in our structure, our laws, our institutions, and the American people and have refused to drive Americans apart by using shouts of racism against others.

Tim Scott ended his speech by pushing back on President Biden’s claim that the United States is systemically racist. Scott loudly proclaimed, “The United States is NOT a racist country!”

I’ll close with this observation:

There certainly is MUCH racism in our country. And it was on full display following the President’s speech and Tim Scott’s response. Racism was blatantly obvious in the responses to Senator Scott’s speech and its contents.

  • On MSNBC, political commentator Joy Ann-Reid expressed disappointment in Scott’s speech noting he failed to speak about his work on the George Floyd Act and called his speech “standard Republican pabulum,” which could have been delivered by Sens. Tom Cotton or Mike Lee.
  • On CNN, commentator Van Jones expressed dismay about Scott’s speech and said he lost many African-Americans “by the tens of millions” when he said that America was not racist.
  • Responding to Scott’s speech on ABC’s Good Morning America on Thursday, Vice President Kamala Harris said she doesn’t believe America is a racist country. Still, she noted: “we also do have to speak the truth about racism in this country, and its existence today.”
  • American civil rights leader and political activist Rev. Jesse Jackson criticized the Republican party after Scott’s rebuttal speech, tweeting: ”The R[epublican]s putting Scott behind Biden tonight was disgraceful & embarrassing. R[epublican]s applaud Scott & boo Colin Powell. It’s the cruelest manipulation of a politician I’ve seen. Scott’s logic was weak & sick. Again, R[epublican]s try to make Clarence Thomas & Thurgood Marshall interchangeable.”
  • MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow started by saying, “it’s going to be hard for most people that are paying any attention to politics to swallow the ‘Republicans support making it easier to vote’ line. There’s some stuff there that may make sense in a sliver of Republican world, but in the news world, I don’t think will ring.”
  • MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace agreed and said, “This is a speech delivered from a planet where facts don’t matter, which is where the current Republican party resides, so it’s not really his fault. But it is his responsibility to get his facts straight. The most reprehensible thing he said was his remarks about the Georgia voting law.”
  • Lawrence O’Donnell even took issue with Scott saying, “Our president seems like a good man. He (Scott) couldn’t bring himself to say to Republican voters who he wants to raise money from ‘our president is a good man. If you asked Joe Biden about Tim Scott, there’s no circumstance in which Joe Biden wouldn’t say, ‘Tim Scott’s a good man, and then he’d go onto talk about his disagreements.”

It’s from their own mouths, and it’s from a mixed batch: straight, gay, black, white, male, and female. Listening to them after listening to President Biden and Tim Scott proved something to me: there’s plenty of racism in the nation to go around. It also proves that an elite class of wannabe “experts” has marshaled the “permission and authority” to be THE arbiters of who is and who isn’t racist.

Do you know what’s oddest about their doing that? It shows that even Democrat sycophants can be — and many are — Racists!




[2] Margaret Sanger (18791966). Woman and the New Race.1920.

[3] 1926 edition of the newspaper for Reading, Pennsylvania (The Reading News-Times).

[4] Margaret Sanger commenting on the Negro Project in a letter to Clarence Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939.

[5] The Centers for Disease Control and Preventions Abortion Surveillance Report.


[7] Stolen History: Revealing the Truth to Unite America


To Download Today’s (Friday, April 30, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

Joe Biden’s $1.8 Trillion “New” Plan We Cannot Afford

Here we are again, bringing you a “new” Biden spending plan. It seems like we’re doing that every two weeks or so. In fact, I’m certain there have been at least six or seven such plans from Democrat leaders in Congress, along with those that “supposedly” are inked at the White House. As usual, this new one is a doozy. Let’s take a look at its details and how much it will cost Americans: Oh, not you and me. It won’t cost us anything because there’s no way we Baby Boomers could pay for this and all the other ones, even if we paid EVERY dime of our personal incomes to the federal government! But that’s a story for another day.

The American Families Plan

President Biden on Wednesday outlined the American Families Plan, an ambitious package that calls for $1 trillion in new spending and $800 billion in new tax credits and aims to significantly expand access to preschool and community college, as well as child care and health care benefits. Biden detailed the proposal during a speech before a joint session of Congress in which he rolled out his agenda for the coming months. The centerpiece of the speech is the families’ plan, which is being rolled out less than a month after Biden unveiled a $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal.

The American Families Plan calls for a $200 billion program offering universal pre-kindergarten for all three and four-year-olds; $109 billion for tuition-free community college for any American who wants it; $85 billion to increase Pell Grants to benefit low-income and minority students; and more than $4 billion in funding for larger scholarships, certification and support programs for teachers.

The plan builds upon provisions of the American Rescue Plan by extending the Affordable Care Act premiums tax credits indefinitely (sounds much like Government operated Healthcare to me) and makes the earned income tax credit expansion for childless workers permanent. If passed and signed into law, it would permanently make the child tax credit fully available to the lowest-income families while extending other aspects of the credit expansion, such as the increase in the credit amount, through 2025.

The proposal also calls for the creation of a national paid family and medical leave program. The $225 billion earmarked for this specific giveaway would provide workers up to $4,000 a month if they require leave to care for a new child, care for a seriously ill loved one, deal with an illness, or another serious reason.

Other measures Biden called on Congress to pass include $45 billion for meal programs for children and low-income families, unemployment insurance reform, $225 billion for child care that includes a $15 minimum wage for early childhood staff, and expanded child care center accessibility. Officials said the plan would be paid for through tax reforms targeted at wealthy Americans, such as an increased capital gains tax rate, a higher top income tax rate, and increased IRS auditing enforcement on high-income individuals and businesses.

“We view the American Families Plan as a core element of President Biden’s strategy to build back better and generate a strong and inclusive economy for the future,” a senior administration official said.

The plan, which faces an uncertain future in Congress, does not go as far as some Democrats hoped. Some have pressed for a permanent expansion of the child tax credit, and it’s not clear that lawmakers will be satisfied by the proposal to make part of the expansion permanent while extending other parts through 2025. Key Democrats signaled that the House bill would include such a provision despite Biden not putting it in his initial proposal.

Biden has also faced pressure from members of his party, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), to include health-related provisions expanding health coverage and lowering drug prices. The ideas had initially been expected to be part of the plan, but Biden did not include them in the final version. Asked why such provisions were not included, a senior administration official said that the permanent ObamaCare premium tax credit represents a “critical investment” and insisted that Biden remains “fully committed to negotiations to reduce the cost of prescription drugs.

The White House views the plan as a companion to Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure and climate plan he announced last month, and officials said that the investments would be made over a 10-year period. The two plans combined total more than $4 trillion in government spending, on top of the $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief bill that Biden signed into law about 50 days into his term. The administration’s two most recent proposals include tax increases that we are told would pay for both plans in full over a 15-year period.

Biden’s proposed jobs plan would allegedly be paid for through an increase in the corporate tax rate. Wednesday’s proposal would roll back the 2017 Trump tax cuts by increasing the top individual tax rate from 37 percent to 39.6 percent for taxpayers in the top 1 percent of income. Biden is also proposing an increase in the capital gains tax rate for households making more than $1 million to 39.6 percent.

Senior administration officials made clear the proposal is meant as a starting point and that Biden is open to hearing suggestions on what should be included and how to pay for the package. But Republicans are likely to oppose Biden’s family plan, and the tax hikes proposed to pay for it, and some moderate Democrats could also oppose the plan because of its large price tag and tax provisions.

One Administration official quipped that if people have other ideas about financing these critical investments, Biden is open to hearing them. “But he believes that these issues of tax fairness, of making sure people pay the taxes they already owe, are fundamental and necessary.”

Why do Democrats continually call new taxes “Investments?” By definition, investments are voluntary. Unless I missed something in Civics and American History, taxes levied by any government are anything BUT voluntary! If anything, they should all be labeled “confiscatory budget Income snatches from American.”

Biden and other top administration officials are set to embark on a publicity blitz after Wednesday’s speech to educate the public about both the infrastructure proposal and the families’ plan to win over support for both measures. The White House now faces a complicated road to getting both proposals passed. Even as officials have said publicly, they hope to see some progress on an infrastructure bill by Memorial Day and passage by summer. The White House has not ruled out using budget reconciliation to pass Biden’s proposals without GOP support, which Democrats resorted to passing his coronavirus relief bill.

Fear or Racism: Which is Worse?

Fear now daily grips the hearts of Americans. Why? Almost every day we see video footage of a police shooting that far too often involves a white policeman shooting a fleeing African-American man. Any shooting of ANY person by a member of law enforcement is sad and meets with great regrets. However, just as regrettable are the instances of such shootings quickly being weaponized by those who wish solely to stoke the cries of “Racism” that are ripping us apart as a nation.

“The shootings have to stop! They better stop, or else!” Cries like this from those in communities of color are far too frequent and way too loud. Subsequently, anti-police rhetoric is spreading across the country faster than has the coronavirus because disinformation about racist police shootings fuels its transmission.

The horrific murder of George Floyd ignited protests across the country, and despite the involved officers being charged, and one of them already tried and found guilty, most Americans agree racism and police brutality are wrong, public outrage soon expanded to condemn all police.

The shootings of Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade, and Rayshard Brooks have become symbols of racist police killings, regardless of the facts. The false narrative surrounding police shootings have caused law enforcement officers to be demonized, assaulted, and murdered.

The data is clear: There is no epidemic of racist police officers shooting and killing black Americans.

While every life is valuable, the number of blacks unjustifiably shot and killed by police is microscopic. Numerous scientific studies have proven that when behavioral, demographic, and other contextual factors are controlled, the racial disparity in police shootings disappears.

Despite these facts, politicians, activists, and the media continue to misrepresent the facts.

Reality: What’s that all about?

It’s rare for police to kill anyone. A black man is more likely to be killed by lightning than by a police officer. In 2019, police shot and killed 1,003 people in the U.S., according to the Washington Post’s Fatal Force database. Of those, 250 were black and 405 white. Police shot and killed 55 unarmed suspects, including 25 whites and 14 blacks.

Shooting an unarmed suspect can be justified if a suspect makes a furtive movement, attacks an officer, or tries to take the officer’s firearm. Of the 14 incidents of unarmed black men shot and killed by police in 2019, several involved high-speed car chases, fights with officers or had weapons recovered at the scene. Every shooting needs to be evaluated on its own merits, and only one of the involved officers has been charged with murder, but for this analysis, assume all involved excessive use of force.

According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR), there were 686,665 sworn police officers in the United States in 2018. That’s one unarmed black male shot and killed for every 49,047 sworn police officers.

In 2018, police made 10,310,960 arrests, according to the FBI, and the race was known for 5.6 million offenders. Of them, 1,548,690 (27.4%) were black. There were 229 black males shot and killed by police that year, according to the Washington Post, for a ratio of one out of every 6,762 black offenders. The ratio of unarmed black men shot and killed (23) in 2018 was one out of 67,334 black men arrested.

In 2015, about 53.5 million people had at least one contact with police, and 95% of those contacts involved traffic stops, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). According to a BJS special report, 91% of whites and 85% of blacks contacted by police during traffic stops said police behaved properly. Of citizens contacted during street stops, 81% said police acted properly.  Only 2% of all citizens contacted by police experienced force or the threat of force.

If The Numbers Don’t Show It, Why Do We Continue To Hear It?

It’s true the relative percentage of blacks killed is higher than with whites, but the press does not cover the shooting of whites to the same extent, probably because it contradicts the narrative of racist police. Shootings later determined to be justified are still trumpeted as proof of racism — as with the 2014 death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO.

It seems there is a weaponized narrative that is played for the American people but seldom played in the context in which tragic police shootings happen. And such shootings happen far too often regardless of the race of the shooter or the person shot. Unfortunately, those who weaponize skin color in police shootings seldom mention police shootings — though each and everyone is horrendous — in which no person of color is who gets shot.

In Burnsville, MN, police got a report that a man, 30-year-old Bradley Olsen, had been involved in a carjacking. They pursued the vehicle Olsen was driving, he fired at them, and they returned fire, hitting and killing him.

In Fort Worth on the same day, police also responded to reports of a man trying to steal cars. The armed man fled on foot, and an officer told him to drop his weapon. As the officer pursued, 31-year-old Ryan Williams pointed his gun at the cop and fired a shot. The officer returned fire and killed him.

The difference between these two incidents was that Bradley Olsen was white, and Ryan Williams was black. Otherwise, the cases are largely indistinguishable — how they started, how they played out, and, emphatically, how they ended.

This is the overall sense that one gets from the Washington Post’s famous database of police-involved shootings. Reading through it, there is no stark racial difference that jumps out, rather a dreary sameness. The fact patterns that get people shot by the cops, whether they are white, black, or Hispanic, are largely the same.

There are the most extreme cases when suspects engage in gun battles with cops. But pointing a gun, including a fake gun, at an officer also is likely to end badly. So is approaching a cop with a knife or even a metal pipe and refusing, despite repeated orders, to put it down. Resisting arrest is a common theme and, quite often, the people killed by the police were obviously mentally disturbed.

The Washington Post database suggests we have a violence problem in America and certainly a mental-health problem, but not — at least not on the face of it — a race problem.

Consider just these police-involved killings detailed below. Almost every type of incident involved people of different races.

Elections Really Do Have Consequences…Unless Republicans Win

It’s hard to believe that an actual massive audit of ALL ballots cast in Maricopa County in Arizona last November 3rd is underway. But it’s easy to believe that the Democrat Party, both in the state and nationally, is beside themselves with fear and hatred for the Arizona courts allowing this audit to happen.

Keeping that in mind, here’s a simple question for ALL Democrats and ALL Americans, for that matter: If there was NO cheating in Maricopa County last November 3rd, why are Democrats so worried about an audit’s results?

I think the answer is obvious: “where there’s smoke, there’s fire.” And the only anticipated fire that would make sense for those who watched the actual election process play out is one of exposure — exposure of vote fraud. That’s not declaring that there WAS Arizona voter fraud. It declares that Democrats are concerned about an audit that will expose any fraud that did occur.

And Democrats in Arizona and Washington want that to remain hidden? Why would proving that be such a big deal to Democrat Party leaders?

That’s a great question! Let’s see if we can answer it.

What’s on the Table For AZ’s Audit?

Barack Obama liked to remind us that “elections have consequences.”

Boy, do they! For conservatives like me, the months since Democrats took over the White House and the Senate have been a tsunami of consequences. How do you think I like it when Joe Biden’s handlers aim 60 executive orders at the tip of his pen to effectuate a fundamental transformation of this country? Or when the Democrat-controlled Congress tries to push through statehood for the District of Columbia to guarantee their continued control of the Senate? Or when the southern border is turned into a 2,000-mile illegal-immigrant processing center?

Unfortunately, the political talking point that “elections have consequences” is not recognized as a legitimate principle when Republicans defeat Democrats. That was obvious when Donald Trump won the 2016 election and spent the next four years being vilified as a Russian puppet, a racist, and a danger to the republic. You see, Democrats consider elections to be their most legitimate means of seizing power, but not necessarily the most effective. For them, politics is the continuation of war by other means, and they have been waging war against not just Republicans but against the Constitution for at least the last 50 years.

We could examine the truth of that statement in multiple arenas, including the attempt to repeal or neuter the Second Amendment, the assault on equal rights to replace equality with the Orwellian concept of equity, and of course, the aforementioned unconstitutional push to convert D.C. into a state.

But let’s stick with elections because any political party that controls elections ultimately controls everything else. Nancy Pelosi obviously knows that she made the “For the People Act” her No. 1 priority in the 117th Congress. The Constitution gives authority over federal elections to the individual states that make up the Union. Still, Pelosi’s H.R. 1 would strip that authority from the states and give it to Congress. One provision, in particular, would outlaw the use of voter ID to verify that anyone who casts a vote is legally entitled to do so. Again, as crazy as it sounds, this is the No. 1 Democratic priority.

Let’s say it one more time till it sinks in: Democrats want to ban states from using the most obvious and fair method to ensure that all votes in an election are legal votes — checking voter ID. No wonder millions of Republicans have a sneaking suspicion that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump. What do the Democrats have to hide?

But it’s not just the 2020 election that makes conservatives fear that they are being dealt a hand of three-card monte. Consider what is happening in the state of Montana. Gov. Greg Gianforte just signed two election integrity bills into law. Almost immediately, the state was hit with a lawsuit by the Democratic Party to overturn the people’s will.

Wait a minute? I thought elections have consequences! But you forgot the asterisk that indicates “unless Republicans win.” This is truly infuriating to conservatives. Montana has had a solidly Republican legislature for quite a few years. Still, Montana citizens also elected Democrat governors who liked to wield their veto pens to prevent conservative reforms from being instituted. When Rep. Gianforte left Congress to become governor, it promised a whole new world for Montana Republicans.

Montana is one state that has aggressively stepped out to support controversial Constitutional matters — in some cases as much or more than the other Red States. To ensure the right to self-defense, the state has removed many restrictions on the ability of people to carry guns. Montana was also one of the first states to pass liability protection for businesses reopened despite COVID fears. And in a fit of common sense, the Legislature has banned sanctuary cities in the state: Illegal aliens will no longer be a protected class in certain left-leaning municipalities.

All of those new laws surely will be challenged in court, as they are in other states, but Democrats seem particularly averse to election integrity. They lost no time in bringing suit against two election laws that Gov. Gianforte signed last week. Under House Bill 176, voter registration will no longer be permitted on Election Day but will instead end no later than noon on the day before an election. Senate Bill 169, meanwhile, established requirements for would-be voters to provide some ID both when registering to vote and when actually casting a vote. In a pre-woke world, this would have qualified as bipartisan common sense since its purpose is to prevent cheating. Still, nowadays, we are told that imposing common-sense restrictions on voting is racism and that cheating is just the price we have to pay for being an inclusive society.

Democrat super-lawyer Marc Elias, the guy whom Hillary Clinton hired to engineer the Russia hoax, wasted no time trying to ensure that Montana elections remain a haven for fraud and abuse. His lawsuit claims that the state’s new laws “represent the latest round of legislative shadowboxing aimed at imaginary threats to election integrity, and false accusations of election fraud orchestrated by those seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, now weaponized by the Legislature to impede access to the franchise.”

In short, he claims that the two laws will prevent people from voting. In particular, he says that the laws place an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote for students, Native Americans, the elderly, those with disabilities, and others.

Of course, that is nonsense. The burden placed on those groups is the same as the burden placed on all Montanans and citizens in numerous other states. If you want to vote, prove that you are a resident! That’s racist? It’s not some hideous “cruel and unusual” ordeal that targets any one group. Basically, the voter ID law says you need to produce photo identification or provide the last four digits of your Social Security number or show some document like a utility bill that includes your name and address. Wow! I’m not sure I would even want to participate in a democracy where voters aren’t bright enough to prove they are real people.

As for the new law ending same-day voter registration, that is a long-overdue change. Montana county election officials were increasingly overwhelmed with late voters showing up on Election Day in November 2020 to register at the last minute and sucking up resources that should have been directed toward protecting the integrity of the election itself. And don’t tell me that ending voter registration a day early represents any burden. It’s called a deadline. Get used to it.

Bottom line: Both Montana laws are intended to lessen the opportunity for cheating on Election Day. Why, therefore, is the Democratic Party so intent on eliminating these laws? Georgia’s new voter reform law that set every Democrat on fire does NOTHING except make voting easier, voting times, and numbers of days increased. Every county/voting precinct has a dropbox. That’s considered “voting suppression? Really?

For that matter, why don’t Democrats want a serious, impartial investigation of voting irregularities in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, and Nevada? If cheating took place, shouldn’t we try to find out about it? Apparently not, because Democrat Party attorneys filed lawsuit after lawsuit to prevent anyone from auditing or reviewing the election results from Nov. 3rd.

Taken together, the message of all these lawsuits is clear: Elections have consequences, but cheating doesn’t. And cheating is immaterial — UNLESS you get caught. If you’re the party that controls the “election cops” and what they can do and are allowed to do in investigations of alleged voter fraud, there will NEVER be proven voter fraud!

Democrats certainly know that. In fact, that’s the reason why they push so diligently against the light of truth being shined on election processes in these “marginal” states.

Facts WILL out; truth WILL prevail. America will always be a beacon of truth and fairness — especially regarding our election processes. Dems will have to accept that they will NOT bully Americans into benignly giving away our representative republic to a bunch of sycophants who are driven by their lust for totalitarian power!

To quote one famous redneck: “It ain’t happening!”

To Download Today’s (Tuesday, April 27, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:

“Follow the Science”

From masks to lockdowns, Hydroxychloroquine to Remdisivir, Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson, and Johnson, from social distancing to the super spreader illegal immigrants housed in hovels at our southern border, the science of COVID-19 daily becomes based less on “Science” and more on a type of political thuggery.

No objective medical professional can rightfully maintain that all of the “Science” regarding COVID-19 was discovered, tested, with results that conclusively prove that the “Science” verifies what citizens from around the World have received from medical experts. These experts in large are running the entire world with their oppressive medical mandates. We are instructed to simply ignore the facts about COVID-19 that have been reversed by these same “Experts” in some cases, in others, revealed to have been wrong from the start!

Don’t you dare disagree with any of these experts! Why?

First, if your disagreement is put in writing and/or published in social media, Big Tech social media platforms either block the content of such disagreements or include a disclaimer warning readers that “the specific content is discounted by medical professionals.”

Secondly, if you happen to make it on a national television or radio news show to share your findings on the matter, Cancel Culture police will immediately pounce on you, your integrity, and YOUR knowledge on the matter. The onslaught of outrage dooms many such investigators and reporters to bicycle package delivery positions after losing their jobs as reporters.

We all need to understand this one thing: Facts Matter. When placed in the context of the necessity of true medical science for the purpose of making life and death decisions, facts are the ONLY things that matter.

So why do the experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx NOT give us consistency in their “facts” about COVID-19, its treatment, its truths, and its sources?

Fraud Confirmed

A clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a southern California laboratory say he and colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud. The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people who tested “positive” actually showed the presence of COVID-19. ALL these people were simply found to have Influenza A and, to a lesser extent, Influenza B. This is consistent with the previous findings of other scientists.

Dr. Derek Knauss: “When my lab team and I subjected 1500 supposedly positive COVID-19 samples to Koch’s postulates and put them under an SEM (electron microscope), we found NO COVID in a single one of the 1500 samples. We found that all 1500 samples were primarily Influenza A and some Influenza B, but no cases of COVID-19. We did not use the bulls*** PCR test.”

At 7 universities not once was COVID-19 detected

When we sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a couple of the labs at the University of California, they came up with the same result: NO COVID-19. They too found Influenza A and B. Then we all asked the CDC for viable samples of COVID-19. The CDC said they can’t give them, because they don’t have those samples.”

So we came to the hard conclusion through all our research and lab work that COVID-19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was only called ‘COVID,’ and most of the 225,000 deaths were from co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, etc. They got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died.”

“This virus is fictitious”

I still need to find one viable sample with COVID-19 to work with. We, who conducted the lab test with these 1500 samples at the 7 universities, are now suing the CDC for COVID-19 fraud. The CDC still has not sent us a viable, isolated, and purified sample of COVID-19. If they can’t or won’t, then I say there is no COVID-19. It’s fictional.”

The four research papers describing the genome extracts of the COVID-19 virus never managed to isolate and purify the samples. All four papers describe only small pieces of RNA that are only 37 to 40 base pairs long. That is NOT a VIRUS. A viral genome normally has 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.”

Now that COVID-19 is supposedly so bad everywhere, how come not one lab in the world has completely isolated and purified this virus? That’s because they never really found the virus. All they ever discovered were small pieces of RNA that were not identified as the virus anyway. So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain, just like every year. COVID-19 does not exist and is fictitious.

I believe that China and the globalists have set up this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a new virus) to establish a global tyranny and totalitarian control police state. This intrigue included (also) massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.

CDC itself admits to having no identifiable virus

Deeply hidden in an official document on COVID-19, the CDC ruefully admitted as early as summer 2020 that it does not have a measurable virus: “As no quantified (= measured) isolated virus objects of 2019-nCoV are available at this time…” (page 39 of the ‘CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel’ (July 13) In other words, the CDC, as one of THE leading medical authorities in the world, could not, and still cannot, demonstrate a virus.

The efficacy and accuracy of this PCR test have been scientifically totally debunked, but still, shamelessly the CDC abused PCR tests. The CDC wrote under the heading ‘limitations’: ‘The detection of viral RNA cannot demonstrate the presence of an infectious virus, or that 2019-Novel CoV is the causative agent of clinical symptoms.” And in addition: “This test cannot exclude other diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

“In other words, we cannot prove that the people who get sick and are hospitalized, (and occasionally die) were sickened by a new coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, nor can we prove that it caused them to develop a new disease called ‘Covid-19.’ It could just as easily be a different virus and a different disease. (And since all the symptoms, including severe pneumonia, correspond seamlessly to what flu can cause historically in vulnerable people… ‘if it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck’.”

A reward of $265,000 for demonstrating coronavirus

Earlier this year, Samuel Eckert’s German Team and the Isolate Truth Fund pledged a reward of at least $265,000 for any scientist who can provide incontrovertible proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated and therefore exists. They too pointed out that not one lab in the world has yet been able to isolate this coronavirus.

Yes, systems scientists claim they have, but this “isolation” consists only of a sample from the human body, which is a “soup” full of different kinds of cells, remains of viruses, bacteria, et cetera. With the help of (toxic) chemicals, one then searches for some (residual) particles that may indicate a virus that once existed or may still exist, after which this is designated as ‘evidence.

A Canadian team also received no evidence despite 40 Public Access Law requests

In late December 2020, there was a similar initiative to the one in Germany. A team around Canadian investigative journalist Christine Massey submitted no less than 40 Public Access Law requests to medical authorities worldwide with the simple request for proof that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated and its existence can therefore be objectively proven. Not one of the agencies and authorities written to was able to provide that evidence.

Combined PCR test for corona and influenza ‘because there’s hardly any difference’

Not surprisingly, the world’s largest biotech company, China’s BGI, recently launched a new PCR test that can simultaneously test for influenza A, B, and corona. Apart from the proven fact, acknowledged through various lawsuits, that a PCR test cannot prove infection with any virus whatsoever, BGI’s explanation that both diseases are so difficult to distinguish from each other and that they have therefore made only one test, says more than enough. Maybe there IS no difference at all, “COVID” is just another name for “old familiar” flu viruses, and this is just another clever marketing trick.

Most people have been fooled by fear propaganda

With worldwide, government-controlled 24/7 fearful propaganda by the mass media, most people have come to believe that there is indeed a life-threatening virus that makes people sick much faster and more severely than the seasonal flu. However, even the latter is demonstrably not the case. Influenza A has been the leading cause of death from pneumonia in the developed world for years.

When physicians send people designated as severe COVID-19 patients to a few ICUs, put cameras on them constantly, instruct a few physicians that they should only discuss the worst cases, and you have your “televised pandemic.” The argument “we are doing it because otherwise, care will be overburdened was undermined by governments themselves some time ago, by rejecting offers of additional ICU beds or staff, because ‘it is not necessary.’ (Was this perhaps the first and only time the truth was told?)”

The official figures show that, after the normal traditional flu season, nothing is wrong, and according to the EU statistics (EuroMOMO) there is even significantly lower mortality, and the society – if it really was about a virus and public health – should immediately go back to normal to start repairing the huge damage caused by government policies.

Fatal Problems with COVID-19 vaccines

TruthNewsNetwork has followed the science as reported weekly in a report called “VAERS: Vaccine Adverse Reactions Statistics.” Since its establishment in 1990, this report tracks reactions people have immediately following vaccinations of all kinds, including the flu — including mortality occurrences. It began tracking adverse reactions by those receiving COVID-19 vaccinations the first week of January 2021. As of Friday, April 16th, these are the VAERS numbers documenting deaths from reactions to Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J vaccinations:

  • Moderna: 1540
  • Pfizer: 1344
  • J&J: 154
  • Unknown manufacturer: 17


Here’s an age breakdown:

  • Less than 18 years old: 2
  • 18-29: 26
  • 30-39: 38
  • 40-49: 82
  • 50-59: 195
  • 60-64: 189
  • 65+: 2000
  • The balance was of “age unknown)

How do these COVID-19 VAERS numbers compare to flu mortalities?

There have been a total of 1096 deaths attributed to flu vaccines. Comparatively, one would think COVID-19 deaths are higher in number because of a higher number of reported cases than from the flu. But wait: those 1096 deaths following flu vaccines cover from 1990 through 2020. That’s 20 years of adverse reactions resulting in death from flu vaccines compared to 3000+ deaths in only 3.5 months of COVID-19 vaccinations!

There’s one more oddity that sticks out in all this: these numbers are posted once weekly on the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website! That’s Dr. Fauci’s organization. That means all the CDC “experts” know full well there are serious inherent consequences with the use of each of the three of the COVID-19 vaccines.


It’s safe to say, there are FAR too many questions about the efficacy of each of the vaccines for Americans to simply fall in line for vaccinations. Let’s be frank: the federal government rushed to the marketplace with COVID-19 vaccinations without the normal testing process required for any vaccination. In fact, NO COVID-19 vaccine has even been approved by the FDA! Each of the three was given only “emergency use only” clearance.

So why haven’t the experts “followed the science” — their OWN science and their own demands of everyone else — in research, manufacturing, testing, and extensive human trials to prove their safety?

That’s the million-dollar question that demands a billion-dollar answer.

This story is full of facts that decry the quick use of these medicines. There are far too many unknowns to make ANY reputable physician comfortable in doing so. But the perfect storm created the perfect scenario for doing so: “Political Purposes.”

Politics and its purposes drove information about COVID-19 since early 2020. Facts have been (and still remain) scarce, political partisans rush to weaponization the fear of the virus (if there really IS a new virus), and its use to lockdown our political system, economy, social lives, and all private Americans to gain power over the lives of us all. What other plausible explanation is there?

Folks, it’s no longer a “theory.” The facts continue to mount that disprove so many elements of the pandemic, eliminating even a possibility of it being credibly sold to us by the political power elites. Real medical experts in the thousands continue to run from the vaccines, shy away from discussions about the virus, and are horrified to watch how our nation has morphed into a locked-down, shut down, and fearful nation.

Is there an end in sight? That’s a great question for which we average Americans have no answer we can trust. And our educated suspicions are derided by experts — even those who change their “facts” on COVID-19 and vaccinations almost daily. (Dr. Fauci on Sunday even flipped again on mask mandates!)

We will keep bringing you facts as we get them. We’ll bring you statistics, news, and scientific facts as we confirm those, and will debunk any lies or misrepresentations we see.

Can you believe we’re at the point today where we are legitimately asking this question for which there is NO firm answer: Is COVID-19 REAL?

To Download Today’s (Monday, April 26, 2021) “TNN Live” Show, click on this link:


Saturday Bullet Points: April 24, 2021

Another week, another batch of big stories. That means a need for facts about the importance of those stories. That’s what we do here.

Take a look at each bullet point: read the first few sentences that describe these important events. If you need no details (or if you’ve seen them already), click on the blue arrow to go to a full story with details.

Have a great weekend!

Bullet Points

  • The news is out: Caitlyn Jenner has taken the plunge into politics — California politics. The transgender former Olympic champion (as a man) wants to represent the California people as Governor, and as a Republican! For complete details, click on this link:
  • Illegal border crossings into the U.S. through Mexico continue, and they continue to escalate in number. Most recently, 700+ Venezuelan migrants found their way into one border town, all in the last week!  Del Rio, TX seems to be the chosen spot for these illegals. Needless to say, Del Rio government officials are not very happy. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Truth News Network has kept you apprised of the status of tremendous voting irregularities in the November 2020 election process in Arizona, especially Maricopa County. The state legislature took the massive number of reports of fraud seriously and have been at war with the Maricopa County Election Board for months now. At question is a proposed forensic audit of ALL the election ballots. The audit is happening! For complete details, click on this link:
  • Have you wondered why it seems that Black Lives Matter has been given blanket “media protection” in the latest spate of riots around the country? Mainstream media outlets all ignore the fact that BLM’s involvement has been obvious. Their latest target is in Central Park in New York City. For complete details, click on this link:
  • What’s the latest “ism” to be used by the Left to demonize conservatives in the U.S.? “Critical Race Theory,” or “CRT.” What is it? It’s a “doctrine” created by Leftists elites who claim to know all there is about racism, ethnic culture, and, more importantly, what’s right and what’s wrong regarding racial unrest across the nation. Do you want more information about it? It’s out there, but NOT in Mainstream Media. For complete details, click on this link:
  • So what is Critical Race Theory? Let’s just say that it is NOT new, is a new tool to be used by those who supposedly are “experts” regarding all things racial, and is rapidly taking over the education system in the nation. You need to understand CRT and its dangers. For complete details, click on this link:
  • Did you see Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) from Minneapolis on Monday night calling for violence in the streets IF the desired verdict in the Derek Chauvin trial was not the one the jury chose? Of course, Maxine “knew” what the “right” verdict was. No realistic person can disagree with the judge in the Chauvin case who said (during the trial) Waters’ actions “could” be grounds for a Chauvin appeal, no matter what the verdict would be! Maxine has weighed in with her explanation for her actions. For complete details, click on this link:
  • It wasn’t too surprising that LeBron James’ tweet regarding the killing of a black teenager by a white policeman in Columbus, Ohio, was not censored or even blocked by the “Twitter Cancel Culture” gods. After all, he’s an NBA star, African American, and a Democrat! Obviously, Twitter has been blasted for its blatant hypocrisy. Of course, they have not responded, even though the tweet was based on false information. For complete details, click on this link:
  • The Transgender movement is flooding the nation, and it’s taking over the conversation about fairness in sports competitions. It all boils down to one question: Is it fair for biological males to compete as females in athletic competitions? Obviously, biological males have an advantage. In a meeting this past week one Texas Democrat politician announced that there are several more sexes that need to be considered in this conversation. In fact, there are six sexes! For complete details, click on this link:
  • The facts of the January 6th riot on Capitol Hill have been inflated in dramatic fashion by Democrats and the media. The tragic death of Capitol Policeman Sicknick was grossly misrepresented by all, including the police department he worked for. Congressman Ron Johnson has demanded an explanation for the reports of Sicknick’s death by the police force. For complete details, click on this link:

Mandela’s Communist White Hatred Germinates In American Soil

by Kelleigh Nelson: Guest Contributor

Despite the fact that both Obama and Oprah fawned over Nelson Mandela, he was not a savior for South African blacks.  He deplored the white farmers who planted fields and raised cattle that fed all South Africans. By black hands, many white families and even their babies were macheted to death.  The seeds of Mandela’s “anti-apartheid” have been planted in America and are now being thrust to fruition on our soil.

Mandela said, “The cause of Communism is the greatest cause in the history of mankind!”  

Unreported in the American press, there is a brutal white genocide still occurring. This massacre is being instigated by the African National Congress (ANC), the South African Communist Party (SACP), and like-minded organizations. The stories of white farmers being murdered, women and babies being raped, and property being destroyed or stolen are legion. Not only is the South African regime doing nothing to prevent it, but they are also deliberately adding fuel to the fire. Thousands of whites have lost their lives in this ongoing purge, just as thousands of blacks lost theirs in the ANC’s brutal rise to power years previous.  Link

Critical Race Theory proponents won’t tell you how close America is to Mandela’s South African carnage of whites.  Whites and blacks who disagreed with him or his wife Winnie were necklaced.

Demonizing White Americans

The very founders of America, those who gave their lives and fortunes to gain independence and liberty for all Americans, have become the enemies of today’s society.  Our Judeo-Christian brothers and sisters who fought for freedom via secession from the very country that wished to enslave them with taxes and control are now under an accursed and diabolical attack.

White hatred is the new parasitic hostility imbuing black Americans who have been brainwashed and propagandized by Marxist infiltration of their churches.

At a prayer session in support of Black Lives Matter, the pastor of St. Xavier Catholic Church in New York City instructed white congregants that they must renounce their white privilege to help “transform the church culture.”

Nelson Mandela’s hatred extended to our Jewish brothers and sisters.  He stated, “Yasser Arafat was one of the outstanding freedom fighters of this generation, one who gave his entire life to the cause of the Palestinian people.”  Mandela didn’t mention the “Palestinian cause” is wiping Israel out.

The perfidious media proclaims white privilege as evil as if there was such a thing, the NYTs 1619 Project as truth, revisionist history of our founders as factual, and white on black crimes as far exceeding other criminal atrocities which is a total fabrication.  Compensation to black Americans for our past history has been massive and continues today.  No black or white Americans alive today have owned any black, Irish, or native American persons as slaves, but instead have been helped to attain advances for all into American society and government.

All of it is a lie…a lie propagated by those who hate the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and Christian’s Messiah Jesus…communists hate the Bible and any mention of the Creator.  Their goal is to usurp God and put man in God’s place.

Infiltration of Black Churches

In September of 2020, I wrote an article about Manning Johnson’s superb 1958 book, Color, Communism, and Common Sense.  The entire 79-page booklet is available at the link; hardcopy on the web.

Archibald Roosevelt, the fifth child of President Theodore Roosevelt, wrote the forward to Mr. Manning’s book.

Manning Johnson’s story begins very much like many other black Americans brought up in a religious home.  It was the preaching of a communist Bishop of the Episcopal Church that inducted him into the party.  Johnson was a man of ability and education and felt frustrated by his race and color and fell under the spell of communist propaganda.  

For ten long years, he remained in the party, but the Communists failed to recognize Manning’s Christian upbringing; he was intelligent and he had courage and his upbringing allowed him to see through the lies of the communist doctrine.  Johnson explains in his book how communists have used and are using certain American blacks to the detriment of all Americans, both black and white.  

The 78-page booklet exposes how black churches were subverted and the communist plot to use black Americans, concocted by Stalin in 1928, to create racial hatred.  He tells of the real “Uncle Toms,” communists who posed as “friends of the Negro,” and under the guise of a campaign for black rights, set race against race in a cold-blooded struggle for power.  They are the ones who plotted with a diabolical foreign power the moral decay, physical slavery, and spiritual death of their own race.

Early Marxists

Marxists immigrated to America in 1848 after socialism had failed to take root in Europe; they’ve made a permanent home in America.  During the American Civil War, Marx wrote about his support of the Union Army, the Republican Party, and Lincoln himself.  In fact, he named the president “the single-minded son of the working class.”  Marx wrote to President Lincoln and after Lincoln’s assassination, he wrote to President Johnson.

It is historical fact that before the Revolutionary War, the Southern colonies were petitioning the king of England to stop the importation of slaves into their colonies.  Many nations, as well as our New England colonies, were engaged in this nefarious commerce in slaves.  New England and English merchants were lobbying the English government to keep the slave trade open.

Thomas Jefferson attempted to place into the Declaration of Independence a complaint against the king’s government criticizing that government for not allowing the colonies to end the African slave trade.  It was deleted so as not to upset New England which was profiting from it. (Robert L. Dabney, A Defense of Virginia and the South)

Oh, that Jefferson had been present at the 1787 Constitutional Convention.

Critical Race Theory

Quotes from Roger Simon’s recent article Critical Race Theory: The Great Evil of Our Time are some of the best.

Something called Critical Race Theory intervened to turn our society around, head it back toward racial enmity and, to be blunt, destroy our country, and with it our common humanity unless it is stopped.

CRT is growing cancer infecting our schools, media, entertainment, and businesses. Every aspect of our culture has been infected with this absurdity right up to the corporate board rooms. Even Coca-Cola executives are now instructing us on the dangers of “whiteness.” Do they actually believe this hogwash? Who knows? Perhaps they are just scared, cowards playing along with the zeitgeist to keep their lucrative jobs. But if that’s so, it’s worse.

Most importantly, the ideology has infected our schools, even at the lowest levels, to the degree that young children are being hard-wired to hate or distrust each other and, even more sadly, themselves. (It now starts in kindergarten.)

White kids—no matter their social class, no matter at what point their families came to America, in many cases decades and more after slavery, fleeing genocides, pogroms, the most abject poverty or whatever—are being taught they are oppressors and must spend their lives expiating the sin of their skin color.

If you wanted to invent an ideology that actually created racism where it doesn’t exist, you could do no better than Critical Race Theory.

Dr. Carol Swain is a former professor of political science and law professor at Vanderbilt University and a lifetime member of the James Madison Society.  Her insightful January 2020 article on Critical Race Theory, is a must-read especially her own educational experience and the white teachers who encouraged her.

Systemic racism” is an evil lie!  Thomas Sowell says it reminds him of Nazi Germany and the propaganda tactics of Joseph Goebbels. It tells minority communities they have no power over their own lives when they actually have great power.  The Tuskegee Airmen certainly did, and they were asked by white bombers to be their guards. Why? Because they were trained in aerial combat and were magnificent in protecting larger bombers from German fighter planes.  Yes, they lost some; but their nickname was Red-Tail Angels.

My father’s grave is in the same cemetery as Tuskegee Airman Richard Highbaugh’s grave at Oak Woods Cemetery in Chicago, along with 1936 Gold Medal winner Olympian Champion Jesse Owens who put Hitler to shame.  God bless them all.  They loved this country, they knew freedom and despite the times, they became America’s heroes.

21st Century Communists

Black Lives Matter (BLM) was founded in 2013 and is run by three Marxist women mostly trained by Bill Ayer’s 1960s Weather Underground communists.  They have moved to infiltrate every segment of American society and to promote their communist propaganda, not only through churches but through government schools.  BLM and Antifa